PADRES LOSE Harriston, key info for bettors.

yisman · 07-07-09, 12:35 AM

Do you mean Henry Blanco? Who the #%# is "Harriston"?

Do you mean Scott Hairston? They traded him.

pimike · 07-07-09, 12:37 AM

Originally posted by yisman

Do you mean Henry Blanco? Who the #%# is "Harriston"?

Do you mean Scott Hairston? They traded him.

Hairston

Razz_Donkey · 07-07-09, 07:04 AM

Originally posted by yisman

Do you mean Henry Blanco? Who the #%# is "Harriston"?

Do you mean Scott Hairston? They traded him.

I'm guessing this is in reference to Hairston. He was batting .300 with 10 hr's. Without him behind E. Gonzalez he will have 0 protection. Lose for the Padres and no benefit for the A's. Not sure what this trade was all about.

Rio DiNero · 07-07-09, 09:05 AM

I've watched the padres last three games, second half of the line-up is terrible, very easy outs.

yisman · 07-07-09, 09:25 AM

Originally posted by Razz_Donkey

I'm guessing this is in reference to Hairston. He was batting .300 with 10 hr's. Without him behind E. Gonzalez he will have 0 protection. Lose for the Padres and no benefit for the A's. Not sure what this trade was all about.

1)A.Gonzalez, you mean. His brother is Edgar and he only plays part-time.

2)Hairston wasn't batting behind Adrian, anyway.

3)It's a big benefit for the A's. They get a guy who's been hitting very well in the worst hitter's park in MLB, by far.

Razz_Donkey · 07-07-09, 12:04 PM

Whoops, I meant A. Gonzalez. I thought Hairston was batting fifth, right behind him? Regardless, I still don't see the benefit for the A's. Sure they pick up another hitter, but they are unlikely to be in the playoff hunt come September, so what's the point?

yisman · 07-07-09, 12:17 PM

Adrian bats 3rd.

Evidently the A's think they can make a second half run this season.

pimike · 07-07-09, 01:17 PM

I like the A's style. Padres are caving in.

pimike · 07-07-09, 11:58 PM

0-2 another loss for the depleted Padres.

They continue to battle, they may pull it out tomorrow.

sweetjones55 · 07-08-09, 09:07 AM

Pimike, you lost me a little on this one. You post today to never bet on the Padres yet first chance you get, you take them (saw them posted on your spreadsheet)?

Fowler · 07-08-09, 12:20 PM

Padres suckk, but today im not really confident on laying against them but reallyy PADRES SUCKKKK!

pimike · 07-08-09, 12:26 PM

Originally posted by sweetjones55

Pimike, you lost me a little on this one. You post today to never bet on the Padres yet first chance you get, you take them (saw them posted on your spreadsheet)?

I have lost my mind. I just don't think D-Backs should be favorite so high against anyone.

pattymayo · 07-08-09, 02:37 PM

Padres today boys.

pimike · 07-08-09, 09:03 PM

Padres do as I stated LOSE.

I almost lossed my mind. I am so glad I backed it with the run line on D-Backs.

Padres are now 0-3 since Thread.

pimike · 07-09-09, 06:29 PM

Padres look like they will be 0-4 tonight. I guess there could be a miracle.

pimike · 07-10-09, 12:01 AM

Originally posted by pimike

Padres look like they will be 0-4 tonight. I guess there could be a miracle.

No miracle

pimike · 07-10-09, 01:10 AM

Now if Padres are going to win one game against the Giants it may be tomorrow.

There is value in this one.

Banks vs. Sanchez

JOSH BANKS (1-0, 5.60 ERA)
Banks vs. Giants: 1-0 career, 0.95 ERA in three starts (first meeting this season.) Banks at AT&T Park: 1-0, 0.75 ERA in two starts.

The only reason Sanchez is even throwing is do to the injury of the big unit.

aznjeff07 · 07-10-09, 11:37 PM

so giants is the call tomorrow?

pimike · 07-11-09, 01:50 AM

Originally posted by aznjeff07

so giants is the call tomorrow?

How could you take the Padres EVER again. The worst guy the GIANTS have threw a NO HITTER

PADRES are 0 for since this Thread started.