Originally posted on 02/03/2013:

A ridiculous essay, but I can address a couple of things quickly.

Quote Originally Posted by ttwarrior1 View Post

1. It was here that 600,000 black people, brought from Africa in slave ships, grew into a community of 40 million, were introduced to Christian salvation.


2. Untold trillions have been spent since the 60's on welfare, food stamps, rent supplements, Section 8 housing, Pell grants, student loans, legal services, Medicaid, Earned Income Tax Credits and poverty programs designed to bring the African-American community into the mainstream. Governments, businesses and colleges have engaged in discrimination against white folks -- with affirmative action, contract set-asides and quotas -- to advance black applicants over white applicants. Churches, foundations, civic groups, schools and individuals all over America have donated their time and money to support soup kitchens, adult education, day care, retirement and nursing homes for blacks.


3. As for racism, its ugliest manifestation is in interracial crime, and especially interracial crimes of violence. Is Barack Obama aware that while white criminals choose black victims 3 percent of the time, black criminals choose white victims 45 percent of the time?

Is Barack aware that black-on-white rapes are 100 times more common than the reverse, that black-on-white robberies were 139 times as common in the first three years of this decade as the reverse?


1. So what. Religion is relevant why?


2. Welfare and such isn't a magic remedy to social problems, can tend to increase class divides rather than narrow them.


3. Essentially an argument than blacks commit more crimes on whites than in reverse. But blacks can also be categorised as a socioeconomic class rather than a species or something, so an argument then that people of poor socioeconomic status commit more crimes which impact about 45% of the upper class.

In Australia there's white people of poor socioeconomic status who commit a lot of crimes. A white kid from one of these ghettos stole a car, and died in a high speed pursuit by police. His friends then started rioting and throwing petrol bombs etc against police. The kids have never had a job, live on welfare, have no education and steal cars because they don't want to walk.

So if I see an exclusively white group of people enacting a miniature LA riot on the news, can I then write an essay saying I saw no blacks involved so such disposition to crime is unique to the white species.

Bottom line is nationalism is stupid, people always want to kill people who aren't like them and race is simply an excuse to do so. If it isn't race it's creed, religion, anything else. If a bunch of people were holding hands singing kumbaya, and you walked up and said peace is bad, they'd beat you up.

You could write an article in a discursive manner saying the sky is pink not blue, but that doesn't mean the argument holds any substance. OP is weird.