as this board is severely lacking in controversy and vigorous debate, I figured I'd toss this somewhat oldy, but goody, into the fray for discussion.....
who's right?
who's wrong?
war?
murder?
one's got a rpg, one's got a camera.... shoot only the armed guy, or his camera man, too????
and most importantly, did the soldier really suffer from "sand in his vagina," as claimed by his superiors?
bottom like, it's sadly pathetic that any of this ever took place..... but it shows how difficult things can be in the "fog of war".......... May God (or whatever other little invisible man in the sky, or invisible force you worship) take care of the souls of the innocent who are taken in such conflict, and similarly help those who have to continue living after having been subjected to such........ It is sad that humans feel the need to do such things to one another.....
for those interested, here's the uncut (somewhat) version of the tapes of that "engagement":
I have my thoughts on all of this, but will save them at this time, so as not to "taint" (damn i love that word, as it applies to the female body, anyway) the discussion at this point........