John morrison 2010 mlb system

**SolidDala** · 05-13-10, 06:26 PM

well I don't chase 3 games for starters... I did chase this one for B and C bet for a 6 unit loss

I bet against TOR in the A-bet vs BOS so I don't follow the system strictly and therefor I'm not the one to ask..

I can say this though, if you don't like a series then just skip it, when backing a series, put wager in early you will risk 5-30% less of your wagers witch over a season is a great deal!

**goldengreek** · 05-13-10, 06:33 PM

John morrison just buried his clients with that chase system

sf loses all 3 games as big chalks

**thebestthereis** · 05-13-10, 07:01 PM

this is where the suckers get weeded out, now is where the system goes undefeated for the season; not to mention san fran wins 13 in a row

**stickbit** · 05-13-10, 07:48 PM

yup completely agree thebest... this is where those who managed their money will be fine and those that got buried are done for the season.

**rkelly110** · 05-13-10, 08:12 PM

Guys, if you want to chase, look at Cyril's posts above, #566 & #576.

What he said would've been perfect for this series or any other series.

**LarryF** · 05-13-10, 08:40 PM

What a mess! I have been losing on baseball for the last three weeks. What gives this year?
This damn chase is an early season disaster, SD wins 6 straight this year over SFO? What are the odds? LOL, yeah I know, pretty good, huh?
OK I will vote for JM's new filter tomorrow, created for this game, as a win for the season. No sense voting it for a loss like during the NBA season.
Sleep well

**daneault23** · 05-13-10, 08:43 PM

Originally posted by Cyril

SD Padres are +200 at BetUS for JM subscribers only.

We have the worst lines on JM plays at BetUS, but the best lines for the team they are playing against. This lines are not good for playing the system, but they are good for scalping.

It is a good scalping opportunity.

-Lets say you placed the bet on SF Giants on the opening line, lets say $585 at -140
-And now you bet $333 on SD Padres at +200 at BetUS. (maybe it will get even better)

In this case, whoever wins (SF Giants or SD Padres), you win guaranteed 82 $.

"JM nation" moving the lines + BetUS dealing dual lines = great scalping opportunities

Sorry for being slow here, but if I understand correctly, you put in the bet early at some book, and then wait for the last minute pretty much to bet at BetUS since fagboy JM has 4553423412 subscribers and raise the lines right? And that is how you get the scalping opportunity, aka free money??

**LarryF** · 05-13-10, 08:47 PM

Daneault, you are off by 2 the correct number of subscribers is 4553423414. Accuracy and integrity is important.

**LarryF** · 05-13-10, 08:55 PM

You neglected to count Francisco and Diego.

**JW Cash** · 05-13-10, 09:20 PM

Originally posted by goldengreek

John morrison just buried his clients with that chase system

sf loses all 3 games as big chalks

The truth is Morrison could care less what happened to all you SF bettors....

Well, yea...he does care...........coz he might need to open up a new bank account to hold all the kickback profits he got today from BetUS on all the
SF losing wagers from the worldwide Morrison's Nation .......

**dlunc3** · 05-13-10, 09:31 PM

ok boys.. tough loss... if we used proper money management, we should all still be alive and ready to get that money back... heres the question...what are the odds that jm loses 2 systems back to back? lets get the rest of this summer started on these cubbies big tomorrow

**Papaya941** · 05-13-10, 09:45 PM

interesting.. i dont fully understand this system yet so how about the original publisher start listing the plays for each corresponding day on here and see if this is the shit or we should just quit.

**thebestthereis** · 05-13-10, 09:46 PM

Originally posted by daneault23

Sorry for being slow here, but if I understand correctly, you put in the bet early at some book, and then wait for the last minute pretty much to bet at BetUS since fagboy JM has 4553423412 subscribers and raise the lines right? And that is how you get the scalping opportunity, aka free money??

there is no free money, you enter into zero risk. if there is the right spread on moneyline vs dog you scalp if dog wins. it does not happen often but the key is zero risk.

**CatPulp** · 05-13-10, 10:21 PM

Originally posted by CatPulp

A "C" bet so early in the season. I'm getting this sick feeling in my stomach!

Now I know why I had that sick feeling. There's no way SF should have been the favorite in all three games... no F-ing way.

**arconite** · 05-13-10, 11:43 PM

i can predict what JM would say- "in a rare occasion we would sometimes have to go for a D bet. historically D bet is 100% winning bla bla bet your house on the D bet. It's payday tomorrow, laugh your way to the bank bla bla, my mother will rise from the grave bla bla"

**Matweizman** · 05-13-10, 11:49 PM

Will someone please post the excuse as soon as he emails it please

?

**johncrud** · 05-13-10, 11:53 PM

cubs tmr

**cheaporanges** · 05-13-10, 11:59 PM

my condolences to all.baseball systems are taking a butchering.its early christams for vegas and your bookmaker.

**daneault23** · 05-13-10, 11:59 PM

Originally posted by LarryF

You neglected to count Francisco and Diego.

Yeah, my bad. I forgot about those two. Probably his two favorite subscribers too lol.

**therber2** · 05-14-10, 12:44 AM

Cubs [A]
SEA [A]
and
HOU [A]
(team swept)

**1capper2008** · 05-14-10, 01:37 AM

Houston RPI: .467
San Francisco RPI: .526

Seattle RPI: .457
Tampa Bay RPI: .538

I wouldn't touch Houston or Seattle. As far as the Cubs go, laying 2.1 to win 1 on game one is too risky for me. GL all who play!

**dukipl** · 05-14-10, 02:48 AM

Chicago Cubs [bet A] vs. Pittsburgh Pirates - this is the only official play 4 today.

**SpookyFellow** · 05-14-10, 02:52 AM

JM will come up with a new filter. Always take the alternate run line for favorites.

**Dzuro** · 05-14-10, 04:12 AM

JM:

2234...

What's the significance behind that number?

That's the total number of days that have passed since we've lost a single [C] bet in my MLB system! That's right - although San Fran may not have covered yesterday, that was the very first time in 6 long years that such an absolutely inconceivable phenomenon has ever occurred - and it came down to the very last play for it to happen!

What an utterly incredible winning streak this has been, and I literally cannot wait to start it again Skupni! It's been an amazing ride from the very beginning, and I have absolutely no doubt that it's going to be a smooth ride for the rest of the season.

I'm psyched with unparalleled anticipation to begin our streak again, and I'm sure you are too Skupni, so let's get to it!

**draze7** · 05-14-10, 04:16 AM

5/14 Chicago Cubs [A] -200

Pittsburgh

unoffical: seattle & houston

2234...

What's the significance behind that number?

That's the total number of days that have passed since we've lost a
single [C] bet in my MLB system! That's right - although San Fran
may not have covered yesterday, that was the very first time in 6
long years that such an absolutely inconceivable phenomenon has ever
occurred - and it came down to the very last play for it to happen!

What an utterly incredible winning streak this has been, and I
literally cannot wait to start it again ---! It's been
an amazing ride from the very beginning, and I have absolutely no
doubt that it's going to be a smooth ride for the rest of the season.

I'm psyched with unparalleled anticipation to begin our streak
again, and I'm sure you are too --, so let's get to it!

**sportsbetwin** · 05-14-10, 04:29 AM

It's not all bad - it will weed out alot of MLB JM bettors - will put less presssure on the odds.

**SolidDala** · 05-14-10, 04:31 AM

2234 days, Now thats funny:

He has only used the alias JM since season 2007 when he took the system from someone else, and has only used this system for ONE season, previous seasons where with no RPI-filter...

**Matweizman** · 05-14-10, 04:49 AM

Oh jonny-mo

**Kelloggs** · 05-14-10, 04:52 AM

Originally posted by Kelloggs

I made a schedule that I will update as the season progresses if anyone is interested http://www.sahlsa.dk/junk/jm_mlb_schedule_2010.xls

Added:
Stl-Hou 9/7

**robcorn** · 05-14-10, 05:20 AM

this is what he wrote

2234...

What's the significance behind that number?

That's the total number of days that have passed since we've lost a
single [C] bet in my MLB system! That's right - although San Fran
may not have covered yesterday, that was the very first time in 6
long years that such an absolutely inconceivable phenomenon has ever
occurred - and it came down to the very last play for it to happen!

What an utterly incredible winning streak this has been, and I
literally cannot wait to start it again xxxxx! It's been
an amazing ride from the very beginning, and I have absolutely no
doubt that it's going to be a smooth ride for the rest of the season.

I'm psyched with unparalleled anticipation to begin our streak
again, and I'm sure you are too xxxxx, so let's get to it!

**skrtelfan** · 05-14-10, 06:06 AM

I'm shocked he didn't say the play was on the alternate runline.

**Fishhead** · 05-14-10, 06:39 AM

"Came down to the last play"????

Dosen't EVERY baseball game???

Anyway, thanks for the free NO RISK scalping profits many of you here helped provide yesterday...........I love laying -141 and taking back +172.

I was pulling for SF bigtime for you all, sucks they lost.................but it was the first C lose in 6 years, it will probably be another 6 years before one bites the dust again, so fire away!

**Maxi_EV** · 05-14-10, 06:48 AM

2234...

**cmdyrds** · 05-14-10, 08:24 AM

guys it's gambling. we all know the risks. get back on the horse and start the grind beginning today. GL to all.

**julio_cat** · 05-14-10, 08:34 AM

2234 is a lie. The reason V 2.0 was released was to cover the losses he had in V1
This season: 3 wins for $300
One loss
75 % winning percentage