1. #36
    khaden
    khaden's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-19-09
    Posts: 1,864
    Betpoints: 1124

    I ended up playing Bama well see what happens

  2. #37
    Romanov
    Diapason Knells
    Romanov's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-08-10
    Posts: 4,137
    Betpoints: 13

    anyone betting out of purdue?

  3. #38
    Romanov
    Diapason Knells
    Romanov's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-08-10
    Posts: 4,137
    Betpoints: 13

    good shit with the half time line at 5dimes: started at 3.5, down to mich st -2.5

  4. #39
    R19
    R19's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-31-11
    Posts: 433
    Betpoints: 853

    Who's looking at Miami Ohio and Toledo?

  5. #40
    Romanov
    Diapason Knells
    Romanov's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-08-10
    Posts: 4,137
    Betpoints: 13

    Quote Originally Posted by R19 View Post
    Who's looking at Miami Ohio and Toledo?
    I like Miami OH but Toledo is meh

  6. #41
    R19
    R19's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-31-11
    Posts: 433
    Betpoints: 853

    Quote Originally Posted by Romanov View Post
    I like Miami OH but Toledo is meh
    Thanks. I wasn't looking at the number of bets on the Toledo game.

  7. #42
    rglopez
    rglopez's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-11-10
    Posts: 1,520
    Betpoints: 86

    Quote Originally Posted by khaden View Post
    I ended up playing Bama well see what happens
    I think Bama was a play also, opened at +10 closed at +10.5 over 3000 bets and over 72% on Kentucky fits all 3 of the criteria.

  8. #43
    Romanov
    Diapason Knells
    Romanov's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-08-10
    Posts: 4,137
    Betpoints: 13

    Quote Originally Posted by rglopez View Post
    I think Bama was a play also, opened at +10 closed at +10.5 over 3000 bets and over 72% on Kentucky fits all 3 of the criteria.
    No. That movement is consistent with the 72% on Kentucky. It would've had to go to 9.5 for it to be a play

  9. #44
    PAULYPOKER
    I slipped Tricky Dick a hit of LSD!
    PAULYPOKER's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-06-08
    Posts: 36,585


  10. #45
    rglopez
    rglopez's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-11-10
    Posts: 1,520
    Betpoints: 86

    One more thing, for the 3000 bets qualifier its the total bets on the game right not on the team? for Example UAB has 2100 bets and CFU has 1900 bets but together they are over 3000 bets or are we only looking for 3000+ bets on 1 team?

  11. #46
    R19
    R19's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-31-11
    Posts: 433
    Betpoints: 853

    Quote Originally Posted by rglopez View Post
    One more thing, for the 3000 bets qualifier its the total bets on the game right not on the team? for Example UAB has 2100 bets and CFU has 1900 bets but together they are over 3000 bets or are we only looking for 3000+ bets on 1 team?
    Total Bets.

  12. #47
    PAULYPOKER
    I slipped Tricky Dick a hit of LSD!
    PAULYPOKER's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-06-08
    Posts: 36,585


  13. #48
    Bettowin23
    Bettowin23's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 06-25-10
    Posts: 1,038
    Betpoints: 1734

    I agree with you in that Alabama +10 should have been a play had one checked just before tip. It was not a play when +10.5 or more earlier in the day. +10 would have been no change from the opening line.

    Same reason Wake Forest was a pick. No line movement in the opening and closing line.

    The timing of checking the lines seems to be very important.

    Quote Originally Posted by rglopez View Post
    I think Bama was a play also, opened at +10 closed at +10.5 over 3000 bets and over 72% on Kentucky fits all 3 of the criteria.

  14. #49
    PAULYPOKER
    I slipped Tricky Dick a hit of LSD!
    PAULYPOKER's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-06-08
    Posts: 36,585

    TOTAL u136-110 (UCLA vrs OREGON)

  15. #50
    chinoloco212
    chinoloco212's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-24-11
    Posts: 1,095
    Betpoints: 91

    imma help you guys out, imma try and guess what dozer would pick here, ive been trying to guess today and have been 2-0 so far and alabama and dayton..so next pick


    Illinois Chicago - Medium

  16. #51
    jcee
    jcee's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-21-12
    Posts: 262
    Betpoints: 566

    how do u know what he's picking?

  17. #52
    ksnooksk
    ksnooksk's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-18-11
    Posts: 2,890
    Betpoints: 34

    Yeah, Dozer's picks arent hard to figure out guys.

  18. #53
    wiseguy007
    wiseguy007's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-20-12
    Posts: 444

    Quote Originally Posted by PAULYPOKER View Post
    TOTAL u136-110 (UCLA vrs OREGON)

    This is not a play

  19. #54
    chinoloco212
    chinoloco212's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-24-11
    Posts: 1,095
    Betpoints: 91

    ill help you guys out more, i used to use his thread to confirm most of my plays

    heres another one im pretty sure hes gon have

    Texas (Medium)

    Texas Tech (LArGE)

  20. #55
    ksnooksk
    ksnooksk's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-18-11
    Posts: 2,890
    Betpoints: 34

    Tennessee Small
    Notre Dame Medium

    etc.....

  21. #56
    tokio
    tokio's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-30-10
    Posts: 2,150
    Betpoints: 2886

    gonna wait and see how this system works out.

  22. #57
    CallmeClutch23
    CallmeClutch23's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-19-12
    Posts: 32
    Betpoints: 251

    so for instance...the Patriots opened at -9 and 62% of the public are taking them (almost 30,000 bets on there side) and the line is now at -7...wouldn't you want to jump all over the Patriots?

  23. #58
    crockje
    crockje's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-03-11
    Posts: 384
    Betpoints: 701

    Quote Originally Posted by chinoloco212 View Post
    imma help you guys out, imma try and guess what dozer would pick here, ive been trying to guess today and have been 2-0 so far and alabama and dayton..so next pick Illinois Chicago - Medium
    Chino curious why the dayton pick? the other follow rlm just curious what was your decision for saying doz would be on dayton

  24. #59
    SilverTongueFox
    SilverTongueFox's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-23-10
    Posts: 2,338
    Betpoints: 5303

    What site are you using to find # of bets? Is it a free site?

  25. #60
    BigDofBA
    BigDofBA's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-30-09
    Posts: 19,311
    Betpoints: 2011

    Quote Originally Posted by CallmeClutch23 View Post
    so for instance...the Patriots opened at -9 and 62% of the public are taking them (almost 30,000 bets on there side) and the line is now at -7...wouldn't you want to jump all over the Patriots?
    No. If everyone is taking the Pats, the line should go up to -10 or -11. It shouldn't drop. That's RLM.

  26. #61
    chinoloco212
    chinoloco212's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-24-11
    Posts: 1,095
    Betpoints: 91

    Quote Originally Posted by crockje View Post
    Chino curious why the dayton pick? the other follow rlm just curious what was your decision for saying doz would be on dayton
    my bad i meant wake

  27. #62
    Blood Drake
    Blood Drake's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-23-11
    Posts: 101
    Betpoints: 632

    The premise of the RML betting system is that sharps/mafia/boosters/etc all know something that the public doesn't know, correct? Then they are placing LARGE bets against the public consensus, which moves the line away from the public's perceived outcome. And the system is to track the lines that are moving (opposite public) but only have a small number of bets. Is that correct?

    When noticing this phenomenon, what is the best way to bet? Money Lines, spreads, parlays with teasers,etc

  28. #63
    chinoloco212
    chinoloco212's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-24-11
    Posts: 1,095
    Betpoints: 91

    Quote Originally Posted by Blood Drake View Post
    The premise of the RML betting system is that sharps/mafia/boosters/etc all know something that the public doesn't know, correct? Then they are placing LARGE bets against the public consensus, which moves the line away from the public's perceived outcome. And the system is to track the lines that are moving (opposite public) but only have a small number of bets. Is that correct?

    When noticing this phenomenon, what is the best way to bet? Money Lines, spreads, parlays with teasers,etc

    always spreads

  29. #64
    balls2wall
    balls2wall's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-20-09
    Posts: 2,642
    Betpoints: 6601

    Quote Originally Posted by SilverTongueFox View Post
    What site are you using to find # of bets? Is it a free site?


    Did you bother to read the first post?


    However, I use a different site

  30. #65
    SlickRick1382
    If hustlin' is a must; be Sosa, not Tony
    SlickRick1382's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-15-11
    Posts: 3,838
    Betpoints: 11517

    Quote Originally Posted by Romanov View Post
    Sounds good. I am already on Purdue +8 because of the Lang Fade. After he posted his play of Mich St -8.5 the line shot down to 7
    Not that I'm advocating tailing or fading Lang. Just thought you should know it was mentioned last week by people I know from Vegas that Lang is no longer making his own plays. He has someone else making them for him so may want to temper your expectations.

    Doesn't mean he'll automatically be better but could also mean he won't be as bad

  31. #66
    Night-Tripper
    Fade Me!
    Night-Tripper's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-14-09
    Posts: 3,205
    Betpoints: 3326

    Thanks for picking up the slack guys... got a moment to say that y'all have been doing a great job of pointing people in the right direction when they mau have been thinking there was a play when it wasn't.

    As far as Wake Forest being a play... could cared less what dozer thought. It was already on my original list of three plays this morning... glad that Wake and Rutgers took care of business. Purdue was a miss, but their travel problems were noted by one of the contributors and I made the decision to not be influnced.

    Anyway, the dude that's a friend of dozers is more than welcome to post whatever he thinks dozer woulda played as well as the amount... even if it's nothing but air.

    I have Tennessee, Texas Tech, Notre Dame and Stanford as plays for me... waiting for more to meet the # bets criteria.

    Anyone besides me made any money today playing with this stuff?

  32. #67
    Night-Tripper
    Fade Me!
    Night-Tripper's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-14-09
    Posts: 3,205
    Betpoints: 3326

    Quote Originally Posted by crockje View Post
    Chino curious why the dayton pick? the other follow rlm just curious what was your decision for saying doz would be on dayton
    Because him and dozer are buds... and because dozer wasn't a strict follower of the system.

  33. #68
    wiseguy007
    wiseguy007's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-20-12
    Posts: 444

    Does anyone know of a site for bets and consensus for 1st and 2nd half plays?

  34. #69
    Night-Tripper
    Fade Me!
    Night-Tripper's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-14-09
    Posts: 3,205
    Betpoints: 3326

    Quote Originally Posted by chinoloco212 View Post
    ill help you guys out more, i used to use his thread to confirm most of my plays

    heres another one im pretty sure hes gon have

    Texas (Medium)

    Texas Tech (LArGE)
    Texas is not a RLM play

    Texas Tech is

  35. #70
    Night-Tripper
    Fade Me!
    Night-Tripper's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-14-09
    Posts: 3,205
    Betpoints: 3326

    Quote Originally Posted by crockje View Post
    Tripper are adding Tenn as a play? line opened at -3 went down -2.5 62% on uconn 3,172 bets
    Called my wife and had her turn in a Volunteer bet for me since I was otherwise preoccupied. Thanks for the tip and thanks for helping out the users who had questions or were unsure if a play qualified.

First 12345 ... Last
Top