I hope the Rays hit for you man. I live down here and it's so hard to back them. I did take them with Moore against the Angels this week, but other than that I either fade them or no play.
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#3
Originally posted by Stammertime91
I hope the Rays hit for you man. I live down here and it's so hard to back them. I did take them with Moore against the Angels this week, but other than that I either fade them or no play.
Hard to resist anyone as an underdog vs. Sean O'Sullivan
Comment
44 Mag
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
10-14-13
34490
#4
Originally posted by LT Profits
Hard to resist anyone as an underdog vs. Sean O'Sullivan
LOL. I thought that same thing the other day & Lost. The dick pitched a decent game for once in his life.
Comment
Stammertime91
SBR High Roller
06-30-16
116
#5
Originally posted by LT Profits
Hard to resist anyone as an underdog vs. Sean O'Sullivan
Not disagreeing with you there but yesterday for example. Santiago is a garbage pitcher for the Angels, and comes out on the road and goes 7IP, 9K's and 0 runs allowed. This team is really good at taking garbage pitchers and making them look great.
Not disagreeing with you there but yesterday for example. Santiago is a garbage pitcher for the Angels, and comes out on the road and goes 7IP, 9K's and 0 runs allowed. This team is really good at taking garbage pitchers and making them look great.
Archer was a lot better last start too, 5.2 scoreless innings with 10 strikeouts. He is fourth in the Major Leagues in strikeout rate at 10.99 per nine innings and his xFIP of 3.59 is nearly a run lower than his ERA.
Comment
44 Mag
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
10-14-13
34490
#8
Originally posted by LT Profits
Archer was a lot better last start too, 5.2 scoreless innings with 10 strikeouts. He is fourth in the Major Leagues in strikeout rate at 10.99 per nine innings and his xFIP of 3.59 is nearly a run lower than his ERA.
AND, O'Sullivan is due for regression. LOL. Even after one game.
Comment
funnyb25
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
07-09-09
39663
#9
Do not question the play. Archer is pitching, it's a play...nothing else matters...it does NOT matter that Archer is probably the worst ROAD pitcher in baseball...GL today LT
Comment
jt315
SBR Posting Legend
11-12-11
21931
#10
Originally posted by Stammertime91
I hope the Rays hit for you man. I live down here and it's so hard to back them. I did take them with Moore against the Angels this week, but other than that I either fade them or no play.
I hear ya.
My over 82 wins ticket is just about in the trash.
Really thought this young staff and the added bats would get them at least 82.
Looked promising when they got to 2 under .
They do still get respect from the books FWIW.
Comment
Nateboogy
SBR High Roller
03-13-14
167
#11
What's does model say for Rockies?
Also, Houston total?
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#12
Originally posted by Nateboogy
What's does model say for Rockies?
Also, Houston total?
Colorado 59% (-144)
Houston 8.1
Comment
Yazworm91
SBR MVP
03-01-13
2397
#13
So Atlanta to off of variance to play? +280 vs model -223
Comment
Yazworm91
SBR MVP
03-01-13
2397
#14
What do you have for the Toronto over? Happ still pitching over his head. Love to get it at 9.5 but not going to happen
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#15
Originally posted by Yazworm91
So Atlanta to off of variance to play? +280 vs model -223
Yeah I am actually considering adding Atlanta. We shall see.
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#16
Originally posted by Yazworm91
What do you have for the Toronto over? Happ still pitching over his head. Love to get it at 9.5 but not going to happen
Model agrees with you but not enough for me with the 10 juiced for the Over. 10.6
Comment
MMA_Oracle
SBR High Roller
07-14-15
170
#17
hey LT, mind sharing what your model has for CHI-PIT, SEA-KC, and LAA-BAL please and thank you
Comment
funnyb25
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
07-09-09
39663
#18
Im surprised Pirates arent a play
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#19
Originally posted by MMA_Oracle
hey LT, mind sharing what your model has for CHI-PIT, SEA-KC, and LAA-BAL please and thank you
Cubs 58% (-138) *-But I hate the runaway line leading to extreme variance on Pirates. Sort of a makeshift lineup for Pitt too.
Seattle favored 54% (-117)
Baltimore 53% (-113)