Originally posted on 01/13/2012:
I respect your opinion, but I disagree with some of the statements below.
By that same token, look at the teams the SF defense have faced this season. Eight of these games were played against teams that rank in the bottom third offensively. They only faced 5 playoff teams (4 of them wildcard teams) and one of those games was against a PIT team hobbled by Big Ben's bad ankle. Two more of these teams (DET & CIN) got their asses handed to them last week despite playing close games with SF. SF was very fortunate to have the schedule they did, which by my rankings was among the 5 easiest played by anyone this year. They didn't play any games against the top 5 offenses in the league. On the other side, New Orleans had 3 games against top 5 offensive teams (Carolina x2, Green Bay).
The Packers did lead for most of the game, but were still defending a potential game tying drive in the final minute after surrendering 34 to the Saints. Jacksonville, on the other hand made barely a whimper in the second half and New Orleans was never in danger of losing that game for a second.
Who's under the impression that the Saints offense is as potent on the road as at home? And more importantly, who's implying that they need to score 41 points in this game to beat the Niners? (They score 41ppg at home and 27ppg on the road). The Niners are going to have to play tough defense in this game, but the greater challenge is going to be for their offense to keep pace with the Saints. I feel like it's very unlikely that the Niners are going to hold the Saints below 21 points AT MINIMUM, no matter how well their defense plays.
And crowd noise is nothing new for a visiting team to contend with. It's a known commodity that has long since been factored into the line. Implying the advantage is an addition to the available point spread is not correct. The Saints will likely have a couple of extra false-starts, but with an elite offensive line that's been together for a while, the Saints should be well equipped to deal with crowd noise. (The saints OL is statistically the best in the NFL)
This is a scheduling issue that the Saints had no control over, and is also not true. Jacksonville's defense is ranked #5 this season and Atlanta's defense is #6. At home, the Saints also beat Chicago (#4 defense), Houston (#8 defense), and Detroit twice (#9 defense). Rankings from Football Outsiders.
The Niners are actually weak against running backs receiving out of the backfield, and the Saints are very adept at working Jimmy Graham and Darren Sproles together high-low while using Colston/Moore/Meachem to pull the safeties and clear out the middle. You're forced to cover the cluster-f\*\*k in the middle and risk leaving the Saints' WRs in one-on-one coverage downfield or Jimmy Graham will pull in the short slant passes for ~10 yards at a very high completion rate. The Niners do not want to be gambling on 1-on-1 coverage downfield a lot in this game as Meachem & Colston will win these matchups.
Brees is VERY well protected by his offensive line (ranked #1 in run blocking, #3 in pass protection) while the SF pass rush sits down at #22. It would be very surprising to see Brees under significant pressure in this game, and should continue to have the time he needs to let routes develop downfield. The strength of SF's rush defense, as you say, is heavily weighted into the linebackers. But the front line does not penetrate well, and as a result they rank 31st in RB tackles for loss. It's part of running a 3-4 system, but significant when we're talking about an opposing QB that is as dangerous as Brees is when given time to operate.