here's one to think about, from a perspective of why's this guy @2.50/+150...ranking's similar but owns the h2h
http://www.tennisexplorer.com/match-detail/?id=1205103
ballpark same ranking (353 vs. 321)
but Kondo's 3-0 in games/6-1 sets over Huang in their three 2013 matches (hard=same as tonight's match)...
what do the books (&./or you guyz) know that's not apparent at all by looking at Tennis-Explorer level stuff...
seems like there's gotta be an injury or a personal matter or something to pin a price-tag on the obviously faster horse like it's "hobbled"...
OR...
do the books just want us to THINK they know something, to make the Kondo tickets--the ones they fear they'll have to pay out on "smell bad".
In all walks of life, "too much of a bargain" always breeds suspicion and is bad for sales...Make Kondo appear weak...at the same time that they charge a premium for tickets on this Huang that the books really expect to lose...by over-pricing Huang (that Kondo's absolutely owned on recent, same surface action) thus making him look much stronger than he really is, in this matchup
the "current pricing vs on-paper breakdown" of this matchup seems to suggest something active, opinionated and strategic...rather than the textbook explanation of the books merely adjusting price passively in an attempt to balance their liability on both sides
i honestly can't figure this sort of thing out...i see it all the time at challenger level...
and this is just a good "hot off the press" (and playable--match at 2200) example of it