pickwinnersallday, we werent really discussing line shopping as much as nysg was basically saying he didnt care what the line was, he was betting the team that he capped to cover a line, no matter how bad that line was...and then said if he got a good # or beat the closer, that was even better, but completely irrelevant
... this is how the majority of people bet and the flaw in this is seen in the books bottom line every year...their really is no valid arguement
i admit, i have run across a few guys who dont line shop much and dont worry much with statistical edges, closing #s, etc... but are in the black for their lifetime and honestly seem to have a knack at winning in certain sports... it can happen, they study the shit out of teams and simply win more than they lose, its just rare...but nobody is getting rich doing it and the bad streaks are much worse than the good and the odds are heavily stacked against them winning long term, but some still keep on winning a little, year after year... nysg, maybe you will be one of those guys... 3 years isnt much time to show, but if you think you are ahead for your first 3 years, then i wish you the same luck until you quit...
since you need some sort of proof, i believe mathy probably has a small database showing the winning % of players beating closing #s at some large books since they started calculating things of that nature... maybe he will share it in the morning