Phillies (Hamels) --- Giants (Zito) UNDER [-105]

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • pocketlint
    SBR Wise Guy
    • 12-17-08
    • 634

    #1
    Phillies (Hamels) --- Giants (Zito) UNDER [-105]
    I'm leaning on the UNDER here.

    Hamels (7-5, 4.42 ERA), has been inconsistent this year, but he's been settling down in recent weeks.The left-hander is 3-0 with a 3.00 ERA in his last five starts. He earned a win Tuesday night, giving up one run and four hits while striking out nine in eight innings of Philadelphia's 4-3 victory over Arizona.
    Hamels is 3-0 with a 4.03 ERA in four starts versus the Giants.



    Barry Zito (6-10, 4.54)
    Zito is 1-1 with a 1.89 ERA in his last three starts. The left-hander surrendered one run and nine hits in 5 2-3 innings before San Francisco broke a tie to beat Pittsburgh 3-2 on Tuesday night.
    Zito is 2-1 with a 3.50 ERA in three starts against the Phillies, who have been struggling at the plate. They've lost three of four - all on the road - scoring two runs or fewer in each of the defeats.


    Brian Wilson pitched the ninth Saturday for his 27th save in 31 chances.
    Wilson has not allowed a run in his last 9 1-3 innings, converting all five of his save opportunities during that stretch.


    Whaddaya guys think? Can go either way or UNDER for sure? The ML throws me off here - I think both teams have a decent chance of picking this game although odds are slightly better for the Giants with Freddy Sanchez in.
  • fifawcs
    SBR MVP
    • 05-14-07
    • 2888

    #2
    Phils should smash Zito. Hamels could have an off day. I would stay away.
    Comment
    • fifawcs
      SBR MVP
      • 05-14-07
      • 2888

      #3
      Lucky for you, Ibanez and Victorino are not in for the Phils. No Molina for the Giants
      Comment
      • pimike
        BARRELED IN @ SBR!
        • 03-23-08
        • 37139

        #4
        Originally posted by fifawcs
        Phils should smash Zito. Hamels could have an off day. I would stay away.
        Agree totally.. The phills score a lot of runs during the day time
        Comment
        • pocketlint
          SBR Wise Guy
          • 12-17-08
          • 634

          #5
          Originally posted by fifawcs
          Lucky for you, Ibanez and Victorino are not in for the Phils. No Molina for the Giants
          Where did you hear this?

          I have the following forecasts

          Phils

          Jimmy Rollins
          Shane Victorino
          Chase Utley
          Ryan Howard
          Raul Ibanez
          Jayson Werth
          Pedro Feliz
          Carlos Ruiz
          Cole Hamels

          Giants

          Randy Winn
          Freddy Sanchez
          Pablo Sandoval
          Bengie Molina
          Aaron Rowand
          Ryan Garko
          Juan Uribe
          Travis Ishikawa
          Barry Zito
          Comment
          • MrMonkey
            SBR MVP
            • 11-09-08
            • 2278

            #6
            dailybaseballdata.com, nice little site courtesy of poster waiverwire! Go to other tools and click on lineup. Ben F. and Brunlett are no Victorino and Ibanez!
            Comment
            • pimike
              BARRELED IN @ SBR!
              • 03-23-08
              • 37139

              #7
              Originally posted by MrMonkey
              dailybaseballdata.com, nice little site courtesy of poster waiverwire! Go to other tools and click on lineup. Ben F. and Brunlett are no Victorino and Ibanez!
              Wow not good
              Comment
              • pocketlint
                SBR Wise Guy
                • 12-17-08
                • 634

                #8
                Looks like no Uribe either!!
                Comment
                • t-bone
                  SBR MVP
                  • 03-18-08
                  • 3732

                  #9
                  Originally posted by pocketlint
                  Looks like no Uribe either!!

                  Uribe sucks.....I like the OVER +107
                  Comment
                  • Axis
                    SBR MVP
                    • 01-08-09
                    • 1255

                    #10
                    From your title...are you saying the under is @ -105?? Because last I checked I had it at -125...unless it started the day at -105...

                    If you're getting it at that price...where can I find it? lol
                    Comment
                    • pocketlint
                      SBR Wise Guy
                      • 12-17-08
                      • 634

                      #11
                      Well you are out of luck its at -110 now ....
                      Comment
                      • Panekkkk
                        SBR MVP
                        • 03-12-09
                        • 2430

                        #12
                        The under was the right call. However ... with 2 outs, Hamels gives up a single to Zito which leads to a 2-run double, and then another run scoring off an error. If Hamels gets Zito out, completely different story.
                        Comment
                        • pocketlint
                          SBR Wise Guy
                          • 12-17-08
                          • 634

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Panekkkk
                          The under was the right call. However ... with 2 outs, Hamels gives up a single to Zito which leads to a 2-run double, and then another run scoring off an error. If Hamels gets Zito out, completely different story.
                          Well with the bases loaded and more innings to go the under CUCKOO just flew out of the window.
                          Originally posted by Axis
                          From your title...are you saying the under is @ -105?? Because last I checked I had it at -125...unless it started the day at -105...
                          If you're getting it at that price...where can I find it? lol
                          And I think I saved this dude some woe.
                          Comment
                          • Nickelicious
                            SBR MVP
                            • 05-21-09
                            • 2647

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Panekkkk
                            The under was the right call. However ... with 2 outs, Hamels gives up a single to Zito which leads to a 2-run double, and then another run scoring off an error. If Hamels gets Zito out, completely different story.
                            I can understand people saying "this was the right call but it lost." A lot of public plays seem to fit that description. But a loss is a loss. A win is a win. Errors, bad pitches, dumb managers, fluke plays, shitty bullpen, whatever. A loss is a loss. We've all won and lost on wagers that seemed like the right call. But when you lose, guess what? It was the wrong call, because you lost.
                            Comment
                            SBR Contests
                            Collapse
                            Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                            Collapse
                            Working...