 SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks |
Best Sportsbooks List
|
|
| |||||
| #1 FanDuel | SBR rating 4.8/5 | Review | #6 BetRivers | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review | #2 Caesars | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #7 Fanatics | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review |
| #3 DraftKings | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #8 Betway | SBR rating 3.8/5 | Review | ||
| #4 BetMGM | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #9 Borgata | SBR rating 3.5/5 | Review | ||
| #5 bet365 | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #10 ClutchBet | SBR rating 2.9/5 | Review | ||
Supreme Court Approves State Sports Betting
Daniel Wallach @WALLACHLEGAL 6m6 minutes ago
BREAKING: U.S. Supreme Court rules that federal ban on state-sanctioned sports betting is unconstitutional. Decides case in favor of New Jersey. Floodgates now officially open for other states to allow sports betting
|
This post was nominated 1
time
. To view the nominated thread please click here.
People who nominated: PromiseLand
|
With Gorsuch, everything’s is going to the states.
Lets see who’s second
Hell to the yeah!
Yes! Please allow it in Michigan. We have 3 fukking Casinos right downtown.
"Congress can regulate sports gambling directly, but if it elects not to do so, each State is free to act on its own."
"PAPSA is not consistent with the Constitution"
Out freaking standing
Legal Sports Betting Is Coming To US, As New Jersey Wins Supreme Court Case
Dustin Gouker, May 14, 2018
It’s game on for sports betting in New Jersey, and perhaps the rest of the country as well.
The state of New Jersey won its US Supreme Court case, as a majority of justices declared that the federal ban on sports wagering is unconstitutional.
More on the backstory of NJ sports betting here. Previously, single-game wagering was legal in the US only via the Nevada sports betting industry.
Here is the conclusion of the majority opinion:
The legalization of sports gambling requires an important policy choice, but the choice is not ours to make. Congress can regulate sports gambling directly, but if it elects not to do so, each State is free to act on its own. Our job is to interpret the law Congress has enacted and decide whether it is consistent with the Constitution. PASPA is not. PASPA “regulate[s] state governments’ regulation” of their citizens. …. The Constitution gives Congress no such power. The judgment of the Third Circuit is reversed.
SCOTUS impacts on sports betting
The real-world applications of the verdict:
New Jersey can now move forward with its plans to legalize wagering. Some gaming facilities in the state have indicated it could be just a matter of weeks until sportsbooks are operations.
West Virginia sports betting and Mississippi sports betting are also prepared to move forward with laws on the books.
So can Pennsylvania, which legalized sports wagering in 2017. A PA sports betting rollout there is up in the air, but could come later this year.
Sports betting legislation advancing in a number of states can take effect immediately upon passage.
A quick timeline of the case
New Jersey enacted a law in 2014 in which it partially repealed its own sports betting ban. That law was an attempt to allow the state’s casinos and horse betting tracks to offer sports wagering by working around a federal law, the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act. That law bans single-game wagering outside of Nevada sports betting.
The NCAA and the major US pro sports leagues — NFL, NBA, MLB and NHL — along with the NCAA filed suit to stop the law from taking effect. The leagues have standing under PASPA to bring suits that authorize sports betting.
Over the next three years, New Jersey lost in both federal district court and the US Third Circuit Court of Appeals. New Jersey then appealed the case to the US Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court agreed to hear New Jersey’s appeal in the summer of 2017.
Oral arguments took place in December; many believed the hour of conversation between justices and counsel went well for New Jersey.
In your face Roger Goodell
Passed 7-2
Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor dissented.
It's unreal to me, I never thought I would see this day....Watch congress attempt to fsck this up
Offshore is going to grow like you’ve never seen
Unless they pass a bill blocking every state I do not think that we have to worry.Originally Posted by hubie69
On the surface, this sounds good. We all can place bets without breaking the law or needing to be in Vegas. I'll temper my enthusiasm until I see how much the states screw it up. Putting your faith in the state or federal government generally is not a wise thing to do.
Liberals. Vote in November
Death to online Sports books?
|
|
How long before I can bet at Pinnacle again and fund my account with Neteller?
|
|
I could see jj setting up shop on a corner somewhere in NJ
This has always been my dream fellas - =}
|
This post was nominated 1
time
. To view the nominated thread please click here.
People who nominated: hubie69
|
No
Likely growth
Just he opposite actually it grows
no way
don't hold your breath
Betting was not illegal on the federal level. Accepting the bet or transferring money to a known sports gambling establishment was illegal for the banks or financial institutions.
I think the opposite ikid. Remember this is convenient and legal. It doesn't mean well run. Remember it's our local and federal government at the helm.
What if a new federal law bans off shore?
|
|
I’ll be 99 before by the time Texas allows a bet to be placed.
Agreed
DK already tweets they are moving to offer sports betting. That was fast. Lol
Offshore yes.
Not at all unless the new legal books offer reduced odds.
Manny states will still not offer it because of the party system and anti-gambling
Reply With Quote
SouthBayGame gave ikid2groove415 1 SBR Point(s) for this post.
