Originally Posted by
EaglesPhan36
This is very backwards thinking IMO. Dolgopolov knocked off Soderling and is a player who is going to be in the Top 20 at some point if he keeps himself away from the gambling syndicates. If you follow tennis, this kid has been an up and comer since last year - only the media stooges like ESPN just became aware of this kid now. Ferrer has been playing perhaps the best tennis of his life on hard courts to start the year and his defensive style is as tough a match-up as you'll find in tennis. Just because they are not the "name" players people expected to see does not mean they weren't tough outs and that Djokovic wouldn't have had problems with players of that caliber. Berdych has always been an easy match-up for Djokovic and he's still no where near his form early last year and into the summer. So that to me was an easier road than Murray had in the last two. The win against Federer was obviously impressive. In my opinion, Murray beat equally tough opponents in the last two rounds if not tougher based on the form they were both in.
At the end of the day, outside of people's perceived notion that beating Federer is the end-all-be-all mark, there is not much to separate the two. They are both very good on this surface. They are both solid returners. I'd give a slight edge to Murray on serve and still think that if this match wears on into a 4th or 5th set it will favor someone like Murray who has already dealt with the pressure and conditions vs. Djokovic who has not had much adversity at all to deal with.