 SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks |
Best Sportsbooks List
|
|
| |||||
| #1 FanDuel | SBR rating 4.8/5 | Review | #6 BetRivers | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review | #2 Caesars | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #7 Fanatics | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review |
| #3 DraftKings | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #8 Betway | SBR rating 3.8/5 | Review | ||
| #4 BetMGM | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #9 Borgata | SBR rating 3.5/5 | Review | ||
| #5 bet365 | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #10 ClutchBet | SBR rating 2.9/5 | Review | ||
Rodgers to Titans?
apparently he's building a home in a Nashville suburb
Tannehill was LaFleur's QB when LaFleur was OC of the Titans, so there's some familiarity there
Titans would also have to send two 1st rounders
is this a more realistic landing spot than Denver or Pittsburgh, or do none stand a chance?
I mean if he wants to win now and I’m sure he does, the Titans would make more sense than Denver or Pittsburgh.
It depends on what kind of moves those other teams would be willing to make to get whatever Rodgers wants a la the Buccs with Brady. But you could argue the Buccs had enough requisite talent there already but just needed the edges rounded off so to speak. I don’t really think the Broncos or Steelers are in a spot where they’re just a good qb away. Titans are pretty loaded right now
|
This post was nominated 1
time
. To view the nominated thread please click here.
People who nominated: Orbison
|
Good one, Orby. I have to admit that's not bad.
Would GBay salary cap shake out OK?
Any fire on Rodgers to San Fran? Surely the young QB can still sit for two years. Garoppolo plus picks would seem like a fair deal.
At SF, Rodgers could stay in the NFC. And stay away from some of the young AFC qbs.
Hea building home there cause hes not vaccinated
He's going to stay in green bay is my guess. I say this every year though.
He's definitely a 10X better QB than Tannehill... major upgrade.
Originally Posted by TheMoneyShot
Would be nice to just be able to hand the ball to Henry and always have a defense keep you in any game.
I doubt it
He is for the next 1-2 seasons. Beyond that, who knows at 40+.
I'm not sure about that. All 3 of those teams(as well as a few others) would be really good with Rodgers at the helm. I'd argue that Denver and Pitt would be a great landing spot for any good QB. They both have good defense and some nice young skill players.
He has multiple homes, it means nothing. If Rodgers left Green Bay it would be for the perfect team and a contender, not the Titans.
Pittsburgh has no offensive line and Denver plays in the toughest division in football. Neither team would be remotely appealing to Rodgers.
The age difference between the 2 is roughly 5 years. I'd take Rodgers statistically and also awareness wise over Tannehill for their remaining playing careers. There's no comparison.
Tannehill straight up lost the game for Tennessee. He was trash with Miami... he's trash with Tennessee.
I'd take Rodgers in a wheelchair over Tannehill.
Tannenhill has had a winning record every year he's been healthy the last several years. But your choice is a false one.
The choice isn't Rodgers or Tannenhill, its Rodgers for 1 year or Tannenhill for 4-5 years.
The Titans weren't sharp because they had a week off, that's on the coaches more than the players.
Well if it’s not Rodgers or some other qb > tannehill? Then the Titans need to draft a qb at 26, or move up to get one
They are not winning a superbowl with tannehill
The Titans were a contender (#1 seed) without Rodgers, why couldn't they contend with him?
The Titans were not a contender without Rodgers, they took advantage of playing in the worst division by far in football.
Yes they were and yes they did.
If Rodgers is planning on playing for Ten it isn't helpful to build a house there before getting the job.
I still think the Broncos. if he plays at all
Nobody with a tv thinks the Titans were contenders. Tannenhill is not a super bowl quarterback.
Makes no sense
they r not a contender even w him
Makes sense if the Hackett/Rodgers stuff is true. Denver has a solid defense, and a super-star-to-be at running back
they need a qb. With Rodgers? They win 11 games minimum. He makes all
their young receivers and tight ends better as well
The betting odds said otherwise. Of course they had a chance.
The betting odds don't play football, they lost by almost 20 to Kansas City the previous time those teams played. They were not contenders.
Again, no Tannenhill is a serviceable quarterback, but he will never win a super bowl.
Ridiculous comment. Serviceable qb’s have won Super Bowls many times. To say never is completely insane. Nick Foles won a SB a few years back and he is terrible.
I think he's estranged from many of his family members, but doesn't his parents live in Tenn? I think his brother lives in that area as well, but they are not on good terms.
I can't see his actress girlfriend wanting to be in Nashville if he had a choice.
This is a different time and the Titans didn't have the talent the Eagles did on offense.
I don't think his parents live in Tennessee, he doesn't talk to them I don't think either.
The titans have Brown and Henry. The eagles had Ertz and Very average players. Rodgers makes about 18 teams instant contenders. Tenn is one for sure.
The NFL has turned into a 100% QB league now, but there will always be a mediocre QB mixed into some Super Bowls. Eli Manning? Dilfer? Flacco? Foles already mentioned. Whatever
Parents have always lived in Cali. Apparently there is some communication now - Arod breaking the ice...
The Eagles had an elite offensive line alshon Jeffery and others. You are clueless as always.
Reply With Quote
