 SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks |
Best Sportsbooks List
|
|
| |||||
| #1 FanDuel | SBR rating 4.8/5 | Review | #6 BetRivers | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review | #2 Caesars | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #7 Fanatics | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review |
| #3 DraftKings | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #8 Betway | SBR rating 3.8/5 | Review | ||
| #4 BetMGM | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #9 Borgata | SBR rating 3.5/5 | Review | ||
| #5 bet365 | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #10 ClutchBet | SBR rating 2.9/5 | Review | ||
Lawsuit.vs.easystreet,rx,and m.g.
I have currently hired a lawyer and pursuing my rights to recover all the 46k kept from me. I will use all means necessary to vindicate my position including the allegations that I cheated and the defamatory statements made by Easystreet and RX. To be continued.....
I hope it works out for u.
Nothing better than when a cheat gets a taste of his own medicine, at least the people you cheated were able to mark it off and move on with their lives.
Cory is going to have a chip on his shoulder for life after thisCory has learned a valuable lesson about cheating people and how it feels to be the one cheated.
If your lawyer has any success at all, he will find many more clients willing to sign on for Costa Rica court action.
I would stick to the stealing/cheating part of the lawsuit against EasyStreet, because the defamation of character issue will not fly with someone of your past transgressions.
Im on your side,but i dont get it. How you can sue them and you come from state that forbid gambling?
You wont get a fuckin cent. Instead of being out 46k now itll be 50k total when you include your lawyer expenses.
The lawyer could be an ambulance chaser. he probably want 40% of the 46KOriginally Posted by LostBankroll
I'm guessing this decision was inspired by Phil Ivey?
|
This post was nominated 1
time
. To view the nominated thread please click here.
People who nominated: LostBankroll
|
Any good lawyer would advise you not to talk about the case to anyone. In other words, you should stop posting about EZ.
3 months of slandering Easystreet 10x a day is not going to help your case at all. In fact you may end up owing them more money after they counter your slander charges with their own.
|
This post was nominated 1
time
. To view the nominated thread please click here.
People who nominated: stevenash
|
slander for what telling the truth? and I was advised to keep posting about Easy,just not the case.
Cory1111, are you from the United States?
What advice has the FBI given you?
I'm sure your attorney has said you have a case.
Has he hit you up for any money yet?
just do 46k in charge backs
How does m.g. figure into your lawsuit? Surely you don't intend to sabotage one of the few methods US bettors have left to deposit/withdraw?
lol seriously the lawyer is laughing all the way to the bank with this.. he makes money to send 1000$ letters to costa rica LOL.. hilarious.. he might even get a free vacation down there to go and talk it out with EZ.. ROFL
wtf is cory thinking here? total waste of money... u cannot sue someone over an illegal act.. wtf???
thats like suing a bank for the money exploding in purple dye after u robbed them.. ROFL
-stash
yes you can.
You have the ability to sue anyone for anything. The case will, in the vast majority of situations never be heard, for a varity of reasons, but you still have the ability and the right to file the paper work to sue.
Couple of points.
#1 IMO Cory has not, nor will he have paper work filed to sue EZ or the RX or **
#2 Assuming 1 was false, any lawyer he obtains is either a young lawyer with no current cases to generate income so he took this case on a win based fee %, OR If Cory is paying fees upfront, they will be very small, and done simply to get some paper work flowing to EZ in an attempt to "stir the pot" and maybe flush out a bird or 2.
#3 Assuming #1 was false No one from EZ or RX will be forced to come to the US for a 46,000 gambling case. Get real.
#4 The feds already now how players are moving small amounts in and out of books. Does ANYONE here really think it is some sort of secret?
#5 Assuming EZ cheated Cory, and Cory and his lawyer were to lay the whole case out in front of a US judge during pre-trial exploratory, and show copies of post and e-mails in this case, the only course of action the Judge would have would be to "ask" EZ to come to the US for trial, and EZ would tell them to get F#%ed, and the Judge would also ask for any and all info EZ had of any charge backs Cory had done with any business. (maybe EZ has info, maybe they don't) But assuming Ez and other books do have charge back info. The judge would have no other course of action but to charge Cory with CC fraud. Once again, that is assuming he has actualy charged back books as it has been posted. I have seen no proof he has charged anyone back, but have heard he has, at numerous books.
Cory as I stated, I think you are bluffing here, but hell who knows, maybe you aren't. Hell sometimes people do crazy shit. But be careful here, you may open up a real can of whoop ass ,, and it is going to be pointed at you.
NO judge has the desire or ability to make anyone from the RX or EZ come to the US for a trial, but the judge has the abilty and the OBLIGATION if they have reason to think you commited CC fraud IE: Charge backs, to punish you to the full extent of the law.
10+ counts of CC fraud, with INTENT. Damn dude, that is manditory prison time. NOT JAIL,...... prison.
Think back to just a few weeks ago when all the poker sites got slam-busted. What was the BIG ISSUE? U.S. banking laws. CC fraud is a BANKING LAW. Uncle Sam looks the other way at many many things. Banking Law isn't one of them. The IRS also takes gambling winning very serious. Keep in mind even if you can show that in 2008 you LOST more than you won, if you didn't file the winnings, you still filed an improper return. Many people think that just because you lost more than you won you don't have to report it, and that simply isn't true. Report the winnings, and than the losses, and you owe NOTHING, but it still must be reported. IRS takes this shit serious, just ask Pete Rose
Wow, talk about throwing your self into a pit of gas , while holding a match.
At the end of the day, I have NO REAL clue if you did any charge backs, at this point it is all he said/she said shit. But IF you did......... this can and will, get ugly, if you have a judge look at all the info in this case.
Nor do I have any idea if every year you have gambled, you have put your wins as well as your losses on your return (even if no taxes were due), but if you haven't. Rut Roh.......
Watch your step
On a side note, no court is going to charge Cory with any wrong doing, for gambling on-line even if he admited to doing so. It's the IRS and the returns not showing win/losses (even if no taxes were due), and the Banking Fraud (assuming there is any), that will lead to prison time.
Gl
Last edited by boatboatboat; 06-03-11 at 05:22 PM.
|
This post was nominated 1
time
. To view the nominated thread please click here.
People who nominated: secretstash
|
Wow... I don't know how this one would pan out?
1. If Cory lives in the US... technically you shouldn't be wagering in the first place. Don't know what attorney would take your case?
2. You're suppose to sue where the business is located. Aren't they out of the country? So, you would need an attorney from that country.
3. And honestly... I wouldn't take your case unless I received half. So I hope you're expecting around $23,000 back? Plus, once you receive these funds... and word gets out. You'd be taxed on these earnings. So... you'll lose another $7,590 or so. When everything is said and done... you might NET $15,410.00 (that doesn't include other related expenses... airline tickets... meetings... transportation... time... loss of work... etc.)
But hey... guess it's worth a shot?
Technically if a US judge wanted to prove a point to him... he could face small jail time 30-90 days. But, this case won't even happen anyways. His only decision would be to sue the operation on their turf. But it would be really expensive. You could hire an attorney locally here in the US to threaten EZ Street... but everyone is business minded in gambling... hard to break through ICE. Regardless, with all expenses and costs... Cory might walk away with 5-8k.
You are right, but no US court cares about the PLAYER. They care about #1 the bank (processor). #2 The taxes on gaming (cory have you claimed EVERY WIN?) but that is an IRS issue, but sure one that the IRS would be notified of in a situation like this, #3 the book maker
Yup, and damn near impossible in a situation like this. Cory was in the US they were in CR during the VP session. Court cost and lawyer fees travel would be 3 times 46k, and that is assuming EZ and the RZ would AGREE to fly back and forth to the various courts, WHICH THEY WON'T.
Yup. Here is 100 bucks, write me a good lawyer letter. FILE 13 here it comes. lol
ummmmmmmmmm, not sure what the number is based on. An international lawsuit with 2 venues? He wouldn't net a bowl of soup if he won.
Once again, IMO he is bluffing, but assuming he isn't. And assuming he REALLY did do charge backs (he may not have), all he is going to do here, is get his name on the IRS radar, and in trouble for CC fraud.
good luck cory. may be a long shot. but since you have no shot at easystreet admitting they are thefts, why not. may end up costing to you a few extra bucks, worth it. on the other hand it will at least cause more damage to the easystreet name.
Yah, and there's also that pesky little "Reglamento a la Ley de Juegos" in Costa Rica, so Costa Rica won't hear a gambling case. It's not allowed to begin with, and the law clearly states that the government will not intervene in the collection or payment of money owed, in either direction.
The case looks a tad frivolous with M*G* included.
Otherwise SBR has been sued by touts. The player is not breaking any laws by playing video poker online I guess?? TheRx did assist in scamming Cory so there may be a case there assuming both sides want to foot a mid to high 5 figure or even 6 figure legal bill.
Eye agree, but when you really think about it, he has a better chance with ** than RX or EZ for a variety of reasons. .000000009 % vs 0%.
Anyone can sue anyone. Having a court hear the case, and winning...........well, that is another thing all togather
That comment serves no purpose other then to add fuel to the fire. I'll leave it at that.
EZ and RZ wouldn't need to spend a penny. No US judge/court is going to order then to take part in a trial in the US or Costa Rica. Yes Cory will spend mid/high 5 figures (no way it would be 6 with no actual trial), but EZ and RZ won't spend a dime. Why would they? US court can't order them to do shit, and Costa Rica could care less about Cory1111.
At the end of the day the only people who will care about Cory1111 in this case are his lawyers billing clerk, the Feds, and the IRS........... oh, and maybe his friends (myself included) here at SBR.
When will people realize, that American citizens are not breaking a single law by placing bets on sports and/or gaming in an online casino?
This includes funding your account and cashing out via insert method here.
You're not breaking US laws, the books are.
|
This post was nominated 1
time
. To view the nominated thread please click here.
People who nominated: BigFish
|
your lawyer advised you to keep posting? I think you should hire a new lawyer. Anything you post on a forum could be used against you in any legal action that you pursued. Remember all those posts about Marvin and Alex's family? Remember all the slandering and insults you have put towards them? I hope you have time to edit about 1000 posts.
Eye love Oh-Nal-OH-gees.
This case reminds me of a dullard in a drunken stuper, driving his van onto the sidewalk in front of the police station. Opening the door and falling to the ground. Getting up, and staggering into the lobby. (all the while the officers are watching him thru the window).
The man pauses in the hall and pisses into a trash can in full view of the officers.
The man, stumbles over to the counter and says
Drunk man : "awfa-cer, I wanna we-port a crime. I bought this here gun (man pulls a 9mm from his urine soaked pockets), so I could kill my old lady, because the bitch, smoked all my crack I was going to sell to the school kids"
Police: "yes sir, go on"
Drunk man :" well........*hick-up* aw-Sea-fer, the gun don't work. I was on my way to my house to shoot her, and I stopped at the lick-her store to rob it, and when I tried to shoot the man working, dis here gun, wouldn't even work. The man who sold it two me, needs to be Ah-rest-TID"
Guess which part, Cory1111 plays. The police man, or the drunk man.
As long as you report both wins and losses on your tax return, and don't do charge backs (bank fraud) you are 100% correct sir.
Well, maybe 95% correct.
actually most states have laws against gambling and not just talking online. Most states are misdemeanors. Here is floridas law where i live.
849.08 Gambling.--
Whoever plays or engages in any game at cards, keno, roulette, faro or other game of chance, at any place, by any device whatever, for money or other thing of value, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083
heres a good site to see your states laws
http://www.gambling-law-us.com/State-Laws/
Good luck getting them served. Good luck getting them to make an appearance. If you default them, good luck collecting on your paper judgment.
Also, let me know if the 1-800-Lawyers is strong enough to defeat a multi-million dollar company (M.G) and also I am sure they would love to permanently blacklist your name for using their services to conduct gambling transactions (forbidden in their TOS) so at that point why would any lawyer even consider the idea of suing them?
Did the FBI give you this advice and the name of the Lawyer? Have you contacted Obama yet?
Reply With Quote
