Originally posted by upscope
Mlb 2014
Collapse
X
-
inZaneSBR MVP
- 11-13-13
- 1206
#1821Thanks, it's getting late...Comment -
iloseagainRestricted User
- 06-29-10
- 10681
#1822i was wondering if i was reading his question wrong, or if the answer was that simpleOriginally posted by upscopeBecause you're getting a half a run broComment -
iloseagainRestricted User
- 06-29-10
- 10681
#1823twins wait til 6th to score haha oh well.. push aint badComment -
ChaominoSBR Rookie
- 05-14-14
- 36
#1824You nailed it with the early picks! Congrats and BOL for todayComment -
BiffTFinancialSBR Posting Legend
- 01-29-09
- 22670
#1825Wednesday 5.21.2014 final card
1* Rangers -1 RL (+101) - PUSH
1* Jays ML (+124) - WINNER
1* Brewers FF ML (+130) - WINNER
1* Diamondback/Cardinals under 7 (-105) - WINNER
1* Giants/Rockies over 10 (+100) - LOSER
1* Twins FF ML (+124) - PUSH
3-1-2 +2.54u
107-100-18 +8.93u MLB to date.Comment -
BiffTFinancialSBR Posting Legend
- 01-29-09
- 22670
#1826Yeah that was a bit of a bummer. Figured I'd eliminate Pads' biggest advantage (pen) by going FF but outsmarted myself. Oh well, as you said, no complaints about a push.Originally posted by iloseagaintwins wait til 6th to score haha oh well.. push aint badComment -
BiffTFinancialSBR Posting Legend
- 01-29-09
- 22670
#1827Thanks! BOL to you too.Originally posted by ChaominoYou nailed it with the early picks! Congrats and BOL for todayComment -
BiffTFinancialSBR Posting Legend
- 01-29-09
- 22670
#1828Thursday 5.22.2014
1* Phillies/Marlins under 7' (-115)
1* A's ML (-109)Comment -
BiffTFinancialSBR Posting Legend
- 01-29-09
- 22670
#1829adding
1* Nationals ML (+111)
Thursday 5.22.2014 updated card
1* Phillies/Marlins under 7' (-115)
1* A's ML (-109)
1* Nationals ML (+111)Comment -
BiffTFinancialSBR Posting Legend
- 01-29-09
- 22670
#1830Also likely will be on Cubs FF ML when it's released. Heading into three-hour meeting. Joy.Comment -
iloseagainRestricted User
- 06-29-10
- 10681
#1831Yea nothin u can do about that.. Good week so far after those last few weeksOriginally posted by BiffTFinancialYeah that was a bit of a bummer. Figured I'd eliminate Pads' biggest advantage (pen) by going FF but outsmarted myself. Oh well, as you said, no complaints about a push.
Comment -
BiffTFinancialSBR Posting Legend
- 01-29-09
- 22670
#1832adding
1* Cubs first five innings ML (+135)
Thursday 5.22.2014 updated card
1* Phillies/Marlins under 7' (-115)
1* A's ML (-109)
1* Nationals ML (+111)
1* Cubs FF ML (+135)Comment -
BiffTFinancialSBR Posting Legend
- 01-29-09
- 22670
#18332014:
Arrieta FF ML: 2-0-1
Stults FF ML: 1-5-3
Cubs vs LHP: 4.65 runs/9 innings
Padres vs RHP: 2.85 runs/9 inningsComment -
No coincidencesSBR Aristocracy
- 01-18-10
- 76300
#1834I don't understand this line, or the movement in favor of the Pads. At all.Originally posted by BiffTFinancial2014:
Arrieta FF ML: 2-0-1
Stults FF ML: 1-5-3
Cubs vs LHP: 4.65 runs/9 innings
Padres vs RHP: 2.85 runs/9 inningsComment -
BiffTFinancialSBR Posting Legend
- 01-29-09
- 22670
#1835I'm not going to worry my pretty little head about it and neither should you, NC. 60+% of public on Pads, most likely thinking Cubs suck and off extra innings and cross-country trip with depleted pen. They may well be right that Cubs pen will blow it. Just play FF and avoid those concerns, I say.Originally posted by No coincidencesI don't understand this line, or the movement in favor of the Pads. At all.Comment -
CappinTerpSBR Hall of Famer
- 11-26-09
- 9650
#1836I looked at this game and what I find odd is that the Pods TT Over is juiced a little too much @ 3.5 -125.? Implying that the TT over is the play............but the way I have been running.........take the under and u will win.!!.................................. .....glOriginally posted by No coincidencesI don't understand this line, or the movement in favor of the Pads. At all.Comment -
No coincidencesSBR Aristocracy
- 01-18-10
- 76300
#1837Sounds good to me. Leaned Cubs anyway -- just needed that added pushOriginally posted by BiffTFinancialI'm not going to worry my pretty little head about it and neither should you, NC. 60+% of public on Pads, most likely thinking Cubs suck and off extra innings and cross-country trip with depleted pen. They may well be right that Cubs pen will blow it. Just play FF and avoid those concerns, I say.
Comment -
BiffTFinancialSBR Posting Legend
- 01-29-09
- 22670
#1838Let's get it.Originally posted by No coincidencesSounds good to me. Leaned Cubs anyway -- just needed that added push
Comment -
nickcruz60SBR Sharp- 02-11-14
- 353
#1839Do u like dodgers tonight Biff?Comment -
BiffTFinancialSBR Posting Legend
- 01-29-09
- 22670
#1840Not in particular. Lean Mets/under, if I were to play it, probably would play Mets FF ML. Pass for me, but BOL whatever you decide.Originally posted by nickcruz60Do u like dodgers tonight Biff?Comment -
BiffTFinancialSBR Posting Legend
- 01-29-09
- 22670
#1841Absolutely itching to back Sale vs Yanks tonight. CWS -1 RL (-102) looks good when consider numbers for Yanks' likely lineup vs Sale:
Gardner/Jeter/Ellsbury/Tex/McCann/Soriano/Solarte/Roberts/Ichiro vs Sale: .210 BA/.302 OB%/.368 SLG%/.670 OPS/12 Ks/5 BB in 38 ABs
Based upon opinion of someone much better than me at this and who is big Sox fan, my understanding is that Sale's injury was never that serious and he was certainly dominant in rehab start. That said, Sale on restricted pitch count and best call is probably pass. penetrating self-control, I've been sitting here for a hour on the verge of confirming the wager, should probably realize that my hesitation likely is for a good reason.Comment -
BiffTFinancialSBR Posting Legend
- 01-29-09
- 22670
#1842Egads, Yanks lineup just released and it's a stone-cold riot:
Ellsbury
Jeter
Tex
Soriano
Solarte
Roberts
Murphy
Ryan
Almonte
Sale could handle most of them righty (Jeter and Roberts only two guys who have hit him at all).Comment -
inZaneSBR MVP
- 11-13-13
- 1206
#1843Well, as someone with little self-control as far as intelligent leans go, I'll play them for you! Phelps is not that strong, especially on the road. Sale's pitched well against these bums last year, and since the Yanks are 0-6 their last 6 here, I'll take it! BOL and thanks for your work here.Originally posted by BiffTFinancialAbsolutely itching to back Sale vs Yanks tonight. CWS -1 RL (-102) looks good when consider numbers for Yanks' likely lineup vs Sale:
Gardner/Jeter/Ellsbury/Tex/McCann/Soriano/Solarte/Roberts/Ichiro vs Sale: .210 BA/.302 OB%/.368 SLG%/.670 OPS/12 Ks/5 BB in 38 ABs
Based upon opinion of someone much better than me at this and who is big Sox fan, my understanding is that Sale's injury was never that serious and he was certainly dominant in rehab start. That said, Sale on restricted pitch count and best call is probably pass. penetrating self-control, I've been sitting here for a hour on the verge of confirming the wager, should probably realize that my hesitation likely is for a good reason.
Comment -
BiffTFinancialSBR Posting Legend
- 01-29-09
- 22670
#1844Also like Diamondbacks ML/TT over both a lot, but passing with Montero out and Aaron Hill batting cleanup. Aaron Hill is so bad that he should be a part of that shitty Yanks lineup that i posted.Comment -
BiffTFinancialSBR Posting Legend
- 01-29-09
- 22670
#1845I like this solution a lot. I can head out to tee-ball practice, consider my card complete, then come back and root for my Nats play and your White Sox -1 RL. BOL!Originally posted by inZaneWell, as someone with little self-control as far as intelligent leans go, I'll play them for you! Phelps is not that strong, especially on the road. Sale's pitched well against these bums last year, and since the Yanks are 0-6 their last 6 here, I'll take it! BOL and thanks for your work here.
Comment -
inZaneSBR MVP
- 11-13-13
- 1206
#1846As a former, back in the 70's South Side native, I'm also partial to the home town boys...Comment -
alamoSBR Hall of Famer
- 02-21-09
- 7131
#1847Sick beat with A's losing. So fcking sick.Comment -
iloseagainRestricted User
- 06-29-10
- 10681
#1848yep. woulda much rather them lose 1-0 than come back and tie it at 1 and then go up 2-1 and then blow it with 1 on 1st, 2 outs.... rays shoulda never scored in that inning, nevermind win itOriginally posted by alamoSick beat with A's losing. So fcking sick.Comment -
BiffTFinancialSBR Posting Legend
- 01-29-09
- 22670
#1849Thursday 5.22.2014 final card
1* Phillies/Marlins under 7' (-115) - WINNER
1* A's ML (-109) - LOSER
1* Nationals ML (+111) - LOSER
1* Cubs FF ML (+135) - WINNER
2-2 +0.26u
109-102-18 +9.19u MLB to date.Comment -
iloseagainRestricted User
- 06-29-10
- 10681
#1850dude i played cws -1 as well... still trying to figure out how we pushed on that oneOriginally posted by inZaneWell, as someone with little self-control as far as intelligent leans go, I'll play them for you! Phelps is not that strong, especially on the road. Sale's pitched well against these bums last year, and since the Yanks are 0-6 their last 6 here, I'll take it! BOL and thanks for your work here.

what a joke!!.. wish i played FF instead
Comment -
inZaneSBR MVP
- 11-13-13
- 1206
#1851I hear ya, Bro...But like they say, " If wishes were horses beggars would ride"Originally posted by iloseagaindude i played cws -1 as well... still trying to figure out how we pushed on that one
what a joke!!.. wish i played FF insteadComment -
iloseagainRestricted User
- 06-29-10
- 10681
#1852If sale wasnt on a pitch count then he prob woulda went 9.. Just frustrating that the yanks put up 1 hit thru 8 and manage 2 runs in the 9th on a weak single that the pitcher almost caught too hahaOriginally posted by inZaneI hear ya, Bro...But like they say, " If wishes were horses beggars would ride"Comment -
BiffTFinancialSBR Posting Legend
- 01-29-09
- 22670
#1853Friday 5.23.2014
1* Marlins ML (-108)
1* Marlins RL (+200)Comment -
BiffTFinancialSBR Posting Legend
- 01-29-09
- 22670
#1854adding
1* Rangers/Tigers over 8 (-115)
1* Tigers team total over 4' (-110)
Friday 5.23.2014 updated card
1* Marlins ML (-108)
1* Marlins RL (+200)
1* Rangers/Tigers over 8 (-115)
1* Tigers team total over 4' (-110)Comment -
BiffTFinancialSBR Posting Legend
- 01-29-09
- 22670
#1855I think that the Tigers are going to rip Scott Baker's
off tonight.
Comment
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code
