[Murph_Smurf]

player should be paid.
but if you're such a bad gambler that you don't know how to milk an edge, this is what you can expect.

Couldn't agree more.

[UV82]

Now this douche bag is stalking me.

I am having fun ... don't spoil it.

at least you have become a bit more original with the names you are calling ... but still very low level.

I agree with SBR's Bill on this issue so why don't you attack him too. On second thought, why don't you just disappear.

Because Bill has the sense not support WSEX for the sake of supporting WSEX he expressed his view in pursuit of justice... which happened to correlate somewhat with yours and which statistically can happen once in a while.

... and you didn't answer my question:- when is your beloved bookie going to get their act together?

after all this mess happened because once again they dont have their act together.

[trixtrix]

was this ever resolved?

[DrunkHorseplayer]

They concluded that he was cheating by statistical analysis? Every single bet I make involves that. They made a mistake, he took advantage and he won; they should pay up promptly.

[ByeShea]

Doesn't even make sense to rig a casino, fuk its already rigged naturally wtf they need to double rig it?

Guy, all a casino or book, legal or otherwise wants to do is separate us from our money.

One of the best thing about sports betting is that we have no more control over the results we wager on than the entities that take our bets. If we play in an online casino, we forfeit that control. Gotta be an idiot to do that.

Plus, I've seen some the profit margins of an online casino - and they are absolutely unreal. Ultimately the money flows in one direction, even if accounts go in the black from time to time. Players almost never remove cash from the table.

My advice is never play online blackjack (or any table games) under any circumstances.

[Justin7]

The player did nothing wrong, except use his brain. WSEX did not make this right as far as I know.

[durito]

The player did nothing wrong, except use his brain. WSEX did not make this right as far as I know.

They couldn't pay even if they wanted too.

[lukahh]

let's see the statistics here:
he played 564 hands
he won almost all of his 100$ hands, which means he won about 150 to make $14.7k
he lost almost all of his 1$ hands = 564-150 = say about 400 hands.
-------
wsex "random number generator" was seemingly tilted into house favor 400/550, which is 72%. house EV on PaiGow is 50% plus comission.

so it's ok for online casino to tilt RNG, and it's not ok if player to find a way around the tilt?

[trixtrix]

wsex deserves a downgrade imo if they do not make this right

[BillyCostigan]

let's see the statistics here:
he played 564 hands
he won almost all of his 100$ hands, which means he won about 150 to make $14.7k
he lost almost all of his 1$ hands = 564-150 = say about 400 hands.
-------
wsex "random number generator" was seemingly tilted into house favor 400/550, which is 72%. house EV on PaiGow is 50% plus comission.

so it's ok for online casino to tilt RNG, and it's not ok if player to find a way around the tilt?

GREAT POST---EXACTLY!

Why are they allowed to cheat but the player can't find a way around it? Such bullshit.

[Justin7]

I'm not sure trixtrix's post reflects exactly what happened. I didn't see anything suggesting WSEX's advantage was different than normal if a player was flat-betting.

[trixtrix]

I'm not sure trixtrix's post reflects exactly what happened. I didn't see anything suggesting WSEX's advantage was different than normal if a player was flat-betting.

can you be more specific? which one of my posts are you referring to?

[Justin7]

can you be more specific? which one of my posts are you referring to?

you concluded that the game was somewhat rigged in favor of the casino. While I didn't look for that, your analysis has assumptions that are wrong (such as winning 100% of the big bets, and losing 100% of the small bets).

I still think WSEX is in the wrong here, but not for running a rigged game. They're in the wrong for stiffing a casino winner that that did the equivalent of counting cards.

[trixtrix]

look closer, i don't think it was my analysis you're referring to, i'm not good at maths, apparently only "cheating" myself out of 11k and then "crying" about it

[sq764]

its kinda scary to think any offshore book can lose big and tell you to go eff yourself

[wtt0315]

its this simple. if they say they have a random generator when they don't then they are ripping off everyone else who plays. If someone finds that and beats them, they should pay them and fix it. if not they should refund everyone who has every lost on that game. If i sell you chicken and tell you it's steak when its not i am decieving you. If they tell you their game is random when its not thats lying and cheating those who think it is. They should of paid this or refunded all who lost thinking it was random. If you say its random it needs to be random.

[bettilimbroke999]

WSEX is history, any book with even an ounce of integrity would've paid this guy off a long time ago, many other players there will be stiffed as well bc this book is flat broke and no one in their right mind would send them a deposit

[gman77]

They owe alot of people hope they get there%^$# together would like to make my house payment