
Originally Posted by
thellama
Opie with a troll job and it's funny... but to simplify the reasons that a billion dollar company is losing the subscription war because of a 'libtard agenda' is pretty moronic. It's a business, first and foremost, I seriously doubt they sat down and thought Hillary supporters were going to subscribe en masse because they have a feature on Michael Sam? This isn't Ellen dumbass. Sure, we don't want to see it either, but we don't care about any of that shit. I don't want to hear interviews, see biopics, listen to two morons debate about stupid shit I don't care about. I'll go watch a 30 for 30 on Netflix if I'm in the mood. It's 2016, I can go call Michael Sam all sorts of bad words on Twitter and he'll probably read it before blocking me. I can go on instagram and watch NFL players ripping on refs. We are so connected to everybody now, a sit down interview with anybody other than maybe Hitler or Jesus Christ isn't going to interest many people. Everything is now so much more interesting than what they're giving you.
And the one thing that floats an entertainment company is the stars. ESPN always thought we don't need to pay Dan Patrick, Olbermann (if there was a libtard agenda, this guy would be running the whole f'ing company), Colin Cowherd, Erin Andrews, Eisen, Beadle, Whitlock, Rome etc, because the sports sell themselves. Dumb way of looking at it, the sports are the stars, agreed, but now there are so many different ways to consume the sports, ESPN is no longer unique. The things they got rid of, because they were cheap, the things that made them unique and fun to watch, the PERSONALITIES, are what would have set them apart if they actually still had any. All of their names have been poached by other networks, ESPN would create stars and than let them go. The one star they made that everyone wish would go away was Berman, which goes to show you how out of touch they are.
Those Guys Have All the Fun, ESPN book, good read.