9/06/17
123-146-8, RoR –6.48% (vs 11/10 odds 49.0%)
Padres +103, FG, Flaherty / Lamet
Cardinals-Padres, Under 8, -111, FG, Flaherty / Lamet
BOL
Padres: Just about everyone knows (or should) Lamet is a tough nut to crack, but many may not realize the Cardinals are not a great righty hitting team and are only 48-47-12 versus righty starters in the head-to-head category this year. In a pitcher’s park the Padres are only a little short of the Cardinals for offensive potential.
Under: We know about Lamet, I don’t need to address that, but; Flaherty may not be so bad as his first start at San Francisco looked like. Yeah, the e.r.a. stunk but he did record a 6:1 K/BB ratio and a 2:1 ground ball out rate. There is every possibility he could settle down in his second start and lower the e.r.a., while not damaging the other two good ratios.
Might be back with another later, not sure yet. Let the lines move a little.
123-146-8, RoR –6.48% (vs 11/10 odds 49.0%)
Padres +103, FG, Flaherty / Lamet
Cardinals-Padres, Under 8, -111, FG, Flaherty / Lamet
BOL
Padres: Just about everyone knows (or should) Lamet is a tough nut to crack, but many may not realize the Cardinals are not a great righty hitting team and are only 48-47-12 versus righty starters in the head-to-head category this year. In a pitcher’s park the Padres are only a little short of the Cardinals for offensive potential.
Under: We know about Lamet, I don’t need to address that, but; Flaherty may not be so bad as his first start at San Francisco looked like. Yeah, the e.r.a. stunk but he did record a 6:1 K/BB ratio and a 2:1 ground ball out rate. There is every possibility he could settle down in his second start and lower the e.r.a., while not damaging the other two good ratios.
Might be back with another later, not sure yet. Let the lines move a little.