2013: 22-18, +4.5 Units
Week 3: 8-6, +3 Units
Week 2: 7-5, +2 Units
Week 1: 7-7, -.5 Units
I don't expect as much public action, with them all presumably being broke after Week 3 . What a burial. This week I'll try to just go down the card and give some early leans and pick out spots where I think there is value now, or where there will be later in the week. Using BookMaker lines if available for these as they don't include all the bullshit juiced lines that 5dimes uses. Leans are underlined, * means BookMaker didn't have a line but that is the look-ahead from last week.
SF-3-120 @ STL (THURSDAY)
PIT-PK-110 @ MIN*
SEA @ HOU+3-120
NYG @ KC-4-110
BAL @ BUF+3.5
CIN @ CLE+5-110
ARI+3-110 @ TB
CHI+3-110 @ DET*
IND-8-110 @ JAX
NYJ+5 @ TEN
DAL @ SD+2-110
WAS-3.5-110 @ OAK*
PHI+9.5-110 @ DEN*
NE @ ATL+1-110 (SNF)
MIA+5.5-110 @ NO (MNF)
Looks like we're just betting road teams straight down the card. Last week we were pretty balanced in Home/Away, but there is a precedent-setting trend at work here. Home Field Advantage is no longer worth 3 points ... more like 2.5 since 2010. BUT with the nature of scoring in the NFL, a FG is the edge given the host thereby lending us an implicit advantage with road teams. In fact, you would be a winning bettor if you blindly bet every road team in the last 10 years. This year so far it has been worth about 3.15 points, but I expect a regression to the mean. I believe it was Sportscasters (the book) that posited that Instant Replay is the cause for this. Refs subconsciously want to make the home crowd happy, and they have less opportunities to do this, especially in scoring situations and with the advent of the challenge.
The leans that stand out:
PIT: No way this opens PIT-PK. They match up extremely well with MIN and I capped this at PIT-3. Unfortunately, both teams have been losing with MIN losing to the hapless Browns being the more high-profile of the two. PIT's D, while a shell of it's former self, still projects to be solid against downhill RB's and #1 WR's. MIN lacks a true #1, and has a downhill runner in AP, who looks like he's tapered off his HGH regiment and come back down to earth. Ponder against Dick Lebeau = murder. MIN's offense is a sieve and PIT's Offense should be able to produce here. Will be interesting to see if any sharps jump on this off the open. Might need to chase steam if that happens, otherwise we can wait for thespread.com's Public Bet pie charts to update.
BUF: This was a game I knew there would be value on before Week 3, and I capped this at BUF-PK knowing it would be something like BAL-3. Getting to the other side of 3 is all gravy, but a lot of this is predicated on Spiller coming back. BAL's D (heh) doesn't match up well against speed backs or mobile QB's. On the other side, BUF is finally bringing great pressure with their front 4 which should take away the Flacco deep shot to Torrey Smith. BAL already didn't have an intermediate pass game, and Ray Rice will either be a no-go or still off a soft-tissue injury that could slow him down. I think BAL is going to be the public team after stomping HOU and BUF losing to the lowly Jets so mayyybe a Wednesday play if we can get to +4, but don't want to wait too long on this one.
ARI: Pretty straight-forward here. ARI>TB. ARI smartly using Ellington more and more projects as a good matchup against a solid TB run D. The matchup I really like here is ARI D against Freeman as I imagine the kid has to feel like everything is slipping away from him. ARI D should be able to capitalize.
CHI: Like the PIT game, no way this thing opens at CHI+3. If it did, I believe the phrase is "All-In". The line SHOULD be CHI-3.5 but will probably be CHI-2.5.
MIA: Matty Ice went absolutely off against MIA, yet they still came up short. MIA is better than NO, and getting 5.5 points definitely doesn't reflect that. This is funny because I just swore I wouldn't fade NO in the SuperDome again after the beat-down they put on ARI. Well, this was the exception.
Overall, I don't feel as strongly about this card right now as I did last week. Going to have to let the money coming in decide our plays for us on some of these.