Originally Posted by
Grivas_Digeni
Lightning poker was a huge success in my book. I spent next to no time on it because I was out in the first 5 minutes 50% of the time. And if I stuck around I final tabled just about every time. Nice structure - hope it is here to stay.
As far as the qualifying structure Drew suggests, with monthly champions - nice! Give everyone a chance to make it to the final without playing every day.
Another idea to kick around is have a monthly champion, but tweak the system. I'm sure some of you played Ultimate Race contest on another gambling site. You get to make 4 ATS picks every day, and whoever picks 200 winners first wins the first prize. On the day it happens, suppose players in places from 2 to 6 have 198, 197, 195, 195 and 193 wins. Now they continue picking ATS, 4 games a day, until someone else has 200 winners - and he gets the 'silver medal' and 2nd place prize. Etc etc.
With daily bookkeeping by sam at such a high level, we could use a similar system for qualifying (weekly, monthly, etc)
1) A target number is set. It can be a number of poker points/prizes won (makes most sense), number of wins (similar but not the same) or even number of cashes (bobby waves wishes!)
2) Normal daily play begins. Suppose the target is 1000 points. Whoever gets 1000 points (this takes at least 4 cashes, but more likely 6-8 cashes) first, is added to the list of finalists. Whether this player continues to play dailys for the remainder of the month is his personal choice, most would play for points but many would stay away I would think.
- if a target is 10 cashes, you would still get the normal 300points for first, 200 for second in poker points, but for the qualification purposes 1st and 2nd would mean the same*. Once 18 players have at least 10 cashes each, dailys can continue but the field of finalists (assuming it's 18 players like last promo) would be determined.
- a flexible Finals date would also make sense here. But from past events it's pretty easy to extrapolate a number that would be a reasonable target to make the whole event last for a certain desired period of time.
*Number of actual points could be used as a tie-breaker.
What this does is makes qualifying unpredictable/exciting for a big group of players, except a group of golden boys who will just win the first 4 tournaments they play and clinch. But for the rest of us, a nice SHORT run of 2-3 consecutive cashes would mean moving up sufficiently to become a monthly champion (or runner-up), especially if the several guys who are near the finish line continue to come up empty.
With no definite deadline I think you would see a surge in number of people playing. Just because after a single high-place finish, even if it's a fluke, your chance of qualifying that month go way up (less time for the 'golden boys', the cabos and jakepeavys of the world to catch up). I understand that a single 1st place finish also increases your chance of qualifying GREATLY in the old system - especially if we are talking a 1-month long qualifying period - but one of the benefits of any new system is, well, it's new. Players just don't know until they've tried it. And I see more people giving it a shot.
If you think this could be implemented I will write up a detailed draft qualifying system for you Drew, see what you think.