What I was doing was explaining what I think is SBR's policy, which is to reserve the F rating only for books that stiff everyone.
I don't necessarily agree with this policy. Perhaps F+ should be for books that frequently stiff some players, F should be for books that stiff a lot of players, and F- should be for books that stiff everyone.
I absolutely agree with you that there are a lot of books that do not stiff anyone.
In the case of sportsbook.com and SBG they flat out stoled, period. There is no controversy. They have no case. Sportsbook stoled from EVERYONE who bet (over and fav) or (under and dog) because if they had been lucky enough to have a winning streak, they would have been included amongst the 31.
Curious, I had not money stolen, but I am absolutely on your side. I posted over at eog.com and asked shrink to take down the banner to SBG because my friends had money stolen there. I would ask all other posters here at SBR to do the same. Go to the other sites that continue to advertise SBG and ask them to take down the link to SBG now. By the way, eog's response was for the 18 people effected to email theshrink@eog.com, but if you have already emailed Bill or SBR, I don't know the appropriateness of having two representatives negotiating at the same time. I would email shrink, tell him you already have a negotiator and tell him to pleast take down his SBG link as there is going to be a boycott of not only SBG but sites that advertise them as well.