From ESPN, the brawl was set off because Escobar had gone to 3rd on a defensive indifference.
What i don't get is why is it considered "wrong" to do that? The game isn't even over, and unlike other sports, baseball is one sport where theoretically you could come back from an infinite number of runs given that the sport is not time based. Why is it considered wrong for teams to be going going for every possible score even if the lead is considered huge (which it isnt even in this case)
thanks!
What i don't get is why is it considered "wrong" to do that? The game isn't even over, and unlike other sports, baseball is one sport where theoretically you could come back from an infinite number of runs given that the sport is not time based. Why is it considered wrong for teams to be going going for every possible score even if the lead is considered huge (which it isnt even in this case)
thanks!