[DoggyStyle]

I know you all are probably going to call me a liar and what not but..... I have made over 10k wagering on MMA over the past couple years. And my bets range from 50-200$. I usually start with 100$ bankroll. Anyways my MMA wagering record in the past 6 months is 17-4 and i can say in all seriousness that i hit at a 75% clip or higher regularly in UFC. UFC is my best sport to wager on. If you believe me follow my thread and tail and reap the rewards

[NunyaBidness]

Why do you usually start with a $100 bankroll? I would only start with a $100 bankroll once.

[Crassus]

Why do you usually start with a $100 bankroll? I would only start with a $100 bankroll once.

Gotta stay hungry. Eye of the tiger.

[MD]

Oh man, this is going to be a doozy.

I know you all are probably going to call me a liar and what not but..... I have made over 10k wagering on MMA over the past couple years. And my bets range from 50-200$. I usually start with 100$ bankroll. Anyways my MMA wagering record in the past 6 months is 17-4 and i can say in all seriousness that i hit at a 75% clip or higher regularly in UFC. UFC is my best sport to wager on. If you believe me follow my thread and tail and reap the rewards

1. Bragging about making 10k in two years betting MMA.
2. Only making 21 wagers in six months. Seriously? I can make twice that on one card.
3. Claiming to hit 75% as if win % is a measure of success.
4. Most importantly:

This is a horrible card! That being said im just doing a chalky parlay Aldo/Machida/Magalhaes. Would be a decent card if Kos and Maia fight was still on. The only one that legitimately could be upset out of those 3 is Magalhaes but Aldo and Machida are stone cold s

I was on sergio. Magney is lanky with no ttd. Was easy to know that sergio was going to get him down with no problem and do what he did

Retro-posting scumbag that posts his "only" wager, a big-fave parlay which loses​, and then claims after the event that he won on an "easy" play which everyone should have seen coming.

Get the f-ck out.

[PunisherIND]

per event bankroll ?

[Luca Fury]

I'm sure you'll get a ton of hate in this thread because that's what this forum does, but I wish you the best.

Hope you prove all the haters wrong. Good luck!

[JIBBBY]

Hard to pick MMA fights as I've been trying for years.. You better have access to training camp information, study history and style of each fighter and hope and pray they fight like they can at the ring of the bell..

If you win 75 percent of the time then you are probably breaking even on the big odds given to favorites overall.. Did you call Anderson Silva getting knocked out cold OP? I'd bet you didn't..

Anyways, yes I'm calling you out.. Don't think you are that good unless you are picking heavy favorites to arrive at the 17-4 record.... Just being honest..

[Ron_Paul_2012]

I know you all are probably going to call me a liar and what not but..... I have made over 10k wagering on MMA over the past couple years. And my bets range from 50-200$. I usually start with 100$ bankroll. Anyways my MMA wagering record in the past 6 months is 17-4 and i can say in all seriousness that i hit at a 75% clip or higher regularly in UFC. UFC is my best sport to wager on. If you believe me follow my thread and tail and reap the rewards

That's the only accurate prediction your making this week cornholio.

[brooks85]

Oh man, this is going to be a doozy.



1. Bragging about making 10k in two years betting MMA.
2. Only making 21 wagers in six months. Seriously? I can make twice that on one card.
3. Claiming to hit 75% as if win % is a measure of success.
4. Most importantly:





Retro-posting scumbag that posts his "only" wager, a big-fave parlay which loses​, and then claims after the event that he won on an "easy" play which everyone should have seen coming.

Get the f-ck out.

jealousy is strong in this one

and win% is a direct measure of success, what's yours?

I look forward to reading your excuse why you don't post your W-L record.


It could possibly be funnier than when I was pointing out your flaws in the weidman/silva fight and I asked what you said about Weidmans cardio, you replied...

"I didn't say a word about Weidman's Cardio..."

that was too funny

[MD]

jealousy is strong in this one

and win% is a direct measure of success, what's yours?

I look forward to reading your excuse why you don't post your W-L record.


It could possibly be funnier than when I was pointing out your flaws in the weidman/silva fight and I asked what you said about Weidmans cardio, you replied...

"I didn't say a word about Weidman's Cardio..."

that was too funny

The stupid is strong in this one.

[PunisherIND]

win% is a direct measure of success, what's yours?

perhaps if he were only betting on -115 lines. but we're talking about mma moneylines here.

win% tells you very little in and of itself.

[mmaed]

The easiest thing to go by to determine success is percentage return on bankroll.

[brooks85]

perhaps if he were only betting on -115 lines. but we're talking about mma moneylines here.

win% tells you very little in and of itself.

It doesn't matter what lines you are talking about, win% is win%. Are you going to tail the guy with the 55% win% or the guy with 68%?

If you are a value bettor, as most people seem to be, or if you focus on winning, your win% will speak directly to your success.

If you're a value bettor, most likely your win% is going to be near 55% and thus your plays are a coin flip basically each event but over the long run you're good. Personally, I can't stand betting like this but it's profitable and to each his own. Thus, if you knew a value bettor and his win% was in the 60s, that would speak volumes.

So yes, win% is a direct correlation to your success.



ROI is definitely excellent but good luck getting that lol

[Crassus]

EDIT: never mind I don't feel like it.

[MD]

It doesn't matter what lines you are talking about, win% is win%. Are you going to tail the guy with the 55% win% or the guy with 68%?

If you are a value bettor, as most people seem to be, or if you focus on winning, your win% will speak directly to your success.

If you're a value bettor, most likely your win% is going to be near 55% and thus your plays are a coin flip basically each event but over the long run you're good. Personally, I can't stand betting like this but it's profitable and to each his own. Thus, if you knew a value bettor and his win% was in the 60s, that would speak volumes.

So yes, win% is a direct correlation to your success.



ROI is definitely excellent but good luck getting that lol

I set out the highlight the retarded parts, and I ended up highlighting your entire post.

You are as dumb as a sack of shit and you know literally almost nothing about gambling.

[brooks85]

wait so ROI is not excellent?

interesting.

[MD]

wait so ROI is not excellent?

interesting.

You are my dream poster. Everything you post is gold.

[brooks85]

lol keep trying.

First win% is meaningless and now, ROI% is what? Is it even useful according to you?

[MD]

lol keep trying.

First win% is meaningless and now, ROI% is what? Is it even useful according to you?

We should all start measuring our success by how many hail Mary parlays we almost hit, that have two opposing fighters in them.

Then we can be good gamblers like you.

[brooks85]

Everyone already knows they can't hit jackpot parlays like me.

So back to ROI, useful or useless?

[MD]

Everyone already knows they can't hit jackpot parlays like me.

So back to ROI, useful or useless?

Useful for sit-and-gos, not so much for sports betting.

[Educ8d Degener8]

My win % is 90 percent.

I only bet -1000 favorites and higher.

[THE_LOCKSMITH]

Lol, the feuds are heating up big time. You guys should do a capping contest, 3 events in 7 days on August 28, 31, Sept 04

[Beelzebubzy]

My win % is 90 percent.

I only bet -1000 favorites and higher.

Damn suhn. I only hit 67% at -1000 but they are mostly fliers or long shot parlays so they don't really count

[DoggyStyle]

Lol let the hate flow! To be honest i lost on Anderson Silva but still hitting at a great % and my record is according to wagers hit not actual fights correct. Such as if i hit a 3 or 4 team parlay i am considering that 1 pick right etc. so take it as you will i look forward to showing my "skills" On the August 17th card coming up!

[Noleafclover]

Damnit, I've made about 11% ROI based on bankroll over the last three events, but my win % is penetrating 42%. Brooks, what can I do? Should I consider suicide?

[Noleafclover]

Doggystyle, if you want your win % to be taken seriously, at least post the average juice or an approximation, because otherwise what you're saying is unintelligible. Alternatively, post your returns. (Brooks don't read that, its all lies, please help me with my horrible win percentage)

I'd also really like to hear more about how you usually start with a $100 bkroll What does that mean?

[brooks85]

Damnit, I've made about 11% ROI based on bankroll over the last three events, but my win % is penetrating 42%. Brooks, what can I do? Should I consider suicide?

woah easy now, that is a lot of plays... lol

[brooks85]

Useful for sit-and-gos, not so much for sports betting.

and he adds another statement that further seals his fate as uneducated.

So it's safe to say you have no idea what your W/L record is or ROI?

See for people who know what they are talking about, that would be embarrassing. For you, I'm sure you'll find some kind of pride in it.

[brooks85]

My win % is 90 percent.

I only bet -1000 favorites and higher.

So you only make like 10 mma plays a year?

[MD]

and he adds another statement that further seals his fate as uneducated.

So it's safe to say you have no idea what your W/L record is or ROI?

See for people who know what they are talking about, that would be embarrassing. For you, I'm sure you'll find some kind of pride in it.

You have literally no idea how gambling works, or what is a good measure of success, do you?

[Educ8d Degener8]

So you only make like 10 mma plays a year?

I bet the props too...

"Fight not draw", "Not Guillard by submission"... Shit like that.

[Noleafclover]

woah easy now, that is a lot of plays... lol

Way to ignore the point SMH. Assume I'd said 30 years, and a much higher ROI, same win %. Do you see what is being illustrated, dumbass?

[MD]

Way to ignore the point SMH. Assume I'd said 30 years, and a much higher ROI, same win %. Do you see what is being illustrated, dumbass?

He's been waiting seven hours for me to reply to a post he made in another thread, which I already replied to but he didn't see.

Of course he doesn't see what you're saying.

[JIBBBY]

I would rather just bet on every big underdog on the PPV's cards and see how it plays out sometimes.. Only when the odds are really one sided.. Sometimes it pays off in the end..

I think MMA betting is the hardest sports betting there is... Especially in the heavier weight divisions where one good punch can change the fight and the odds in a blink of an eye..

The lower weight divisions or strong wrestlers I usually like to play.. Still It's hard as hell to bet on fights when it's 3-1 or higher odds. The odds get crazy in some of these fights and I'll out....

Just sharing.