1. 10-01-20 08:15 AM #1
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,723
    Betpoints: 32441

    Today's MLB

    I really like the favorites today but I am not loving the juice I have to lay.
    I may place a two team money line parlay later, just not sure which teams.
    More later.

    Thoughts guys?
    This is as much your thread as it is mine.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 10-01-20 08:16 AM #2
    dark star
    dark star's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-04-09
    Posts: 3,899
    Betpoints: 5551

    Florida TT over?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 10-01-20 08:18 AM #3
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,723
    Betpoints: 32441

    Quote Originally Posted by dark star View Post
    Florida TT over?
    Don't like it, Darvish too tough, Marlin lineup not that experienced for this spot.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 10-01-20 09:11 AM #4
    mackave
    mackave's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-22-14
    Posts: 4,929
    Betpoints: 8453

    tough, still looking, waiting on oakland line
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 10-01-20 09:22 AM #5
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,723
    Betpoints: 32441

    Quote Originally Posted by mackave View Post
    tough, still looking, waiting on oakland line
    I'm waiting on the total of the Cub game to be posted.
    Books are afraid to hang a total on that game too early.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 10-01-20 09:30 AM #6
    mackave
    mackave's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-22-14
    Posts: 4,929
    Betpoints: 8453

    braves -1.5 early looks great, just can’t see cinnci blasting more than 3-4 runs whole game
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 10-01-20 09:44 AM #7
    PublicLogic
    PublicLogic's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-05-20
    Posts: 116
    Betpoints: 652

    Went chalk and played braves & cubs

    Reds could definitely win
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 10-01-20 10:00 AM #8
    Allure
    Allure's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-18-10
    Posts: 7,589
    Betpoints: 15121

    Taking Cubs RL

    Liked the Padres yesterday but they chocked. How can you lay -160 again today....
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 10-01-20 11:01 AM #9
    mackave
    mackave's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-22-14
    Posts: 4,929
    Betpoints: 8453

    I fired at Braves -1.5 f5 , greedy as fuk but think their bats come out banging
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 10-01-20 11:07 AM #10
    jrgum3
    Update your status
    jrgum3's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 07-21-17
    Posts: 7,005
    Betpoints: 16024

    Took a shot on Cincinnati ML and Cincinnati/Atlanta F5 Under 4. I think Castillo pitches well today and the Reds find a way to score somehow against Ian Anderson. It's going to be a close, low scoring game either way so I took that F5 under.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 10-01-20 11:08 AM #11
    stackz125
    stackz125's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 01-03-16
    Posts: 6,097
    Betpoints: 424

    I like the reds and cardinals
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 10-01-20 11:11 AM #12
    lakerboy
    lakerboy's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 04-02-09
    Posts: 94,077
    Betpoints: 7738

    On reds ml small.

    No chance i put money on yu darvish

    Padres not sure

    Kershaw-227? Really
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 10-01-20 11:28 AM #13
    PublicLogic
    PublicLogic's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-05-20
    Posts: 116
    Betpoints: 652

    Yu Darvish is a top 5 pitcher in the league
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 10-01-20 01:02 PM #14
    stackz125
    stackz125's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 01-03-16
    Posts: 6,097
    Betpoints: 424

    Reds may get shut down again. Pathetic.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. 10-01-20 04:27 PM #15
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,723
    Betpoints: 32441

    Quote Originally Posted by stackz125 View Post
    Reds may get shut down again. Pathetic.
    They did, this is what happens to power laden teams that rely on the homer but K too much.
    They fail.
    Want more proof, the Nasty Boys and the Reds against Canseco and Big Mac, Oakland was a 2:1 favorite.
    How'd that work out for the A's? The 2:1 faves got swept in 4 games.

    Who's the MVP?
    Jose Rijo backed by the Nasty Boys, not Big Mac or Canseco.
    Pitching wins fellas, albeit it starters or relievers, pitching wins.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  16. 10-01-20 04:34 PM #16
    Mr KLC
    Mr KLC's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 12-19-07
    Posts: 30,641
    Betpoints: 530

    Quote Originally Posted by stevenash View Post
    They did, this is what happens to power laden teams that rely on the homer but K too much.
    They fail.
    Want more proof, the Nasty Boys and the Reds against Canseco and Big Mac, Oakland was a 2:1 favorite.
    How'd that work out for the A's? The 2:1 faves got swept in 4 games.

    Who's the MVP?
    Jose Rijo backed by the Nasty Boys, not Big Mac or Canseco.
    Pitching wins fellas, albeit it starters or relievers, pitching wins.
    That's what I liked about teams like the mid 60's- early 80's Orioles. Earl Weaver loved the 3 run homer. Of course, to do that you had to have players get on base. Seemed they always had a better than average pitching staff during that time period also. It's a shame that they didn't get over the hump and win more than the 3 World Series that they did.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  17. 10-01-20 05:53 PM #17
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,723
    Betpoints: 32441

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr KLC View Post
    That's what I liked about teams like the mid 60's- early 80's Orioles. Earl Weaver loved the 3 run homer. Of course, to do that you had to have players get on base. Seemed they always had a better than average pitching staff during that time period also. It's a shame that they didn't get over the hump and win more than the 3 World Series that they did.
    I hate to go all the way back to 1969 to make a point but I'll make an exception.
    Mets beat the Orioles in the 1969 World Series 4 games to 1.
    Baltimore was favored 2:1 (I believe it was Baltimore -240)
    That was the year of the "Amazing Mets"

    Mets hit .220 for the series.
    Baltimore was stacked with Hall of Fame Frank Robinson and the rest.
    How did the Mets win?

    Some guys named Seaver and Koosman.
    Even Nolan Ryan got a save.

    I don't care if you have Frank Robinson, Mike Trout, The Mick, and Ty Cobb in the same lineup you're not beating this.



    Playoff Series Stats Regular Season Stats
    Name G GS ERA W L SV CG IP H R ER BB SO WHIP G GS ERA W L SV IP H BB SO WHIP
    Jerry Koosman* 2 2 2.04 2 0 0 1 17.2 7 4 4 4 9 0.623 32 32 2.28 17 9 0 241 187 68 180 1.058
    Tom Seaver 2 2 3 1 1 0 1 15 12 5 5 3 9 1 36 35 2.21 25 7 0 273.1 202 82 208 1.039
    Gary Gentry 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 6.2 3 0 0 5 4 1.2 35 35 3.43 13 12 0 233.2 192 81 154 1.168
    Nolan Ryan 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2.1 1 0 0 2 3 1.286 25 10 3.53 6 3 1 89.1 60 53 92 1.265
    Ron Taylor 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 2.1 0 0 0 1 3 0.429 59 0 2.72 9 4 13 76 61 24 42 1.118


    Pitching wins fellas.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Top
« Previous Thread | Players Talk | Next Thread »