Originally Posted by
BigdaddyQH
No, because rarely do problems from one school follow a coach to another. Rich Rod was the latest example. What he did at West Veiginia was porbably worse than what he did at Michigan, but nothing ever came of that.
The fact of the matter is that this is very political. It could hurt USC's chances of getting their current penalties reduced, but no ther penalty would be tacked on. If this were Wake, Vandy, Washington State, Indiana, or some other school that does not bring in huge money to the NCAA, the NCAA would just laugh at these guys trying to get their penalties reduced, but it is USC. Even though Oregon and Stanford have made great inroads in the Pac 12, USC is still the big money maker out West for the NCAA, and no other school comes close. Oregon has now played in a Rose Bowl game and a N.C. game and lost both. USC did not lose Rose Bowls, and lost one N.C. game, which many think was the greatest N.C. game ever. The fact is that the NCAA is walking the tightrope. They want to show everyone that they mean business, but they do NOT want to lose the money making machine that is USC. It is not like the SEC, where you have several very good teams that draw huge television audiences. Let's face it. Alabama, LSU, Florida, Georgia, and the rest of the SEC draws much more national attention than USC, Oregon, Stanford, and the rest of the Pac 12. If Alabama wnet on probation, LSU, Auburn, Florida, Georgia, or other teams would probably pick up the slack. With USC, there is no one to pick up the slack, as far a T.V. ratings and money goes.