Originally Posted by
dlowilly
These aren't tax advantages, they are tax breaks. There is nothing in any of those examples you gave that have high income as a requirement.
When federal income tax was originally introduced it was 1% on income over a high amount for the time. It has increased over time to the numbers you see now in the high 30%s. Saying that being reduced a few percentage points is a tax advantage while half the country pays no taxes is like saying Lebron has an advantage over us because he pays 48 million in taxes/yr instead of 49 million because he donated 3 million to charity.
I know none of what I say matters to you though, it's just a huge difference of opinion. WHen you see a reduction in what government takes from successful people you see it as unfair to poorer people, even though they aren't forbidden from the same tax rules and less taxes paid by the rich doesn't make them any poorer.
You will never be able to come up with a convincing argument why a progressive income tax is needed for anything other than a wasteful government. You just won't.