[losturmarbles]

And FWIW, if you believe anything the IPCC says then you're a fukin moron.

[subs]

i do not watch TV

only sport on my puter and i always read the news on my preferred site. i tube video that i want or download the torrent. the TV in my house is for DVD's only

my dayz of believing the hype is gone...

infowars is illuminating, trying to say something +ve

[dinaro7]

there is no such thing as global warming its climate change nuff said

[losturmarbles]

Link Not Working - Removed-)

[losturmarbles]

Climategate U-turn as scientist at centre of row admits: There has been no global warming since 1995

* Data for vital 'hockey stick graph' has gone missing
* There has been no global warming since 1995
* Warming periods have happened before - but NOT due to man-made changes

[losturmarbles]

The Climate Bogeyman

Now we’re all familiar with witch-hunt logic:
We throw the unpopular woman in the lake:

• If she drowns, she was innocent.
• If she floats and survives, she’s a witch and we burn her at the stake.

This kind of evil trick has been used by people seeking power through fear, for as long as recorded history.
It is one thing that Principles of Justice, and the Scientific Method, are supposed to counteract.
Sadly, this appears to be the same logic that the global warming profiteers use.
If the weather is warm, it’s proof of global warming, if it’s cold, it’s proof the weather has been disrupted by global warming.
The scientific method does not stop them, even though they are “climate scientists”, because they do not use it. They have long-ago abandoned the rules of hard science.
When we had an abnormally large number of hurricanes back around the time of Katrina, this was a result of global warming, and we could only expect things to get worse.
When the next few years were abnormally quiet, including one of the mildest hurricane seasons in history, it meant nothing.
When it’s really hot somewhere locally, they say it’s evidence of global warming.
When it’s really cold, it not only means nothing, “that’s weather, not climate”, but maybe it’s because global warming is disrupting the weather, so it proves global warming.
A few glaciers are shrinking faster than normal…global warming.
Some other glaciers are growing larger than in recorded history: Not worth mentioning.
The north polar ice cap had a significant melt: Warming.
The Antarctic ice sheet grew larger than in recorded history: Silence.

[subs]

ok Mr marbles i did delete tht sh1t - BTW infowars is right about 911

[losturmarbles]

ok Mr marbles i did delete tht sh1t - BTW infowars is right about 911

Well we can agree on that at least.

[Chuck Sims]

This kind of evil trick has been used by people seeking power through fear, for as long as recorded history.

Al Gore's power trip has been shorted out.

[Hotdiggity11]

there is no such thing as global warming its climate change nuff said

Uh what?

[pavyracer]

Just natural cycle. Decided this year to melt twice as much as the last 150 years.

[losturmarbles]

Just natural cycle. Decided this year to melt twice as much as the last 150 years.

in Greenland. And yes, the earth's natural cyclical trends of warming and cooling, by definition, cycle. Thank you Peabody

[EasyHustlin]

[quote=losturmarbles;8488534] in Greenland. And yes, the earth's natural cyclical trends of warming and cooling, by definition, cycle. Thank you Peabody. Don't let the growth in ice above Greenland during the past 2 years get in

[losturmarbles]

More disinformation. You are on a roll buddy!

Oh yeah, what part? Keep trusting the mainstream news machine, they are certainly out to inform and educate you, and not hype the hysteria. This is investigative journalism, not scare tactics: "Greenland will contribute more to rising seas"; "temperatures in the Arctic region have risen at two to three times the global average over the last 40 years"; "This would double the predictions for overall sea-level rise"; "A one-metre (3.25 feet) increase in the global watermark would devastate many island nations, and wreak havoc in heavily-populated delta regions across the planet."

All the while ignoring why the glaciers were there to start with and the growth of glaciers in other places. They blame "climate change". So either they are being redundant (climate is not constant), or they're impling the global warming hypothesis that an increase in man made CO2 is the cause. Of course they don't explicitly say that because it would be easy to refute and totally discredit them. They are aware that that silly notion is still widely held by the indoctrinated masses, so it's easy to subtly imply it. Meanwhile these indoctrinated masses are so invested in the hype, that in the face of independent research or unbiased reporting they call it disinformation.

Nice Call Buddy!