Let's say over the course of one sports season, you're using a betting system/stragegy, you placed a total of 200 bets. You're using a labby system, so your wagers are variable based on the labby. Let's say if you added up all the wagers in that season, the total wagered was $8000. This means that the average wager was $8000 / 200 bets = $40 per wager. Your average is $40 per wager, so some bets are low (let's say $10) and some bets are much higer due to a really bad losing streak; let's say your worst streak means your highest bet over the course of the season is $300.

Now, if you were to go back into that same season and start over again and simply wager $40 per bet instead of running a labby line, and bet on the same 200 bets, shouldn't the end result (your net profit / loss after the 200 bets) be almost the same as when you used the labby? There would be some differences depending on good or bad streaks, but if you average it out over an entire season, shouldn't the end result be very similar, considering that the average amount wagered per bet ($40) is the same?

I've posted this on another thread but it's an old thread and no one responded...I'm really curious to what you guys think!