please fasten your seatbelts - next stop MarsOriginally Posted by nyplayer33
 SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks |
Best Sportsbooks List
|
|
| |||||
| #1 FanDuel | SBR rating 4.8/5 | Review | #6 BetRivers | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review | #2 Caesars | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #7 Fanatics | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review |
| #3 DraftKings | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #8 Betway | SBR rating 3.8/5 | Review | ||
| #4 BetMGM | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #9 Borgata | SBR rating 3.5/5 | Review | ||
| #5 bet365 | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #10 ClutchBet | SBR rating 2.9/5 | Review | ||
-
03-12-14 04:06 PM #176
Points Awarded:
sweep gave Russian Rocket 1 Betpoint(s) for this post.
MoneyLineDawg gave Russian Rocket 2 Betpoint(s) for this post.
-
03-12-14 04:55 PM #177
welp
looks like Chinese satellite images picked up pictures from Sunday morning exactly EAST of the designated travel path. an oil rig worker in the general area also reported seeing burning debris.
the images show 3 larges pieces of something floating. the largest one being 79x72 feet across or so.
looks like the whole turn WEST theory could be complete BS all along.
the plot thickens
-
03-12-14 05:16 PM #178
I'm sticking to my original opinion that this was an accident and not a terrorist act. Originally Posted by cloverfield
Unreal that CNN and other media outlets will post all these stupid rumors without any facts.
I still don't how the transponder got turned off but it could be lousy ATC and poor radar coverage.
-
03-12-14 05:22 PM #179
CNN especially goes out of their way to mention terrorism every 2 minutes on their reporting. Originally Posted by boeing power
I'm sticking to my original opinion that this was an accident and not a terrorist act.
Unreal that CNN and other media outlets will post all these stupid rumors without any facts.
I still don't how the transponder got turned off but it could be lousy ATC and poor radar coverage.
they could be interviewing some guy who has nothing to do with security and out of nowhere Wolf Blitzer will hit him with the "BUT IT COULD BE TERRORISM RIGHT, THEY COULD HAVE TURNED OFF THE TRANSPONDERS RIGHT".
I mean literally they throw the terrorism word out every 2 minutes. they love this shit
-
03-12-14 05:55 PM #180
Originally Posted by nyplayer33
-
03-12-14 06:05 PM #181
Yes 13000 feet deep more than 2.5 miles but they found the black boxes albeit 2 years later. Commercial jetliners don't go unfounded after crashes, not in the modern era Originally Posted by cloverfield
-
03-12-14 06:19 PM #182
Originally Posted by nyplayer33
-
03-12-14 07:21 PM #183
bingo Originally Posted by 5mike5
-
03-12-14 08:18 PM #184
-
03-12-14 08:37 PM #185
not necessarily. it was announced almost 4 hours ago that these pics exist but apparently they are from 3 days ago so who knows what they'll find when they get there and whether that is debris Originally Posted by ACoochy
-
03-12-14 08:42 PM #186
on one crash it took 2 yrs. to find the black box plus the copilot had a history of letting women in the cockpit-now chinese satellite photo has found something-malaysian authorities are pathetic
-
03-12-14 09:22 PM #187
Testimony from the worker on the oil rig who reported it to his superiors at the time also. Originally Posted by homie1975
Me thinks planes dont fall out of the sky everyday so the chance this isnt the wreckage is pretty slim...
-
03-12-14 09:40 PM #188
Those are some huge chunks of debris that look too large to float but maybe the resolution was tinkered with
-
03-12-14 10:11 PM #189
Seems like they should have seen and/or found this several days ago ...with all the false leads, I'll believe it when they have live video of a piece of plane.
-
03-13-14 12:30 AM #190
Closing in on 9 hours since the chinese satellite photos hit the news and at least 7.5 of those in daylight, but no definitive id that any of those pieces are from the plane. Unless they are a group of debris that looks like one big piece when viewing from space, i have a hard time believing they are from the plane. Interestingly though, one of the shots looks like the space shuttle with its bay open as if it's sitting on the water. Anyhow the search planes have no doubt flown over this area today as they know the coordinates but no info about what they saw. I am leaning to no on the question if: is this the plane debris?
-
03-13-14 01:24 AM #191
This was my theory on page 1 or 2 of the thread.
US investigators are pursuing the possibility that missing Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 and its 239 passengers and crew are being held against their will at an unknown location.
The Wall Street Journal has this afternoon published sensational claims that counterterrorism officials now believe somebody on board deliberately turned off the plane’s transponders to avoid radar detection.
The report said data automatically downloaded and sent to the ground from the Boeing 777’s engines indicated the plane remained in the air for a total of five hours – a further four hours after contact was lost.
“Officials were told investigators are actively pursuing the notion that the plane was diverted ‘with the intention of using it later for another purpose’,” the paper said, quoting an unnamed source.
A total flight time of five hours after departing Kuala Lumpur means the Boeing 777 could have continued for an additional distance of about 2,200 nautical miles, reaching points as far as the Indian Ocean, the border of Pakistan or even the Arabian Sea, based on the jet’s cruising speed, the paper said.
http://www.news.com.au/travel/travel...-1226853195656
-
03-13-14 01:59 AM #192
Optional, You think they're alive?
no way
-
03-13-14 02:19 AM #193
Not really I guess. When i posted that theory initially I was thinking laterally more than being serious. Originally Posted by boeing power
BUT... right now with all the weird conflicting information. It makes as much logical sense as any other theory, and more than most.
The Oil rig worker who says he saw a burning plane in the same region as the Chinese satellite had possible debri seems the most reliable info to me though.
http://www.news.com.au/world/oil-rig...-1226853302184
-
03-13-14 02:22 AM #194
What do you make of the 5 hours of engine data having been transmitted? (assuming that info is true) Originally Posted by boeing power
-
03-13-14 02:26 AM #195
There's been so many false reports about this so far I can't believe anything I read. Originally Posted by Optional
I'm still believing this was a catastrophic accident.
-
03-13-14 02:32 AM #196
Just assume it is true. Can you think of any explanation for it? Originally Posted by boeing power
It kind of ties into the passengers mobile phones and social media accounts staying online for a period too. Hmmm
-
03-13-14 02:40 AM #197
Whatever official explanation comes out of this, we have seen the birth of a new conspiracy theory super star.
After all this misinformation people are going to be easy to convince to wonder in the future.
-
03-13-14 02:41 AM #198
How would terrorists control that many people? Not after 911 Originally Posted by Optional
unless it was the pilot, but how would he get everyone's phone?
Fuk now I'm doing the conspiracy thing....
Last edited by boeing power; 03-13-14 at 02:46 AM.
-
03-13-14 02:48 AM #199
LOL.. didn't mean to make you act that dirty. Originally Posted by boeing power
How would terrorists control that many people? Not after 911
unless it was the pilot, but how would he get everyone's phone?
unless the pilot donned his oxygen mask and dumped the pressurization and killed everyone but himself after the other pilot went to the bathroom. I fly 737 and I know that would be easy to do unfortunately.
Fuk now I'm doing the conspiracy thing....
If it was a takeover of the plane, with pilots involved or not, I imagine the passengers would be killed. If you wanted to keep a plane for later use you probably dont want to feed and care for the 200+ passengers. Even for the 6 days its been.
What I was really looking for is a possible explanation why there might be 5 hours of engine data, and it could still be an accident of some sort.
-
03-13-14 03:06 AM #200
If there was a pressurization failure and the pilots never got their masks on fast enough they would die and the plane would fly on auotpilot until it ran out of gas... Originally Posted by Optional
-
03-13-14 03:49 AM #201
I read a suggestion if the depressurization was slow enough it may not set of alarms and alert pilots to use oxygen and drop masks for passengers. In that article about the possible satellite antennae problem. But that didn't really seem plausible to me. With 200 passengers they wouldn't all just peacefully nod off without complaint in that scenario would they? Originally Posted by boeing power
-
03-13-14 03:51 AM #202
And say it was some sort of deressuriztion that disabled everyone fast... if the plane was still flyable, what would happen then? Would the autopilot take it to beijing?
-
03-13-14 04:07 AM #203
1.Altitude warning horn would go off even in a slow leak. This would be a better scenario for the pilots as they wold have more time to get their oxygen masks on. In a rapid depressurization at 35000 the pilots would have 30-60 seconds to get their masks on before unconscious.
2. In the event that pressurization failed and everyone died, the plane would continue on the flight plan which was programmed by the pilots into the FMC(fight management computer) prior to flight. So yes it would continue to Beijing but it would never descend and just fly past Beijing until it ran out of fuel and crashed. In that case the military would have to shoot it down over the ocean to avoid it crashing in a populated area.
-
03-13-14 05:24 AM #204
Its apparent now nobody knows a damn thing.
Points Awarded:
flyingillini gave 5mike5 1 SBR Point(s) for this post.
-
03-13-14 05:28 AM #205
All this news is to confuse you...it is basically transhumanism..where technology and media control your thoughts.
You will never see the plane again
-
03-13-14 09:56 AM #206
slim wins. That wasn't the plane Originally Posted by ACoochy
-
03-13-14 09:58 AM #207
Just like Payne Stewarts private jet right? Originally Posted by boeing power
-
03-13-14 10:04 AM #208
Lee Majors flew a plane into space back in the early 80's. Originally Posted by nyplayer33
-
03-13-14 10:19 AM #209
Will SBR ever charter a plane for its posters?
-
03-13-14 10:28 AM #210
Just saw Non-Stop yesterday with Liam Neeson. Great movie.....sort of reminded me of this incident.
Reply With Quote
