Randle might be the best player on the Lakers roster they need to trade him.
 SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks |
Best Sportsbooks List
|
|
| |||||
| #1 FanDuel | SBR rating 4.8/5 | Review | #6 BetRivers | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review | #2 Caesars | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #7 Fanatics | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review |
| #3 DraftKings | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #8 Betway | SBR rating 3.8/5 | Review | ||
| #4 BetMGM | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #9 Borgata | SBR rating 3.5/5 | Review | ||
| #5 bet365 | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #10 ClutchBet | SBR rating 2.9/5 | Review | ||
-
10-21-17 03:47 PM #106
-
10-22-17 11:44 PM #107
STARTERS MIN FG 3PT FT OREB DREB REB AST STL BLK TO PF +/- PTS L. Nance Jr.PF 15 3-6 0-0 0-0 2 1 3 0 1 0 1 4 -10 6 B. IngramSF 24 3-9 0-1 1-2 0 2 2 4 0 0 1 5 +16 7 B. LopezC 18 2-8 1-3 2-2 1 5 6 0 1 2 2 3 -9 7 L. BallPG 36 3-13 0-5 2-2 1 7 8 13 1 0 5 1 -24 8 K. Caldwell-PopeSG 31 7-11 2-4 4-4 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 -19 20 BENCH MIN FG 3PT FT OREB DREB REB AST STL BLK TO PF +/- PTS J. RandlePF 24 5-6 0-0 1-3 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 4 +2 11 K. KuzmaPF 30 7-13 2-6 4-4 1 5 6 2 1 0 2 3 +2 20 A. BogutC 9 1-1 0-0 0-0 0 3 3 0 0 1 0 1 +1 2 T. EnnisPG 3 0-1 0-0 0-0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 -8 0 J. ClarksonPG 26 10-18 3-6 1-1 0 0 0 5 0 0 2 0 +4 24 J. HartSG 15 2-3 1-2 0-0 2 2 4 1 0 0 0 1 +21 5 C. BrewerSG 9 1-1 0-0 0-2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 -11 2
He sinks even one of those threes and things look that much better.
May have to work on that +/- though.
-
10-22-17 11:47 PM #108
Assists look good for Ball, but damn, he needs to make his shots. Or just stop shooting.
-
10-22-17 11:51 PM #109
That's what I'm saying. He sinks just a couple more shots, maybe 1 or 2 of those threes, then it's pretty good production and a double double.
Originally Posted by VeggieDog
Maybe he can get to the line a few more times a game as well.
-
10-23-17 12:04 AM #110
How about playing some defense? Had turnovers at critical junctures too.
-
10-23-17 12:05 AM #111
Yeah, I didn't watch the game and the stats only tell part of the story. I was thinking that when I mentioned getting to the line. He's obviously not driving to the hole a lot. Originally Posted by IBetYou
-
10-23-17 09:23 AM #112
The question I have with Ball, is will he be as good or better than Russell? Magic said he got rid of Russell because he wanted a leader. I think Russell is becoming a leader in Brooklyn. He's also a great passer, a good defender, and a good shooter. I'll go out on a limb and say Russell will have the better career.
-
10-23-17 09:31 AM #113
03-Nov 22:30 Bro @ LAL 02-Feb 19:30 Bro _ LAL
-
10-23-17 09:34 AM #114
Interesting, only the 2nd player in NBA history to put up 25, 10, and 5 in his first road game, the only other to do it was Oscar Robinson on the same exact day 57 years ago.
-
10-23-17 10:06 AM #115
Hmmm context is everything though. Bledsoe should have destroyed him, but he gave a cool effort. Two days later Bledsoe admits on twitter he wants out. Basically playing poorly so he gets traded. Suns defense disgraceful through 3 games.
-
10-23-17 10:12 AM #116
Suns defense has always been bad, nothing new there. I doubt Bledsoe would purposefully play bad defense on a 2nd game rookie, nobody wants that kind of attention. But if what you say is correct perhaps we shouldnt see anymore near triple doubles or triple doubles for that matter from Mr. Ball all season long.
-
10-23-17 10:16 AM #117
He'll get triple double (whoopdyfriggindo) but he wont be scoring 30pts again.
-
10-23-17 10:19 AM #118
Funny how people make such a big deal out of triple doubles. He rebounds well for a guard yes. Just say he's a good rebounder for a guard and leave it at that. Any starting pg in the NBA can get the pts/ assist double-double.
-
10-23-17 10:22 AM #119
If they could they simply would. So you dont think Ball will have another 30 pt game this season? Cmon. Doesnt really matter, he's a team player, wants to distribute, how can you hate a young guy for that? The young guys we normally see are me first type players, its refreshing to see someone who'd rather get others involved. There are many players not in the league who have the talent to be in the league but they played the wrong way, by being selfish, Ball not that guy. Originally Posted by IBetYou
Funny how people make such a big deal out of triple doubles. He rebounds well for a guard yes. Just say he's a good rebounder for a guard and leave it at that. Any starting pg in the NBA can get the pts/ assist double-double.
-
10-23-17 10:31 AM #120
I don't hate him. He's a good rebounding pg with court vision. Russell is better.
-
11-04-17 01:45 PM #121
After 9 games Lonzo is shooting 30% from the field
-
11-04-17 01:47 PM #122
If it was 1957 his father would be working in a gas station.
-
11-04-17 02:11 PM #123
He can defend a lot better than Russell. I guess it just comes down to team need. If your team needs a PG who can lead by scoring - Russell is your guy. If you need someone to defend, push the ball and rebound - Lonzo is it. Originally Posted by IBetYou
I think it's easier to coach a decent shot than it is to teach defense, awareness (which is what rebounding is) and court vision.
-
11-04-17 03:01 PM #124
The advantage Ball has is he's proven already to be a good leader. Russell meanwhile is a babe in the woods.
Both have good court vision. Both lack quickness. You can't discount the value of shooting -that's what the NBA is about nowadays. By the time Ball learns to hit threes at a respectable rate Russell will be knocking them down with precision.
-
11-04-17 03:24 PM #125
Take out the PHX game and he is shooting well below 30%. Originally Posted by eidolon
After 9 games Lonzo is shooting 30% from the field
-
11-04-17 03:50 PM #126
Well the good news is that he's not Markelle Fultze.
-
11-04-17 09:02 PM #127
Some experts thing Ball not athletic enough to be real big time
Good but will not be great like say Simmons
-
11-09-17 09:56 PM #128
After going 3-of-12 in the loss to the Wizards, Lonzo Ball has the 2nd-worst FG pct through 12 games in the shot-clock era (via @EliasSports)
-
11-09-17 09:59 PM #129
bust city
-
11-09-17 09:59 PM #130
How did the career of those other three guys pan out?
-
11-09-17 10:03 PM #131
These were all scrubs Originally Posted by The Giant
How did the career of those other three guys pan out?
-
11-09-17 10:07 PM #132
He really belongs in the developmental league he’s not an NBA player
-
11-09-17 10:07 PM #133
The thing about Lonzo is, it almost feels like he doesn't enjoy basketball.
He rarely smiles, and when he does it seems forced.
Hopefully he's not just playing to make his daddy happy.
-
11-09-17 10:09 PM #134
like this is a surprise ?
who actually thought Lonzo would be a high percentage shooter
All of his passes are vanilla
Very unimpressive player
sure he will get assists , he likes to do basica dribble moves to either side of the court and pass it to a guy
for a quick shot , but there is nothing, I mean nothing impressive about his play
I guess he can pulll down some boards
-
11-09-17 11:13 PM #135
-
11-09-17 11:33 PM #136
4 pages of chatter on a rookie pg... what did people on here expect out of him? Playoffs? Average a triple double?
Basketball people aren't surprised by his performance so far, only dilettantes that watch sports programs and read TMZ.
-
11-09-17 11:51 PM #137
The idiots wont stop talking.
-
11-09-17 11:53 PM #138
Im not saying he wont put up some numbers on the stat sheet, he will
hell he kinda has. Its just hes no better than the average point guard
Now if his shot was wet , then it would all change because he has a knack for picking up boards
-
11-10-17 12:05 AM #139
kid needs to learn how to shoot or he's out of here. fukks sake even rubio can shoot 3s now
-
11-10-17 12:08 AM #140
He can shoot just takes longer for some to adjust to new 3 pt line, he was money in college. Bird averaged about 25% from 3 for 4 years straight before he really got going, it wont take Ball that long, but still his main calling card is making plays. Lets say he plays 10+ years then its silly to judge after 11 games. I see talent as Ive always seen in him, once he gets adjusted more the boxscore will look differently, just turned 20.
Reply With Quote
