>> 28.2 Should a player fail to compete in an individual match or an event, all wagers involving that player
will be void. In the event of a match starting but not being completed, the player progressing to the next round will be deemed the winner; unless, less than one set has been completed in which case all wagers relating to that match will be void.
According to this, tennis betting rules @Betdaq is so-called 1 Set. My bet is Lay 3-0 (set betting) on Martin Klizan v Michael Russell. Russel withdrawed in 4th set. So my Lay bet stands because one set has been completed. And 3-0 is not correct set betting because the match progressed to 4th set.
But Betdaq voided the bet. Is this not against their rules ?
Do you think a following rule applies to this case ? >> 28.3 If the required number of games/ sets to win a match changes in any way then all wagers will be void, except for those on markets which have already been determined.