1. If he shot 45%, why didn't he take on a bigger scoring load? It was clear that when his team needed him most, he disappeared like he always does. Also, there was not a huge difference in rebounding as I showed you earlier. Plus, you cannot compare the rebounding of a guard and a forward, they have different roles. Not saying Kobe is a better rebounder but is closer than you think when you factor in their respective positions, size, height. Kidd used to average more rebounds than LeBron. But obviously, LeBron is the better rebounder.
LeBron is the better passer, I will give you that.
2. Kobe doesn't constantly get double teamed? Are you kidding me "brah"?
Watch this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nepmd2ygMK4
Yes, it is from 2008. However, these Celtics used the same defensive principles last year as they did in '08 (thank Tom Thibodeau).
If Lebron had a team that helped him win 60+ games for consecutive years, what happened in the playoffs? Don't tell me he didn't have a team because you don't win 60+ games without a team. If he was good enough to win 60+ games without a team (which is certainly untrue), then why could he not win 4 out of 7 games? Or make that 2 out of 4 because he was already up 2-1 on Boston.
3. Yes, that is one series...but it is clearly the most important from last year's playoffs. Does it matter that he averages godly numbers against bottom seeded teams? No, because he goes on to lose against the elites anyway...