Originally posted on 02/03/2013:
A ridiculous essay, but I can address a couple of things quickly.
1. So what. Religion is relevant why?
2. Welfare and such isn't a magic remedy to social problems, can tend to increase class divides rather than narrow them.
3. Essentially an argument than blacks commit more crimes on whites than in reverse. But blacks can also be categorised as a socioeconomic class rather than a species or something, so an argument then that people of poor socioeconomic status commit more crimes which impact about 45% of the upper class.
In Australia there's white people of poor socioeconomic status who commit a lot of crimes. A white kid from one of these ghettos stole a car, and died in a high speed pursuit by police. His friends then started rioting and throwing petrol bombs etc against police. The kids have never had a job, live on welfare, have no education and steal cars because they don't want to walk.
So if I see an exclusively white group of people enacting a miniature LA riot on the news, can I then write an essay saying I saw no blacks involved so such disposition to crime is unique to the white species.
Bottom line is nationalism is stupid, people always want to kill people who aren't like them and race is simply an excuse to do so. If it isn't race it's creed, religion, anything else. If a bunch of people were holding hands singing kumbaya, and you walked up and said peace is bad, they'd beat you up.
You could write an article in a discursive manner saying the sky is pink not blue, but that doesn't mean the argument holds any substance. OP is weird.