Some of you guys continue to pick and choose information. I don't think you understand the nature of Iceland's ban.
If they were short of Pfizer doses, they would still use Moderna.
Further, they are vaccinating 12-17 year olds with pfizer.
Yet you hear "Moderna was banned" because of an issue that, according (accurately) to that article, is mild and often goes away on it's own.
Common man, it's like you choose to leave out half the story.
I'm not taking a side here in this debate, but literally two links I addressed today, both being misinterpreted and used for some kind of agenda.
It kind of ruins your agenda when these health agencies are pushing to "vaccinate" the population in the very articles trying to be used, poorly, as anti jab resources, especially when you are misunderstanding the action taken.
Don't you think?