Padres +2.5

leetreaper · 03-30-14, 07:42 PM

omg wtf..........

twestacott · 03-30-14, 07:45 PM

........ LAD lineup could easily put up 2.5+ in one inning once Cashner hits the pitch limit that they most likely have him on and this thing comes down to bullpens in the 6th.

leetreaper · 03-30-14, 07:49 PM

it's not even about that, -290

twestacott · 03-30-14, 07:59 PM

Originally posted by leetreaper

it's not even about that, -290

Thats what I was meaning...... that at -290 it isn't even that unlikely that SD gives up a 3 run lead once the bullpens come in to play. If you were gonna take that kind of chalk you would at least think you would want a situation that is a high percentage of hitting.

leetreaper · 03-30-14, 08:01 PM

Originally posted by twestacott

Thats what I was meaning...... that at -290 it isn't even that unlikely that SD gives up a 3 run lead once the bullpens come in to play. If you were gonna take that kind of chalk you would at least think you would want a situation that is a high percentage of hitting.

you still missing the point, playing -290 in ANY situation is retarded...

tsimmns · 03-30-14, 08:04 PM

Yes lots of chalk, call me crazy but I have risked lots of chalk in basketball all year long so might as well in baseball. I mean to win 5 bucks heck I'll lay it. And go from there. I'm waiting on the series odds on 5d. I know they had them last year just hope they do this year.

twestacott · 03-30-14, 08:04 PM

Originally posted by leetreaper

you still missing the point, playing -290 in ANY situation is retarded...

Nope didn't miss that point at all.... I rarely play anything above -150

twestacott · 03-30-14, 08:06 PM

Originally posted by tsimmns

Yes lots of chalk, call me crazy but I have risked lots of chalk in basketball all year long so might as well in baseball. I mean to win 5 bucks heck I'll lay it. And go from there. I'm waiting on the series odds on 5d. I know they had them last year just hope they do this year.

Assuming you win $5......... If you lose you gotta win 3 of these to get back in the black

allstarrt · 03-30-14, 08:22 PM

Originally posted by leetreaper

you still missing the point, playing -290 in ANY situation is retarded...

This statement,especially the capitalized part, is retarded.

leetreaper · 03-30-14, 08:25 PM

Originally posted by allstarrt

This statement,especially the capitalized part, is retarded.

mmmkay...

mlb · 03-30-14, 09:55 PM

-290 for that ... are you insane?

allstarrt · 03-31-14, 02:27 AM

Originally posted by leetreaper

mmmkay...

Hypothetically could be a bet one the board which in 90% likely to happen with odds at -300 (which implies 75% breakeven point) this would a would be a profitable wager right? There can be value in extremely high lines.

leetreaper · 03-31-14, 08:13 AM

Originally posted by allstarrt

Hypothetically could be a bet one the board which in 90% likely to happen with odds at -300 (which implies 75% breakeven point) this would a would be a profitable wager right? There can be value in extremely high lines.

Unfortunately you are incorrect but i guess you don't believe me...

GiveMeaBJ · 03-31-14, 08:16 AM

Originally posted by leetreaper

you still missing the point, playing -290 in ANY situation is retarded...

This is false on so many levels.

tsimmns · 03-31-14, 10:46 AM

The point was to just track plays and see wins and loses for tracking purposes. Some might lay 290 some might not. I prefer safer bets, yes I know there is no such thing, but it's just my mindset. Good or bad it hit and hopefully is the beginning of a winning season.

leetreaper · 03-31-14, 11:17 AM

Originally posted by tsimmns

The point was to just track plays and see wins and loses for tracking purposes. Some might lay 290 some might not. I prefer safer bets, yes I know there is no such thing, but it's just my mindset. Good or bad it hit and hopefully is the beginning of a winning season.

good luck

tsimmns · 03-31-14, 11:31 AM

Thanks leet. Same to you. Will be following your plays as well.

tsimmns · 03-31-14, 12:06 PM

On par with some of Leets plays here are mine for this morning

236301050-1	3/31/14 1:05pm	$7.25	$5.00	Pending	3/31/14 1:05pm MLB Baseball 901 Chicago Cubs +1½ -145* vs Pittsburgh Pirates (J Samardzija - R must Start F Liriano - L must Start)

236300821-1	3/31/14 1:04pm	$6.00	$5.00	Pending	3/31/14 1:10pm MLB Baseball 904 New York Mets +1½ -120* vs Washington Nationals (S Strasburg - R must Start D Gee - R must Star

leetreaper · 03-31-14, 12:18 PM

Originally posted by tsimmns

On par with some of Leets plays here are mine for this morning

236301050-1	3/31/14 1:05pm	$7.25	$5.00	Pending	3/31/14 1:05pm MLB Baseball 901 Chicago Cubs +1½ -145* vs Pittsburgh Pirates (J Samardzija - R must Start F Liriano - L must Start)

236300821-1	3/31/14 1:04pm	$6.00	$5.00	Pending	3/31/14 1:10pm MLB Baseball 904 New York Mets +1½ -120* vs Washington Nationals (S Strasburg - R must Start D Gee - R must Star

Let's do this

tsimmns · 03-31-14, 12:23 PM

Better than the -290 odds from the other night leet

leetreaper · 03-31-14, 12:36 PM

Originally posted by tsimmns

Better than the -290 odds from the other night leet

leetreaper · 03-31-14, 12:37 PM

Mets 3-0

leetreaper · 03-31-14, 12:48 PM

Gee gave it right back

tsimmns · 03-31-14, 02:19 PM

The Cubs game looks good for us right now. Do you do any series bets?

tsimmns · 03-31-14, 03:46 PM

So much for the mets.

leetreaper · 03-31-14, 03:50 PM

Originally posted by tsimmns

The Cubs game looks good for us right now. Do you do any series bets?

nah, don't do those