the ints was the difference here. dude gave the game awayOriginally Posted by JayDr3am
 SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks |
Best Sportsbooks List
|
|
| |||||
| #1 FanDuel | SBR rating 4.8/5 | Review | #6 BetRivers | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review | #2 Caesars | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #7 Fanatics | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review |
| #3 DraftKings | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #8 Betway | SBR rating 3.8/5 | Review | ||
| #4 BetMGM | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #9 Borgata | SBR rating 3.5/5 | Review | ||
| #5 bet365 | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #10 ClutchBet | SBR rating 2.9/5 | Review | ||
-
10-04-19 10:35 PM #36
-
10-04-19 10:35 PM #37
At some point they have to learn you don't let the officials who made the call review their own call, they don't want to overturn themselves.
-
10-04-19 10:35 PM #38
win by 3 by miracle, fake pass interference call... TD pass play next play due to bearcats playing PREVENT D... Originally Posted by Mac4Lyfe
glad UC just went for it and QB sneaked it to end it
-
10-04-19 10:36 PM #39
Wrong shocka, Cincinnati outcoached central florida, second half adjustments were the difference. Freshmen QB got exposed. Originally Posted by shocka1212
-
10-04-19 10:44 PM #40
actually you're wrong....UCF outgained, had more first downs and should have won the game QB threw a pick 6 and then another int deep in the red zone which would have made it a 3 point game with 12 minutes left in the game. turnover margin was the difference. its pretty clear to see. not sure what you're trying to say here Originally Posted by thomorino
-
10-04-19 10:46 PM #41
You must have been on crack, Cincinnati dominated the second half, the interception for the TD was the adjustment they made jumping short routes. This game was a great example of why coaching matters Originally Posted by shocka1212
-
10-04-19 10:46 PM #42
Thank God they won. I would have lost my ass if Cinci would have blown that. Originally Posted by ThaTopMoron
-
10-04-19 10:47 PM #43
feel like you left a few points out there boys
-
10-04-19 10:47 PM #44
coaching has nothing to do with a player jumping a route.... what you're saying makes no sense. UCF QB made poor decisions down the stretch. thats all that happened here Originally Posted by thomorino
-
10-04-19 10:48 PM #45
the difference were the pick6 and the int on the redzone (from the tipped ball). But uc secondary played tough, ucf qb is trows like tebow too much air on the passes
-
10-04-19 10:49 PM #46
Some people say I'm so open-minded my brain falls out but I can see both of you being right here. Originally Posted by shocka1212
Shocka is right because turnovers were the difference. Without them UCF would have outscored Cincy.
However, Thomorino is right in that the Freshman QB was exposed by the Cincy defense which caused the turnovers Shocka was referring to by getting a good rush on him.
-
10-04-19 10:51 PM #47
If anything CIncy didn't make any adjustments.. they played the exact same game both 1st and 2nd half and just waited for the UCF to make bad decisions. Originally Posted by QuantumLeap
-
10-04-19 10:52 PM #48
He's completely ignoring cincinnatis defensive adjustments made at halftime. They were the difference in the game. Originally Posted by QuantumLeap
-
10-04-19 10:54 PM #49
You're a fool if you think that. 2nd half adjustments were huge. Far more blitzing, jumping routes, completely different strategy. Cincinnati defensive coordinator will be a head coach soon. Originally Posted by shocka1212
-
10-04-19 10:54 PM #50
Lmao both of y’all arguing about the dumbest shiiiit. You’re both right how ever way you look at it Jesus 🤦🏻*♂️
-
10-04-19 10:55 PM #51
They got a pass rush because they started blitzing, totally different strategy in the second half. Originally Posted by QuantumLeap
-
10-04-19 10:56 PM #52
Originally Posted by thomorino
ok...... so the 3 int's and fumbled hand off that led to points for cincinatti weren't the difference. got it. clearly just trying to engage me here to make a little more traffic here on a Friday night. just another paid SBR poster trying to trigger people.
-
10-04-19 10:57 PM #53
actually they didn't... they were basically giving him all the time he needed daring him to throw the ball downfield.. would bet that you didn't even watch this game. Originally Posted by thomorino
-
10-04-19 10:58 PM #54
The fumble occurred because of a blitz. The strategy in the second half was completely different than the first. You so not understand football - why you'll never post and track. You'd get exposed in 2 seconds. Originally Posted by shocka1212
ok...... so the 3 int's and fumbled hand off that led to points for cincinatti weren't the difference. got it. clearly just trying to engage me here to make a little more traffic here on a Friday night. just another paid SBR poster trying to trigger people.
-
10-04-19 10:59 PM #55
Your comments are getting dinner by the second, watch the fble, it was a blitz. Originally Posted by shocka1212
-
10-04-19 11:00 PM #56
If you think the defensive strategy was the same in both halves by Cincinnati you either don't know football or didn't watch the game, in this case probably both.
-
10-05-19 01:26 PM #57
Just another paid poster trying to trigger people lending nothing but useless insults in response to articulated analaysis.
-
10-05-19 01:40 PM #58
I'm not paid and your analysis is still garbage. Cincinnati cometely changes their strategy in the second half. Originally Posted by shocka1212
Reply With Quote
