[blowjoe2020]

LOL Don't trust anybody Eddy Dummy, Now you have "changed your tune" AGAIN and posted about what some lines fluctuated around all during the week!! I thought we had already said that Houston +6.5 was the only line that OPENED at that?
You can't just keep "changing" your argument to whatever you think makes you more right! LOL That makes you a hypocrite!
LOL I don't give a damn about anything but the OPENING LINE you goof-ball! And I PLAINLY stated that in my VERY first post! Which was to say that I didn't like Clemson SIMPLY because the line opened up at 3.5, and that would make the novice/suckers take the +3.5 thinking that they might win by a half a point!
That is ALL I ever meant and STILL is!
I don't give a damn about what happens to a line "during the week" you goon! A line that didn't OPEN at 2.5 or 3.5, or 6.5 or 7.5 means NOTHING to my original post you moron! LOL When Vegas moves a line during the week they are just trying to equal out the action on both sides! How could you not know that kid??!!
And If the Patriots OPENED at 7.5 (I never saw that they were 7.5) then my bet would be on THEM you noober!
PLEASE Get this straight Eddy Dummy, I don't like Clemson because Vegas put the OPENING line out at 3.5 to get the sucker money to take Clemson! That is IT! Don't try to make it anything else! If you want to talk about that, then we will. If you want to call names and change the subject, then we are just wasting time!
And yes, me taking +2.5 and +6.5 on games that Vegas OPENED at those numbers, has been VERY profitable to me. Mainly because it is the opposite of what most novice/losers bet when they see those 2 numbers. I simply bet on the side that Vegas & the bookie have. That's IT!! Please be my guest and watch and see how often those number win! It is incredible! You don't even have to look at who is playing, just bet those numbers and you don't even have to watch the game!!
And The bookie often gives me head because I bet these lines. He often tells me that EVERYBODY but me & him have the other side! And I just smile and wait for them all to lose and for me & the bookie to win. It happens very often.
If you want to talk about you being on the side of the novice/public because you have taken +3.5 on Clemson, then lets do it! That's ALL I ever said originally, and that's STILL all I ever meant! I don't bet the public side of bets, I take the bookie side.
Would you like to #1. discuss this point or #2. continue to make a fool of yourself? The line is #1 minus 2.5!! LOL
(LOL I'll bet 10 grand that you pick #2!!)

[Ra77er]

I like this thread very much. Wall of text crits and right hooks all over the place.

[Eddy Munny]

Blowjob, you truly are a fukking idiot and I'd love nothing more than to tell you that to your face, but since you're a special needs individual, it wouldn't be a good look for me if I caved in your stupid, ugly mug with a real right hook that would probably reset your brain straight.

I only referred to the opening line because YOU originally stated opening line, then skipped on to something else, finally backpedaling into the opening line once again only when it was convenient to do so. In other words, you're all over the fukking place because your "system" is a house of cards.

Let me ask you this, Blowjob... if the actual OPENING LINE was all you meant and all you ever meant, then why were YOU the one to bring up the Jets and the Dolphins? Those were YOUR submissions of "evidence" and YOU pushed those forth of YOUR own volition.

Hell, it's in your best interest to include those games because if you don't, then your laughable system falls to 1-4 on the weekend. Here's your card with wins and losses against the opening line as bet according to your golden rule:

Texans +6.5 W
Bills +2.5 L
Saints +2.5 L
Cowboys -3.5 L
Patriots -7.5 (opening line) L

Lmao, 1-4 you fukking asshat. Go back to night school, brush up on your basic arithmetic, and get back to me once you can come to terms with the fact that 20% is not 70% and it would take several lifetimes of uncanny luck to flip 20% into 70%.

Now, for argument's sake, and to assist you in your cause (because you need all the help you can get) I'll kindly include the Jets and Dolphins games for which you were so eager to announce to the world as winners by your system. That now bumps your record to 3-4. THREE WINS AND FOUR LOSSES!



On what fukking planet is 3-4 a 70% clip?

You truly are a fukking retard and the fact that your bookie accepts fellatio from you must be an insult to his penis. GTFO dunce!

[blowjoe2020]

LOL Eddy Dummy, look at my last post! I told you that you'd pick #2 and continue to make a fool of yourself!! I win 10 grand!!
I've already told you that you cant read that good! Look at my original post and you will see that I said OPENING lines are all that matter! Not lines that MOVE to those 4 numbers! We have already settled this TWICE! But for the THIRD time:
The only 2 OPENING lines that qualified in the pros this week were Houston +6.5 and Ravens +6.5. So THIS week it went 1 and 1. I've also told you that going against the public/novices and taking +2.5 and + 6.5 has been very profitable to me for many years. But that is probably all your brain can comprehend, is one week, and some juvenile post of "It didn't go 65% THIS week did it?" LOL I don't give a damn what it did in one week! I don't take the novice/public side! I take the side of Vegas & the bookie! PERIOD! You got that chump?!!
So STOP trying to change the subject of what this thread and my ORIGINAL post to you is all about!
Because when someone tries to change the subject from the point of the original statement, then they are just flat out ADMITTING that they are wrong! So they try to change the subject!
That's like a girl ED! you are doing what a girl would do when she is wrong!
SO, how about if I just stay on the original point no matter how juvenile and spread out YOU get? And say what I said in my ORIGINAL statement to you.
Which is that I didn't like Clemson SIMPLY because the line opened up at 3.5, and that would make the novice/suckers take the +3.5 thinking that they might win by a half a point! That's ALL I ever said originally, and that's STILL all I ever meant! I don't bet the public side of bets, I take the bookie side.
If you want to talk about you being on the side of the novice/public because you have taken +3.5 on Clemson, then lets do it!
If not then keep changing the subject and admitting that you are wrong. So, for about the TENTH time!!....

Because you have Clemson +3.5, you are on the public/novice side of that bet. And I wouldn't take that side!

That's IT!! PERIOD! It may lose, it may win, who the hell knows? And who the hell cares? I just know that
I don't take the side that Vegas makes the suckers take by adding or subtracting a half a point off 3 or 7.
YOU GOT THAT CHUMP? Now would you care to discuss it? Or keep changing the subject?
Your choice kid. I just know that

[blowjoe2020]

Eddy Dummy, All you have to say is that when Vegas makes the line a half a point from 3 flat or 7 flat that you don't believe it influences the side that the novice/suckers are going to take! And then this is over!
But you KNOW that it influences the suckers, so you start changing the subject! I promise that I never meant for you to make a fool of yourself on here trying to change the subject.

I only made my original reply to this thread to say that since Vegas made the opening line +3.5, that Clemson is the sucker side.
So stay on point and talk about how you know that you are on the public/novice side of your Clemson +3.5 bet, but you still think Clemson is the winner.
Or keep changing the subject like a foolish kid. Who gives a damn!

[JayDr3am]

Blowjob, you truly are a fukking idiot and I'd love nothing more than to tell you that to your face, but since you're a special needs individual, it wouldn't be a good look for me if I caved in your stupid, ugly mug with a real right hook that would probably reset your brain straight.

I only referred to the opening line because YOU originally stated opening line, then skipped on to something else, finally backpedaling into the opening line once again only when it was convenient to do so. In other words, you're all over the fukking place because your "system" is a house of cards.

Let me ask you this, Blowjob... if the actual OPENING LINE was all you meant and all you ever meant, then why were YOU the one to bring up the Jets and the Dolphins? Those were YOUR submissions of "evidence" and YOU pushed those forth of YOUR own volition.

Hell, it's in your best interest to include those games because if you don't, then your laughable system falls to 1-4 on the weekend. Here's your card with wins and losses against the opening line as bet according to your golden rule:

Texans +6.5 W
Bills +2.5 L
Saints +2.5 L
Cowboys -3.5 L
Patriots -7.5 (opening line) L

Lmao, 1-4 you fukking asshat. Go back to night school, brush up on your basic arithmetic, and get back to me once you can come to terms with the fact that 20% is not 70% and it would take several lifetimes of uncanny luck to flip 20% into 70%.

Now, for argument's sake, and to assist you in your cause (because you need all the help you can get) I'll kindly include the Jets and Dolphins games for which you were so eager to announce to the world as winners by your system. That now bumps your record to 3-4. THREE WINS AND FOUR LOSSES!



On what fukking planet is 3-4 a 70% clip?

You truly are a fukking retard and the fact that your bookie accepts fellatio from you must be an insult to his penis. GTFO dunce!

the way you insult people is quite impressive

[blowjoe2020]

LOL yeah Eddy Dummy has gone from totally forgetting about me telling him that he was on the novice/public side of Clemson +3.5! And now he has "changed it" to lying and taking a WRONG one week snapshot of a method that I have been winning with for years! (Only 2 bets in the NFL qualified this week and they went 1-1! Nowhere near what this idiot dreams up!)
LOL But hey If you are wrong about the original subject, then just quit talking about it and make a fool of yourself on another subject!
I'm still wondering if he will EVER post about the original subject again!!
Which is simply that I said he was on the novice/public side with Clemson +3.5!
And I don't take the public side of bets! The kid lost his mind and won't even address my original post anymore!! LOL
Any bets on whether he EVER posts about that original subject again? LOL I bet he doesn't!

[quitefrankle]

[PhattDaddy204]

I side with blowjoe2020

Sharp in my book.

Eddy your fighting a dead horse. Obviously blowjoe2020 smart not retarded. Look at the wonderful write ups explaining his position.

[Ra77er]

Dad#204 I sense some bias here.

Eddy has made some entertaining, fact checking responses to 20/20.

20/20 has not shied away nor shown any signs of slowing down the defensive wall of texts to continue proving his point and even continues to needle Eddy with the novice terminology.

Dad#204 regardless... this will be a good game to watch. PS its you're not your.

[Eddy Munny]

I'm changing the subject? The subject (at the moment) is your flimsy ass theory which you claim has a 70% success rate and I haven't wavered from my opposition of this theory since you foisted it upon this thread. You're the one pushing an agenda, assclown... I'm just punching holes in it left and right. And there's obviously more holes in it than swiss cheese. I think you should just now refer to it as the "Swiss Cheese System."

All you care about is opening lines yet you quickly got on this board and pronounced that you had gone 3-0 after Sunday. Now you say you're 1-1. How did you go from three wins to just one win unless you were full of shit from the get-go and were trying to pull the wool over everyone's eyes?

(Betcha Blowjob just dances around the above question for the umpteenth time)

And speaking of questions you refuse to answer... Why do the following three games not qualify for your Swiss Cheese System? The Opening Lines were as follows:

Bills +2.5
Saints +2.5
Cowboys -3.5

Those three point-spreads fall directly into your Swiss Cheese betting system and all three lost. So that places you at 1-4 or 20%.

You can jive-talk and double-speak all you want. I'll just refute your poppycock with cold hard facts and win the day each and every time.

Until you step up and explain why those games are not counted towards your wins and losses, you're just wasting keystrokes.

I'll sum up your entire position as it pertains to your Swiss Cheese System, and my cross-examination of it, in this nifty little courtroom exchange... Just so you don't get lost, you're Jim Carrey in this clip.

[Eddy Munny]

Dad#204 I sense some bias here.

Eddy has made some entertaining, fact checking responses to 20/20.

20/20 has not shied away nor shown any signs of slowing down the defensive wall of texts to continue proving his point and even continues to needle Eddy with the novice terminology.

Dad#204 regardless... this will be a good game to watch. PS its you're not your.

Yeah, Phattdaddy is letting his bias cloud his judgement. Let's be honest, Daddy is siding with Blowjob simply because Daddy started a thread about Ohio State -3.5 and Blowjob is basically reinforcing this stance, even if by hilariously flawed logic. Nonetheless, Blowjob agrees with the Ohio State pick and anybody that strokes Daddy's ego is good peoples in Daddy's book.

As far as the "novice" word goes... Trust me, I'm not bothered by it. I already know I make more cash than this Blowjob clown and if my system bombed to the tune of 20%, I'd probably just take a hike instead of frantically trying to muddy the waters in an effort to deceive people into believing that maybe I was correct all along.

The facts are there for the taking. People can check for themselves if they care to. That's the beauty of it all... I'm not expressing opinions here. The facts toppled his house of cards in a single weekend. I understand it's a relatively small sample size, but for someone claiming 70%.... a 1-4 faceplant doesn't portend anything promising over the long-run.

Basically Blowjob is just angry because he thought he was gonna waltz right in here and kick a moonshot that everyone would applaud, and instead got the ball snatched away at the last second...

[Ra77er]

Well it looks like I've now tagged myself in this thread. I, for the record have not decided on what to take here. I have a play on the other game however in fairness..

The issue I see accounting for those specific games cited is this....what book does 20/20 use to gauge his numbers on? The consensus numbers that are tossed out in Vegas before Pinnacle puts them up are different. That is the key to understanding his point.

Buffalo I see officially opened +1 on December 4 2016 at 6:53 pm. 4 days later it is at +2.5 at 2:39pm.
Dolphins did open at +2.5 on the same day as Buffalo and bounced all over until +2.5 again on the 10th.

I am not taking a side here simply saying this is "tricky" to say the least. Who is to say my numbers are accurate from the line service I use or who is to say what book 20/20 is using to base his 70% theory on? It's certainly flimsy but can be argued still.

[Ra77er]

Well its even on SBR Odds for Pinnacle

Beefalo +1.5
DAL-3

NO +2.5 Loss
AZ +2.5 Loss
GB +2.5 Win
NE -7.5 Loss

1-3 on his thesis according to SBR Pinny Opener.

Buff and Dal did not fit criteria.

[Eddy Munny]

Well it looks like I've now tagged myself in this thread. I, for the record have not decided on what to take here. I have a play on the other game however in fairness..

The issue I see accounting for those specific games cited is this....what book does 20/20 use to gauge his numbers on? The consensus numbers that are tossed out in Vegas before Pinnacle puts them up are different. That is the key to understanding his point.

Buffalo I see officially opened +1 on December 4 2016 at 6:53 pm. 4 days later it is at +2.5 at 2:39pm.
Dolphins did open at +2.5 on the same day as Buffalo and bounced all over until +2.5 again on the 10th.

I am not taking a side here simply saying this is "tricky" to say the least. Who is to say my numbers are accurate from the line service I use or who is to say what book 20/20 is using to base his 70% theory on? It's certainly flimsy but can be argued still.

I agree it's tricky, and it's vagueness is one of myriad of problems with it. The true opening number is available only in Vegas for a relatively short time before it moves to what I guess you could call the "mainstream" opening number that you get on your online sportsbooks. Your average "square" is not hitting that early opening number on the Strip, though, so that's why Blowjob's mission statement is tenuous at best.

That is also why I made it a point to hone in on the prevailing number that is being dangled in front of the general public for most of the week... Face it, if the books wanted to "lure" action to the underdog, then they'll hang a +3.5 for the majority of the betting period, and be reluctant to move off of that number even when receiving heavy underdog action. That tells us that the books are somewhat sided with the chalk.

That's what I meant when I proposed looking at not necessarily the opener or closer (that's often short-lived anyways) but the number that was available for the bulk of the week... But I said that and Blowjob just lost his shit because he thinks I'm tap-dancing when in reality I'm only trying to produce a clearer picture and one that's easiest to digest.

Fine, whatever.... if he takes a hard stance on the opener, he still has to define a few things, because, like you said, that opens a whole other can of worms. What it also does is give his dumbass more flexibility to tailor the Swiss Cheese System however he sees fit, in an effort to make it appear more lucrative than it really is.

At the end of the day, people need to learn how to pick winners. There is no magic formula. He is trying to push the SC system as a 70% winner, which, in effect, would make it a magic formula. I call bullshit. That's it.

He'll cry and cry about it like a baby with diaper rash, but that's because he Charlie Brown'd himself into the ground.

House of Cards!

Swiss Cheese!

Fraud!

Charlatan!

Scamburger!

Snake Oil Salesman!

Oh, did I mention he routinely performs fellatio on his bookie to cover his debts? Yeah, he does that too.

[blowjoe2020]

I'm sorry Eddy Dummy, but I didn't even read all of the last one! NOT ONE WORD BY YOU ABOUT CLEMSON IN THREE STRAIGHT POSTS?? LOL What did I say in my last post? Here it is:

"I'm still wondering if he will EVER post about the original subject again!!
Which is simply that I said he was on the novice/public side with Clemson +3.5!
And I don't take the public side of bets! The kid lost his mind and won't even address my original post anymore!! LOL
Any bets on whether he EVER posts about that original subject again? LOL I bet he doesn't!"

LOL I win again Eddy Dummy! You are like putty in my hands kid! I've got you more balled up than a teenage school girl. And I never even meant that!

It is obvious that you don't even want to address the fact that I ONLY dislike Clemson because the line is +3.5. And I don't take + 3.5! PERIOD! Because for the 8th time! When Vegas makes an OPENING line 2.5 or 3.5, or 6.5 or 7.5 then it is aimed at getting the sucker/novices to take the extra half a point thinking that the score might land on exactly 3 or 7 and then the half a point will "matter".
So for that reason, I don't take lines that OPEN UP at +3.5, or minus 2.5, or +7.5 or minus 6.5. I take the OTHER side of those 2 lines or I just don't bet!
And also for the EIGHTH TIME! Me taking the side of the bookie on those 4 lines has been very profitable for YEARS now! And also for the EIGHTH TIME, I don't care what those lines did in ONE week! ESPECIALLY when you just lie and willy-nilly make up lines that really didn't OPEN at those numbers! Even some other poster made a fool out of you lying about some of those games! LOL I'm not talking about ONE week of you lying! I'M TALKING ABOUT YEARS WORTH OF ME DOING IT!!
I also said it wins about 65 OR 70% of the time for me over a BUNCH of YEARS!
Not 1 week! But yet you continue to post ONLY the 70% part and not the 65% part! LOL Once again that is juvenile kid.
Even you say "I understand it's a relatively small sample size" Well DUH! You take a one week lying snapshot of my system one week when it goes 1 and 1, and then you lie and make up several other losers that didn't even qualify! LOL
So once again EDDY DUMMY, your names fits you, because you sure are dumb!

So for the EIGHTH time! I don't like Clemson SIMPLY because the line OPENED at +3.5 and I don't take +3.5.
Would you like to discuss that? Or will you change the subject again?
You please take +3.5 all you want to! I don't give a flying sheit!
Just stop making a fool of yourself on here! I never meant for you to do that kid!
Take care.

[blowjoe2020]

LOL Thanks razz77. The lines are sometimes different at every sportsbook, or everyplace that you visit in Vegas. That is why this week only 2 lines fit the system. Which were 2 games that opened at +6.5 allover the place. So it went 1 and 1 this week! Who cares about one week, I plainly said I've been doing it for YEARS!
I don't even run around picking these games and betting them, I simply said in my first post that IF I am going to bet a game, then I would never take +3.5 because it is the sucker/novice side. Nor would I take minus 2.5 or +7.5 or minus 2.5, because those are sucker lines geared toward taking the novice/public's money. And it has worked out very nicely over the years for me to take the "bookie side" of these lines.

And this Eddy Dummy kid has ASSUMED that that means I called HIM a novice for taking Clemson +3.5! LOL
And he has gone absolutely bat-sheit crazy-psycho on me on here! LOL
He has now gone to making posts about me with cartoons in them that have NOTHING to do with his Clemson +3.5 bet! LOL All simply because I told him in my very first original post that I don't bet +3.5 if a line opens up at 3.5, because that is the sucker/novice side.

LOL the kid has lost his gourd!

[Eddy Munny]

You're just sinking in quicksand. You're buried. You may as well journey to the center of the earth while you're down there. Anyone with an IQ above room temperature can see that your entire manifesto proclaiming 70% is a total bust and you're looking for an exit strategy.

You keep bringing up Clemson +3.5... anything to draw attention away from your Swiss Cheese System, correct? I'll humor you for a second. Sure, I like Clemson. You don't, because the Swiss Cheese strategy dictates that you jump on the other side. So we disagree on that game. What more is there to discuss?

The whole dialogue since my original post veered into a different direction once you pushed forth the Swiss Cheese System. Now you wanna act like that never happened? And that we should just ignore it to save you the embarrassment? Sounds like surrender to me.

First you announced it went 3-0. Now you're resigned to 1-1. How do you lose two wins in hindsight? You're just making this shit up as you go along. I graded it as 1-4. For what it's worth, a neutral third party checked in and stated the system went 1-3. You're just settling for 1-1 because that's apparently the best available option and the one that leaves you with the least amount of egg on your face.

You're like a dog chasing it's own tail and your efforts to cover your tracks are pure slapstick comedy. Keep digging, Blowjob. Keep digging. The hole grows deeper with every post you make.

[PhattDaddy204]

you're just sinking in quicksand. You're buried. You may as well journey to the center of the earth while you're down there. Anyone with an iq above room temperature can see that your entire manifesto proclaiming 70% is a total bust and you're looking for an exit strategy.

You keep bringing up clemson +3.5... Anything to draw attention away from your swiss cheese system, correct? I'll humor you for a second. Sure, i like clemson. You don't, because the swiss cheese strategy dictates that you jump on the other side. So we disagree on that game. What more is there to discuss?

The whole dialogue since my original post veered into a different direction once you pushed forth the swiss cheese system. Now you wanna act like that never happened? And that we should just ignore it to save you the embarrassment? Sounds like surrender to me.

First you announced it went 3-0. Now you're resigned to 1-1. How do you lose two wins in hindsight? You're just making this shit up as you go along. I graded it as 1-4. For what it's worth, a neutral third party checked in and stated the system went 1-3. You're just settling for 1-1 because that's apparently the best available option and the one that leaves you with the least amount of egg on your face.

You're like a dog chasing it's own tail and your efforts to cover your tracks are pure slapstick comedy. Keep digging, blowjob. Keep digging. The hole grows deeper with every post you make.

eddy go to vegas massage parlor off strip. You need some smoke and stoke.

Relax

[PhattDaddy204]

LOL Thanks razz77. The lines are sometimes different at every sportsbook, or everyplace that you visit in Vegas. That is why this week only 2 lines fit the system. Which were 2 games that opened at +6.5 allover the place. So it went 1 and 1 this week! Who cares about one week, I plainly said I've been doing it for YEARS!
I don't even run around picking these games and betting them, I simply said in my first post that IF I am going to bet a game, then I would never take +3.5 because it is the sucker/novice side. Nor would I take minus 2.5 or +7.5 or minus 2.5, because those are sucker lines geared toward taking the novice/public's money. And it has worked out very nicely over the years for me to take the "bookie side" of these lines.

And this Eddy Dummy kid has ASSUMED that that means I called HIM a novice for taking Clemson +3.5! LOL
And he has gone absolutely bat-sheit crazy-psycho on me on here! LOL
He has now gone to making posts about me with cartoons in them that have NOTHING to do with his Clemson +3.5 bet! LOL All simply because I told him in my very first original post that I don't bet +3.5 if a line opens up at 3.5, because that is the sucker/novice side.

LOL the kid has lost his gourd!

Blowjoe I'm totally aboard and you have crushed EDDY IMO

[blowjoe2020]

LOL Thanks Phattdaddy! As for Eddy Dummy, thanks for coming back to earth & talking about Clemson kid! I don't want Clemson simply because I don't take +3.5 if the line opened at that. And as far as a "system" goes, hell yes me only betting the "bookie sides" of the 4 lines that I mentioned, HAS gone off at a 65 OR 70% clip for me personally.

But hell, in the last 20 years there has probably been 10 thousand of those type of lines, so hell, of course neither one of us knows if it has really won 6500 times or more out of 10 thousand!
Go look at my FIRST post about it again. I never said that I bet EVERY single line that opens at those 4 numbers! I said that for ME it is the only thing that has consistently won about 65 or 70% of the time.
So that is why I wouldn't take Clemson +3.5. Because I don't take +3.5. I either take minus 3.5 or I don't bet!
I said that people taking +3.5 are on the "novice" side, and you assumed that I was calling YOU a novice, and you absolutley went crazy!

This should be the end of this now, but who knows! Keep on, I don't care! I don't know who is going to win the game, I just know that since the line opened up at 3.5, then I wouldn't take +3.5.
Whatever else you "assumed" or made up, I can't help that!
That is all.

[Eddy Munny]

Even Chuck knows 1-4 isn't 70%

[wildbill044]

You guys are certainly entertaining and neither of you are stupid. I must say that even though I am with PhD on this pick because he totally rules football, plus born and raised in Ohio I'm a huge Bucks fan, I gotta hand it to Eddie for his particularly astute posts. You are well read sir.


sorry joe, tried to give you a couple points also but you can't receive them?

[blowjoe2020]

Why can't I receive points? Is that only for pros?

[Eddy Munny]

Why can't I receive points? Is that only for pros?

I wouldn't worry about it. Your bookie won't accept betpoints as a valid form of payment.

It's either cash or head. You know the game.

[blowjoe2020]

And by the way Eddy Dummy, I am Joe Cool , not Chuck!

[blowjoe2020]

And by the way Wildbill whenever some dumb kid like Eddy Dummy takes something that I have been doing profitably for over 20 years and then tries to "condense" it down to one week, AND THEN lies about the opening lines, then that is FAR from "astute"!
LOL That is asinine and "3rd gradish"
I never even said I bet those lines EVERY TIME or EVERY WEEK! LOL it's just another something that Eddy Dummy dreamed up because he "assumed" that I called him a novice!
I never did, but he has been crying & whining ever since! And his little girl panties have been in a wad ever since!
LOL

[Eddy Munny]

Explain to us again how you were so excited to tell the peanut gallery that you went 3-0 using the Swiss Cheese System, then shit your pants and amended the record to 1-1, only after myself and another member pointed out glaring inconsistencies in your claim?

(This is the part where you hastily bring up the Clemson game or splatter the board with a wall of chaotic text and edit it multiple times)

[blowjoe2020]

No I don't have to "explain" anything to a kid who is trying to "poo-poo" something that has been profitable to me for YEARS!
Especially when you try to condense it down to ONE DAMN week and then lie about the opening lines! LOL
So Once again, I never even said I bet those lines EVERY TIME or EVERY WEEK! LOL it's just another something that you have dreamed up because you "assumed" that I called you a novice!
I never did, but you have been crying & whining ever since! And your little girl panties have been in a wad ever since!
LOL
I never meant for you to get like that kid!

So How about this Eddy Dummy:
I don't give a sheit what lines you bet, or what you think of me for not betting lines that are +3.5!
Try not to give a sheit what lines I bet either kid!
You got that?

[blowjoe2020]

Hey Eddy Dummy, there are 3 pro-lines out at Betonline that are some of those 4 that I mentioned. I don't give a damn because I'm not going to bet them, but why don't you "monitor" the games and see which side wins & give a report on here about it? LOL

And So Once again, I never even said I bet those lines EVERY TIME or EVERY WEEK! LOL it's just another something that you have dreamed up because you "assumed" that I called you a novice!
I never did, but you have been crying & whining ever since! And your little girl panties have been in a wad ever since!
LOL
I never meant for you to get like that kid!

So How about this Eddy Dummy:
I don't give a sheit what lines you bet, or what you think of me for not betting lines that are +3.5!
Try not to give a sheit what lines I bet either kid!
You got that?

[Ra77er]

Well I thought Eddy had it here but appears this guy is not going down quietly. I currently have it scored 5-4.

[Ra77er]

Lets forget about the opening number and 70% systems and get on the game.

Theories floating around about playing chalk on NY's games, Clemson's season being underwhelming, and Urban being the better coach.

Clemson was runner up last year and played Bama close, they can get after the QB and Deshaun could have a monster game that some have been expecting.

USA Today says Clemson 38-34. I actually liked the thought process behind the selection but they probably also selected Hilary to win so take that as you will. I haven't finished listening to PS podcast but whomever he chooses probably going to sway some opinions.

[Eddy Munny]

Okay, so he didn't bring up the Clemson game to divert attention from his Swiss Cheese folly, but that's more than likely because I stated he would, so he had to call an audible or risk telegraphing his plays. Understood. He's a slow learner, but he did make an adjustment.

What he didn't do, however, was tackle my question head on. He'll always be predictable on that front because he really has no other options. It's either sidestep the question, or get upskirted for all the forum to see.

He says I lied about the opening lines. Really? Lol, I have no reason to do that. I'm not the one on the soapbox selling the Swiss Cheese System. He tried to claim 3-0 with the joyous ebullience of a conquistador seizing new land, then recoiled in horror when he realized there might be checks and balances that expose his charade. Hell, even an impartial third party chimed in and graded his weekend at 1-3.

So Blowjob initially does a 3-0 victory dance despite an objective outsider finding only 1 win against 3 losses? How does Blowjob reconcile that? I guess we'll never know because he seemingly has 1001 ways to skirt the subject. At the very least though, you would think this clown could refrain from calling others a "liar" when he was clearly the one with his hand caught in the cookie jar.

Now his latest cop-out is insisting that you have to give the system a 20 year window before the 70% yields bear themselves out. Riiight... that's what we'll do then.

One bad week? No problem.

One bad year? Not an issue.

An off-decade? Unfortunate, but no reason to panic.

Just give it the full 20 fukking years before you render judgement on the Swiss Cheese System. It's only fair.

In other words, you could have a baby tomorrow, and that baby would legally be smoking cigarettes and voting for presidents before Blowjob's Swiss Cheese System will have fulfilled one full betting cycle according to him.

GTFO!

[blowjoe2020]

LOL Eddy Dummy, I should have posted in an earlier post that you would start to feel so inferior that you would start copying me! I love you copying me and telling me what I might do & then saying you were right! Hmmm where'd you get that kid? Oh from me! LOL I told you TWICE what you would do in your next posts and I was right BOTH times! And then you copy me & start telling me what I will do! Thanks kid. imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.
But Next time try to be original instead of a 3rd grade "copy cat". What the hell will you do next?
A "nanna-nanna boo-boo? LOL

If you are only going copy my stuff & use it yourself, then what fun is that to me? I could just post & reply to myself and save the trouble! LOL
Anyway, back to point, I have no idea what the so called "System" has done for 10 or 20 years! Nor do I care!
Like I said, it has worked for me 65 OR 70% of the time over a lot of years! Try it yourself, if you don't like it, (or if you want to take a lying 1 week snapshot of it) then don't use it! I DON'T GIVE A SHEIT!
I don't like Clemson +3.5 because the line opened at +3.5 and that is often a sucker line. Who knows if it will ring true in this game? Nobody.
End of story.

[Eddy Munny]

You're right... Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. So you can only imagine how tickled I was when you started posting Peanuts characters to convey whatever warped thought was passing through your feeble mind at the moment. If you can't beat 'em join 'em, right?

Most all of your posts just have the general look of somebody in a very agitated, panicked state. You must be distraught that I've pulled back the curtain on your Swiss Cheese System and exposed you with your panties down.

I mean, just look at the state of you. Your posts are just these chaotic streams-of-consciousness that really amount to nothing more than a testament to the scrambled, disorganized mess in your head. Only recently to you begin to break up the wall of words with spacing, but you're still bogged down by worthless, redundant rants that do nothing to absolve you, but only further illustrate the fact that you're a butthurt bumpkin.

Then there's the varying font size, random uses of CAPS, arbitrarily placed emoticons, the list goes on. Hell, you've even resorted to copying and pasting your past posts to use in more recent posts. You're literally recycling old posts now because your brain has apparently blown a fuse from the massive amounts of stress. And that's not even mentioning the fact that you edit about 2/3 of your posts because you're as indecisive as a chick contemplating what to wear on prom night.

The text style isn't even consistent in your last post... another cut-and-pasted Frankenstein hatchet job punctuated with the requisite frantic edit. At least your posts have gotten progessively shorter, I'll give you that. Let's face it, your longer-winded efforts at first glance just look like the alphabet vomited all over the computer screen.

I guess I shouldn't expect much more coming from a middling pie-peddler from the South.