As you may have noticed, the forum was offline for a period. We identified a security incident to Sportsbook Review Forum and took the site offline as a containment step while we investigated.
We wanted to make sure the system and site were restored and secured before bringing things back online and you will see that we are requiring all forum users to reset their password as a precautionary step.
If you have any questions, our moderators are around and happy to help where they can.
The new simulator i'm testing out scores it at 2.89 to 2.83.
Pointless info, and im kind of disappointed that the first time I run a test on it there is no play!
Comment
RiverMan
SBR Hustler
11-30-06
66
#7
7 is a low number
Comment
#8
Especially on a scale of 0 to ifninity.
Comment
xxdjstriderxx
SBR MVP
11-25-08
4740
#9
i can see an error costing the under here. if everything is played out normally, it should go under.
Comment
RiverMan
SBR Hustler
11-30-06
66
#10
Especially on a scale of 0 to ifninity.
thanks for your quality comment
Comment
Dexter
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
12-24-08
25829
#11
good thread - curious to see who actually gambles on sports for a living. only 3 i know of around here are ck, solobass, brandon laz......
Comment
#12
Originally posted by RiverMan
thanks for your quality comment
You're right, it was nowhere near the quality of "7 is a low number."
Comment
RiverMan
SBR Hustler
11-30-06
66
#13
You're right, it was nowhere near the quality of "7 is a low number."
if you don't understand the question, just stay out of the thread. wacko
Comment
BobHarvey
SBR MVP
07-08-08
3987
#14
Originally posted by muffin_pirate
if i was going to bet i would take the over
Likewise.
Comment
Squirrel
SBR MVP
06-11-09
1316
#15
Nothing stood out for me.
Comment
#16
Originally posted by RiverMan
if you don't understand the question, just stay out of the thread. wacko
I understand the question, I also understand that 7 is a low number, as does anyone with a brain. I was posting pointless drivel to reveal how pointless your post was. Carry on.