1. #1
    bigboydan
    bigboydan's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-10-05
    Posts: 55,425

    Legal U.S. Online Poker In 18 Months?

    All this one is wishful thinking on D'Amato's part.

    Legal U.S. Online Poker In 18 Months?

    PPA chairman optimistic about legalisation

    Speaking at the Global Gaming Expo in Las Vegas today (Thursday) former Senator Alfonse
    D'Amato, chairman of the Poker Players' Alliance pressure group, said he expects the
    legalisation of online poker in the United States within 18 months.

    Other panelists in today's State of the Industry: Internet Gambling at the Crossroads
    keynote session at G2E said pending sanctions by the World Trade Organisation due to
    current U.S. policy on Internet gambling could be the major driver for legalisation.
    This is because non-gaming corporations likely to be affected by the sanctions could put
    pressure on Congress to make a change in its current anti-online gambling approach.

    The panelists in the State of the Industry session included D'Amato; J. Terrence Lanni,
    chairman and CEO of MGM MIRAGE; Gary Loveman, chairman, CEO and president of Harrah's
    Entertainment, Inc.; and Andre Wilsenach, CEO of the Alderney Gambling Control
    Commission.

    The panelists agreed that online poker would likely be legalised before other online
    casino-style games.

    There was consensus among the panelists that it is possible to successfully regulate
    Internet gambling to prevent underage gambling and ensure player protection, but these
    types of protections don't currently exist across the board. With the U.S. ban on
    Internet gambling financial transactions keeping well-known, reputable companies out of
    the marketplace, the panelists expressed concern about player protection in an
    environment dominated by unregulated or poorly regulated sites.

    "I am afraid the U.S. customer today is very exposed - there's no player protection,"
    Andre Wilsenach said.

    In fact, Wilsenach highlighted a distinct difference in the mindset of U.S. regulators
    and U.K. regulators when it comes to regulating Internet gambling. In the United States,
    he said, the concern is how an Internet gambling site will exclude players, but in the
    United Kingdom and other jurisdictions, the concern is how each site will handle player
    protection.

    To provide an example of how an Internet gambling site can be responsibly run, Terry
    Lanni described MGM MIRAGE's experience some years ago with running a site on the Isle
    of Man that did not accept wagers from the United States. According to Lanni, the
    technology put in place for the site allowed the company to ascertain where a player
    lived, verify the player's age and also provide a problem gambling component.

    While the technology was viable, competing with unregulated companies that did not put
    the same stringent screening processes in place made the project economically
    unfeasible, Lanni said. He emphasised, however, that the company now has experience with
    the technology required to keep underage gamblers from playing and is ready to "unpack"
    it once online gambling is legalised and regulated in the United States.

    Lanni underlined the value of having established, trusted brands in the marketplace,
    saying that the major brands give people the comfort they want and the assurance that
    customers will receive their winnings. He cited a survey showing that around 70 percent
    of online gamblers aren't confident in the integrity of the online sites they frequent
    as evidence of the importance of having well-known brands in the mix.

    According to Gary Loveman, Harrah's already is exploring the possibility of expanding
    its World Series of Poker brand by creating Internet gambling sites in countries where
    it is legal to do so. Both Lanni and Loveman emphasized that they have no desire to
    explore jurisdictions where the laws may be unclear - any work they do in the Internet
    gambling sector will only be done in places where the activity is clearly permissible by
    law.

    When asked whether Internet gambling should be regulated at the state or federal level
    if legalised, Lanni and Loveman both supported state-level regulation. Lanni explained
    that the states currently are responsible for gaming regulation, and they do it very
    effectively. He pointed out that the federal entities that would be charged with
    regulating Internet gambling under legislation currently being considered in Congress
    aren't able to fulfill all of their current duties, and that adding this responsibility
    to their other burdens makes no sense.

    In a question-and-answer session with attendees, the panelists were asked about the
    issues posed by gambling and gambling-like activities in online social applications such
    as Second Life. Loveman pointed out that several online applications provide users the
    opportunity to win a virtual asset of some kind and then turn around and sell it for
    real money on online auction sites. He explained that these types of transactions that
    commercialise intangible objects and a variety of other legal online financial
    transactions start to resemble online gambling in a way that makes the current ban on
    online gambling appear hypocritical.

    G2E is a major trade event for the international gaming entertainment community,
    attended by more than 28 000 industry professionals from around the world. It is
    organised by the American Gaming Association (AGA) and Reed Exhibitions.

  2. #2
    rugbybdyb
    rugbybdyb's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-06-07
    Posts: 997

    that would be cool, except Im not a big fan of the poker online except to pass the time......

  3. #3
    Travis
    Travis's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-07-07
    Posts: 105

    More oversight of internet poker could only improve it.

  4. #4
    Always_Over
    Always_Over's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-22-07
    Posts: 167

    Again why ship our money elsewhere
    Because politicians want the vote of some conservatives in rocking chairs want to dictate what the world should do.

    so I am all for it

  5. #5
    jon13009
    jon13009's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-22-07
    Posts: 1,258

    Problem is that the PPA will throw any chances of legalized sports betting under the bus with the sports league "opt-out" clauses and States will also have options to "opt-out" of legalized on-line gambling proposals like the Frank proposal.

    Vegas would love legalized on-line gambling and would do a decent job over what is currently out there. If they had the balls or the funds to battle the sports leagues over the issue in congress, millions of taxable dollars would remain in the US and attract millions of more overseas dollars to the USA.

    Only the Sports Leagues and the hypocritical moralists are stopping this from happening

  6. #6
    tblues2005
    tblues2005's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-30-06
    Posts: 9,234
    Betpoints: 7184

    I wouldn't be surprised if they made this legal and then Nevada gets involved with online poker. I think your right Nevada will do a good job and it will help their economy with more tax revenue for the state.

  7. #7
    Jrad86
    Jrad86's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-22-07
    Posts: 11

    18 months is along time, im not having very good luck on the American Friendly sites, such as Bodog and Pokerstars. The best luck i'm having is at Carbonpoker but they dont have very big guarnteed tournies. Please keep me updated, so that I know when the Non American sites become usable again.

Top