The return of the points had nothing to do with bobo's decision to stiff try...tat sent the points back here:
BBE735 3/31/2016
5:00 PMtatddy downsouth Player Transfer -100,000
[COLOR=#000000 !important]1,068.00[/COLOR]
On March 31st. Bobbo refused to pay the bet well before that on 2/27 at 1500:
See how here he was calling it a gift, and declaring it was implied that gifts weren't OK? This was not even 2 hours after DS accepted and won the wager, and we have bobbo acknowledging that it was a gift
After he got beat up on that, he fell back to considering it a loan instead (without any evidence). Regardless, as you can see, the return of the points wasn't bobbo's reason for considering it a loan at the time and refusing to pay; he simply took what DS clearly stated as a gift and declared it a loan with not a shred of evidence to support it.
As I said above, even if it was a loan, the terms didn't prohibit loans; they only prohibited soliciting loans, which tat hasn't done. Just like making a wager or a gift, the loan doesn't break bobbos terms. There's simply no way for bobbo to believe the bet wasn't won by his own words, and his shifting excuses expose the fact he just plain wants to stiff