[jjgold]

Picked it off a pro player feed



"Reality Dose...When it comes to tracking picks and trying to get advice from all the countless talking heads out there...Remember one thing:If you’re not beating the closing line by enough to overcome the bookmakers vig, you’re not gonna win long term. Your bets suck."

Spank

[Tanko]

KVB been saying this for years.
Its good that you finally caught up JJ.

[jjgold]

Yes tanker

I started smoking pot

[KVB]

Yes tanker

I started smoking pot

[jjgold]

Only a rare few places have software to track your plays as far as closers

only other option pph software if you want it automated

[KVB]

Picked it off a pro player feed



"Reality Dose...When it comes to tracking picks and trying to get advice from all the countless talking heads out there...Remember one thing:If you’re not beating the closing line by enough to overcome the bookmakers vig, you’re not gonna win long term. Your bets suck."

Spank

See message to you in the first 15 seconds of this video, then watch the last 1:30, Gold.

...

[RangeFinder]

Great vid and explanation K. You should do a book deal, lol.

[johnnyvegas13]

Picked it off a pro player feed



"Reality Dose...When it comes to tracking picks and trying to get advice from all the countless talking heads out there...Remember one thing:If you’re not beating the closing line by enough to overcome the bookmakers vig, you’re not gonna win long term. Your bets suck."

Spank

This only applies to daily betting

[jjgold]

Is beating the closer random?

Seems like it is

[KVB]

Track your bets and why you made them, Gold.

Random can be relative to perception, even mathematically.

[OldBill]

screw it follow my new system teams that go from negative ATS like - 10 to even only plus 5 ATS are failing at average 76% one team is 94% THE AFC total amount won after 10 years is a whopping $24,500.00 now doing NFC CONF so far im up to NFC North

BUT mistake i did in afc was not using the same negative fail again because they are still negative so it's worse fails for all those teams

LIKE this say JETS went negative then plus then negative 15 ats i should start at negative 15 pts again and go to next two games

sometimes teams only negative like 2 points ats but exploded to win 45-20 as a 3 point dog so the win was 48-20 thats plus 28 pts ats

some teams stayed positive but saw decline in ATS like jets +28 +15 then plus 9 4th game Kaboom even after bye weeks because they are sliding down to 0 line and if facing a team headed up thats 95% wins called two teams haeded in oppostion directions BUT if JETS stay plus like say go up to +11 ats next game no matter where or who they play they will fail 100% ats

[texhooper]

Need to put that shit through google translate

[terpkeg]

screw it follow my new system teams that go from negative ATS like - 10 to even only plus 5 ATS are failing at average 76% one team is 94% THE AFC total amount won after 10 years is a whopping $24,500.00 now doing NFC CONF so far im up to NFC North

Are you talkin within a single season or yr to yr ATS performance? What result are you testing, W/L after the significant pull back? This is not clear

[solring]

Only a rare few places have software to track your plays as far as closers

Betstamp is one...