Phillies, yes the phillies cash my parlay!!

stevenash · 08-18-13, 03:44 PM

Had 'em too @-105
Hamels matched up better than Nolasco going in, that was one of the easiest plays this week in a week of difficult games to wager.

riffraff24 · 08-18-13, 03:45 PM

So how many times did you guys bet against the dodgers before finally winning?

Itsamazing777 · 08-18-13, 03:46 PM

Actually none, lol. Don't bet their games
just liked the phillies line today

stevenash · 08-18-13, 03:48 PM

Originally posted by riffraff24

So how many times did you guys bet against the dodgers before finally winning?

I don't fade streaks (very often, and when I do, it's not because they are due to lose), and I don't lay juice higher than -130.
Do the math

Jefferey13 · 08-18-13, 03:51 PM

Originally posted by stevenash

I don't fade streaks, and I don't lay juice higher than -130.
Do the math

dude first of all, you said you faded the dodger so you were fading the game so that is fading the streak.

Second, the hamels/nolasco matchup had nothing to do with the result, so don't call it an easy play.

third, the line of -130 has NOTHING to do with the juice.

Jeez, I wish there was an IQ test to post first. Like must have above an 85.

riffraff24 · 08-18-13, 03:54 PM

Originally posted by stevenash

I don't fade streaks (very often, and when I do, it's not because they are due to lose), and I don't lay juice higher than -130.
Do the math

Didnt you have a thread betting against the dodgers not too long ago?

stevenash · 08-18-13, 04:10 PM

Originally posted by riffraff24

Didnt you have a thread betting against the dodgers not too long ago?

Find it, very doubtful.
You find the thread I started about fading the Dodgers, I'll eat my words. No such thread exists you fukking broke dik fuk.

stevenash · 08-18-13, 04:16 PM

Originally posted by Jefferey13

dude first of all, you said you faded the dodger so you were fading the game so that is fading the streak.

Second, the hamels/nolasco matchup had nothing to do with the result, so don't call it an easy play.

third, the line of -130 has NOTHING to do with the juice.

Jeez, I wish there was an IQ test to post first. Like must have above an 85.

Hey asshole I don't lay more that -130.
Now I am going to do this in easy baby steps for you, because you are slower than Corky.

1)Hey asshole go back to post #5
When done with step 1, go to step 2

2)What part of (very often, and when I do, it's not because they are due to lose)
very often means I don't fade streaks very often.

stevenash · 08-18-13, 04:18 PM

Originally posted by riffraff24

Didnt you have a thread betting against the dodgers not too long ago?

How you making out finding that thread I started Corky?

Jefferey13 · 08-18-13, 04:29 PM

Dude, what I was trying to tell you is that you don't know the basic terms of betting. Odds and juice are NOT the same thing. Stop saying you don't lay juice higher than -130. That makes no sense.

stevenash · 08-18-13, 04:38 PM

Originally posted by Jefferey13

Dude, what I was trying to tell you is that you don't know the basic terms of betting. Odds and juice are NOT the same thing. Stop saying you don't lay juice higher than -130. That makes no sense.

Look, you are OK by me, so sorry if I was harsh, I get in arguments all the time re: this very same thing, about half the people I discuss the meanings of juice v. odds agree with you, and half say the same thing as I do, when used in the context that I did, the two words are interchangable

I really would love RiffRaff to produce that thread I started.