[Ratzz]

Again. I'm not this dude.smh....got nothing against you ratzz

if i am wrong, i apologize.. the timing and wording, so similar..
one draws conclusions in a 'hot' moment. i will chill it out.

cheers' DM

[R.P. McMurphy]

Bumped for Nittany

[NittanyLionsFan]

I never saw this thread until just now. But lol at 3 days.

Just FYI...I have a degree in actuarial science with a 3.912 GPA so I'm pretty sure I know what I'm talking about when I say that your challenge would mean nothing at all.

Seriously...nothing.

If you want to do a season long challenge next year, cool. I'll do that. If you're going to offer a challenge at least make the challenge make sense. Making 4+ plays per day mandatory is also stupid.

Also I skimmed through your post and missed parts because I'm in a hurry to get on the road right now so I'll read it more in detail later.

[pulledclear]

[NittanyLionsFan]

Whatever dark side is, is not me. I've never had another SN on this forum.

[NittanyLionsFan]

Oh and lol at calling me a coward. Do you know what coward means? You don't even know me, dumbass.

[NittanyLionsFan]

There's plenty of cappers here who I respect and don't have any issues with too (stevenash, pacocn, no coin, LTProfits, etc). Thing is you display straight up sports betting fish tendencies like 100% of the time and it's hilarious. Then when I give constructive criticism and/or offer help you get angry and start yelling or "close thread please" like a baby (LMAOOO). Seriously U lost one bet and said "close my thread". What are u, 13 yrs old? Go get laid u fkn loser, I'm sure that hadn't happened in years.

[Avenger]

Here's a thread with Nittany going off on me

http://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/nfl-bettin...-ml-360-a.html

He calls me a dumbass, but everything I said in that thread came true. And throughout the season, everything else I said about the Colts came true.

[Avenger]

Nittany, no one gives a sh*t if you express your opinions,( even if they're wrong ), it's your condescending, know-it-all attitude.

Get over yourself. Ratzz is one of the best MLB cappers here, and he probably won't come back because every time he makes a pick and loses, you'll be all over him.

[pulledclear]

[Ratzz]

There's plenty of cappers here who I respect and don't have any issues with too (stevenash, pacocn, no coin, LTProfits, etc). Thing is you display straight up sports betting fish tendencies like 100% of the time and it's hilarious. Then when I give constructive criticism and/or offer help you get angry and start yelling or "close thread please" like a baby (LMAOOO). Seriously U lost one bet and said "close my thread". What are u, 13 yrs old? Go get laid u fkn loser, I'm sure that hadn't happened in years.

then accept the challenge, do whatever amount of games you like a day. A single game minimum. Do it for a week. I am not going to commit to an entire season of communication and exposure to/with you. Why would anyone bring that amount of aggravation into their lives?

The afore mentioned thread was closed to eliminate 'your presence'. Everywhere you go there is a problem. All of your exchanges end in bickering. If it were 1 or 2 individuals you had small issues with. Fine. However, you attack someone in all of your comments…someone must get it from you. That's the problem. *

Here's a thread with Nittany going off on me

http://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/nfl-bettin...-ml-360-a.html

He calls me a dumbass, but everything I said in that thread came true. And throughout the season, everything else I said about the Colts came true.

Nitt is a dolt, with serious acceptance/approval issues. You just were exchanging ideas normally like anyone else.. Nice call on the Colts, Avenger.. well said!,

Cheers

[ridims]

Just FYI...I have a degree in actuarial science with a 3.912 GPA so I'm pretty sure I know what I'm talking about when I say that your challenge would mean nothing at all.

[ridims]

this guy should really spend time hittin those books rather then post on a sports gambling forum. this whole thread is a good laugh.

[Ratzz]

i am going to translate this for everyone. Nittany's orig post is directly above, (same page)*

I never saw this thread until just now. But lol at 3 days.

TRANS: I saw this thread immediately, and have been fuming for 3 days. Wondering what to do about it. I am able to immediately spot a thread where any adversary has posted.. yet i missed the one with my name emblazoned in the title.*

Just FYI...I have a degree in actuarial science with a 3.912 GPA so I'm pretty sure I know what I'm talking about when I say that your challenge would mean nothing at all.

TRANS:*I am NOT going to accept the challenge. …but i need to establish that i am not an idiot, …though all of my social interactions with others would indicate that i am. I will post my GPA, (which no one can verify, or would care to).*

*Seriously...nothing.

TRANS: It would represent a great deal in fact, so i must emphasize the opposite.*

If you want to do a season long challenge next year, cool. I'll do that. If you're going to offer a challenge at least make the challenge make sense. Making 4+ plays per day mandatory is also stupid.

TRANS: I am going to issue an even larger challenge, one so large that Ratzz will be unable to accept, thus i will emerge the winner of 'gauntlets thrown' …as mine was much larger.*

Also I skimmed through your post and missed parts because I'm in a hurry to get on the road right now so I'll read it more in detail later.

TRANS: While I am not too busy to attack someone for a simple exchange of ideas.. but i am too occupied to fully peruse the details of highly critical invective directed at me specifically.
*

Nitt. don't post your GPA, just accept the challenge. 1 Week. We create a thread, and we see which one of us is in fact sharp.
Maybe neither of us will be. Let's find out.

You are not too busy to call somebody or degrade them for making an error. How can you be too busy to correct the situation by showing the rest of us how to cap!?.. should be a simple matter, given your pedigree and GPA

Accept the challenge and let's start today. I am ready.

[shooms79]

i am going to translate this for everyone. Nittany's orig post is directly above, (same page)*



Nitt. don't post your GPA, just accept the challenge. 1 Week. We create a thread, and we see which one of us is in fact sharp.
Maybe neither of us will be. Let's find out.

You are not too busy to call somebody or degrade them for making an error. How can you be too busy to correct the situation by showing the rest of us how to cap!?.. should be a simple matter, given your pedigree and GPA

Accept the challenge and let's start today. I am ready.

LOL love it! You want a good read Ratzz check out his other thread http://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/baseball-b...l#post15819324 HE issued a challenge and ending with "Can't wait to hear your excuse. Lets see who the real little bitch is." 4 min later HE backed out so fast with some bs excuse. You cant make this $h!t up! Thats an instant classic thread to me! Its ont thing to go home with your tail bw your legs for being beaten, its quite another to bury yourself, and in less than 5 min!

[Ratzz]

LOL love it! You want a good read Ratzz check out his other thread http://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/baseball-b...l#post15819324 HE issued a challenge and ending with "Can't wait to hear your excuse. Lets see who the real little bitch is." 4 min later HE backed out so fast with some bs excuse. You cant make this $h!t up! Thats an instant classic thread to me! Its ont thing to go home with your tail bw your legs for being beaten, its quite another to bury yourself, and in less than 5 min!

Shooms, that is a RIOT, thank you so much for posting that, (i was unaware of it).. he's so challenge-happy in that thread... why no fisticuffs for 'moi'? omg.. i think he got into trouble before and has restrictions implemented as safeguards ("can't watch football")

[Ratzz]

you know, Shooms.. i am thinking now that there is greater pathos here than meets the eye, he is not be "just an huge assh•le" as i initially suspected. I am beginning to believe that he has serious behavior problems. If that is the case, I will have to leave him alone.. people with very serious behavior issues sometimes lose sight/control of reality/their actions, and get into serious trouble..

[shooms79]

Ratzz, finally you have come to your senses. You cant argue with crazy. There are all sorts of people on this site, good and bad. Over time I have learned its really not worth acknowledging people that piss you off. NOTHING GOOD CAN COME OF IT. Also dont get mad at people on the other side and talking smack and gloating when they win. That's what drives this industry, someone on the other side. In the end, you are responsible for one thing only, and that your bankroll.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B48D60wH8gA

[shooms79]

Another thing that comes to mind, is just refine your skill and craft so much, no one can touch you. Love this clip too:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXRuo...eature=related

[Ratzz]

Another thing that comes to mind, is just refine your skill and craft so much, no one can touch you. Love this clip too:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXRuo...eature=related

lol.. awesome clips Shooms.. thank you!

and excellent advice. you are right on course.*
you are most sagacious, sir


Cheers to you

[NittanyLionsFan]

No idiot, I didn't see the thread right away. And "lol at 3 days" means you can't prove a ******* thing in 3 days. You can't prove a thing in an entire season, technically. A week or 3 days is going to prove who is better at handicapping? How stupid are you? Do you realize how incredibly small of a sample size that is? The fact that you don't just further proves my point that you don't know what you're doing with this stuff at all. I'm sure plenty of people here will side with me on this that 3 days or 1 week proves literally nothing at all.

[altieriflyers]

Just shut up and accept the challenge son.

[NittanyLionsFan]

Lol @ saying I have behavior problems when you don't even know me. Unless you consider getting angry as **** at people who watch television and going on a twitter rant like I just did a behavior problem (even though I don't usually do that), then I'm pretty sure I'm as well behaved as they come. But I will take your challenge if you come up with something that actually proves something. 1 week of picking MLB games isn't going to prove anything. And saying you have to pick 4 games a day makes no sense, what kind of rule is that forcing someone to make plays? I'm sure plenty of people here will agree with me that your format in the proposed challenge is not very good.

[NittanyLionsFan]

I'm not hiding or trolling if that's what some of you idiots think.


Now if you want to be serious for a second and quit responding with dumb shit like "Accept the challenge pussy!" why don't you re-read the thread and see that I've posted NUMEROUS times that 3 days proves nothing. Pretty sure 'ShogunRua' said the same exact thing right away to start the thread. That's another guy I actually respect on this forum.

aseball picks proves absolutely nothing:

Simple example...pick a retard troll on the forum who makes plays every day (bleek88, etc). Find a 3 day period on a calendar where he did well in a sport. Then go to all the proven good handicappers threads for those days (nash, nc, LT, whoever) and I guarantee you in most cases all of them will not have had a winning 3 day period. If you stretch that period out to a year...bleek will almost certainly be losing and the winners will almost all be winning, almost all of the time. Now there's a medium somewhere in between 3 days and a year that we can agree on...unless you're really going to be that stubborn.

Sorry if I sound like an idiot to you but if I really do then I guess you just don't understand common sense. Doing some stupid ass challenge with you isn't even really worth my time. I'm actually a really busy person. But I'm willing to do it if you make the terms make sense. Your goal is to prove, or at least do the best we can in proving, who is better at making selections in whatever sport. Now that we can hopefully agree on 3 days being too short of a time period... I will ask you to please make a more appropriate challenge. If you can't do so, later on (in a couple hours from now) when I have more time to post I will make a proposition of my own. Now please respond to this post seriously, I'm going to ignore any moronic posts.

And to those who were asking why I didn't want to watch football this season...it's really none of your business. It's a personal decision I made on my own not influenced by anybody and a friend who didn't believe I was serious wanted to propbet me on it. Regardless of that situation, I will do any challenge involving football plays. Watching actual games is mostly irrelevant when it comes to capping so I am up for whatever football challenge w/ whoever if that is the sport they chose.

[shooms79]

I'm not hiding or trolling if that's what some of you idiots think.

My name is Brandon Mifsud. My cell # is 212-203-5509. My address is 115 E 9th St, New York NY 10003. Not posting apt # because some psycho will probably show up. My twitter is @bmifsud. Not giving out my facebook because it's more personal. But there you go, I'm not hiding. I'm right here! Feel free to call if you'd like.

Now if you want to be serious for a second and quit responding with dumb shit like "Accept the challenge pussy!" why don't you re-read the thread and see that I've posted NUMEROUS times that 3 days proves nothing. Pretty sure 'ShogunRua' said the same exact thing right away to start the thread. That's another guy I actually respect on this forum.

http://www.casact.org/admissions/pas...xam1_f2007.pdf Go to #642. That's passing candidates for the P exam given by the society of actuaries. P stands for PROBABILITY.

Now that we know I understand probability, let me explain how that 3 days of baseball picks proves absolutely nothing:

Simple example...pick a retard troll on the forum who makes plays every day (bleek88, etc). Find a 3 day period on a calendar where he did well in a sport. Then go to all the proven good handicappers threads for those days (nash, nc, LT, whoever) and I guarantee you in most cases all of them will not have had a winning 3 day period. If you stretch that period out to a year...bleek will almost certainly be losing and the winners will almost all be winning, almost all of the time. Now there's a medium somewhere in between 3 days and a year that we can agree on...unless you're really going to be that stubborn.

Sorry if I sound like an idiot to you but if I really do then I guess you just don't understand common sense. Doing some stupid ass challenge with you isn't even really worth my time. I'm actually a really busy person. But I'm willing to do it if you make the terms make sense. Your goal is to prove, or at least do the best we can in proving, who is better at making selections in whatever sport. Now that we can hopefully agree on 3 days being too short of a time period... I will ask you to please make a more appropriate challenge. If you can't do so, later on (in a couple hours from now) when I have more time to post I will make a proposition of my own. Now please respond to this post seriously, I'm going to ignore any moronic posts.

And to those who were asking why I didn't want to watch football this season...it's really none of your business. It's a personal decision I made on my own not influenced by anybody and a friend who didn't believe I was serious wanted to propbet me on it. Regardless of that situation, I will do any challenge involving football plays. Watching actual games is mostly irrelevant when it comes to capping so I am up for whatever football challenge w/ whoever if that is the sport they chose.

Wow. Dude you seriously got issues. Im just saying. Yes, to your point, it is a small sample size. But like any journey, everything starts with one step.
As far as posting personal info and test info, blah blah blah. What does that prove? So you past a test to become an actuary, thats well and good. However how that translate to life, sorry sir but you fail. I have passed MANY tests for my career. In fact, I have to take achievements tests my whole life to prove my competence. You dont see me posting or bragging.

But alas, I have no dog in this fight. It is between you guys. However I just found that truly vain and a bit emotional. I think your two steps from cutting off your ear.

[NittanyLionsFan]

I didn't pass a test to come an actuary, dumbass. I passed every preliminary exam (5) and then stopped taking them because I don't want to be and never wanted to be an actuary and my career path is entirely different. I took the exams because I enjoyed them and the coursework material intrigued me.

As for the post...I posted the P exam, and the P exam only, to show that I am not a retard when it comes to expectation/probability/sample sizes/etc since this dumbass needed me to paint him an entire picture of how and why I am not accepting some 3 day challenge that makes no sense.

[NittanyLionsFan]

The OP here is too hilarious

[ActuaryDan]

I never saw this thread until just now. But lol at 3 days.

Just FYI...I have a degree in actuarial science with a 3.912 GPA so I'm pretty sure I know what I'm talking about when I say that your challenge would mean nothing at all.

Seriously...nothing.

If you want to do a season long challenge next year, cool. I'll do that. If you're going to offer a challenge at least make the challenge make sense. Making 4+ plays per day mandatory is also stupid.

Also I skimmed through your post and missed parts because I'm in a hurry to get on the road right now so I'll read it more in detail later.

Do you work in the industry or just tell people you have an Actuarial Science degree?