1. #36
    Sunde91
    Sunde91's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-26-09
    Posts: 8,325
    Betpoints: 255

    (pseudo) sharps buried


  2. #37
    No coincidences
    Baseball at The Corner
    No coincidences's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-18-10
    Posts: 76,300
    Betpoints: 16541

    The "sharp" play was no play.

  3. #38
    brahmabull117
    brahmabull117's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-08-10
    Posts: 8,622
    Betpoints: 42

    Quote Originally Posted by No coincidences View Post
    The "sharp" play was no play.

    Dude alabama was never even in a position to have a chance to cover this during the entire game



    WTF are you talking about??? How was LSU not the play here??

  4. #39
    d2bets
    d2bets's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 08-10-05
    Posts: 39,777
    Betpoints: 21677

    Quote Originally Posted by No coincidences View Post
    The "sharp" play was no play.
    Nope. LSU +6 or ML +200 was extremely sharp.

  5. #40
    P.F.Kasooff
    P.F.Kasooff's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-13-10
    Posts: 1,903
    Betpoints: 13

    What can I say ...?

  6. #41
    face
    face's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-31-11
    Posts: 14,740
    Betpoints: 201

    Quote Originally Posted by P.F.Kasooff View Post
    What can I say ...?

    lsu should have been favored, then people would have bet them

  7. #42
    mintpicks79
    mintpicks79's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-04-08
    Posts: 1,151
    Betpoints: 326

    I'm pretty sure 65-70% of the bets where on LSU.

  8. #43
    k13
    k13's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-16-10
    Posts: 17,537
    Betpoints: 1836

    It's easy to say what's sharp after the game is over.

  9. #44
    P.F.Kasooff
    P.F.Kasooff's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-13-10
    Posts: 1,903
    Betpoints: 13

    Quote Originally Posted by k13 View Post

    It's easy to say what's sharp after the game is over.

    Dude , check the time stamp on Post #1

    LSU + pts is a no brainer even if they lost

  10. #45
    No coincidences
    Baseball at The Corner
    No coincidences's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-18-10
    Posts: 76,300
    Betpoints: 16541

    Quote Originally Posted by brahmabull117 View Post
    Dude alabama was never even in a position to have a chance to cover this during the entire game



    WTF are you talking about??? How was LSU not the play here??
    Alabama dominated up front. They missed four field goals and had a 50/50 interception at the goal line.

    When was LSU in a position to score at all other than the two times they did in regulation?

  11. #46
    No coincidences
    Baseball at The Corner
    No coincidences's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-18-10
    Posts: 76,300
    Betpoints: 16541

    Quote Originally Posted by d2bets View Post
    Nope. LSU +6 or ML +200 was extremely sharp.


    Of course you can say that now.

  12. #47
    brahmabull117
    brahmabull117's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-08-10
    Posts: 8,622
    Betpoints: 42

    Quote Originally Posted by No coincidences View Post
    Alabama dominated up front. They missed four field goals and had a 50/50 interception at the goal line. When was LSU in a position to score at all other than the two times they did in regulation?

    you make it sound like those field goals were chip shots...they were all 50 yarders (or close to 50 yarders) and those are very low percentage kicks in college. The goal line INT was a fantastic play by the best defensive secondary in the country. The point was that this game was a coin flip - absolutely no reason to believe that Bama had any real chance to win this game by 6+


    it's especially stupid to lay that many points in a defensive minded game because touchdowns are so hard to come by

  13. #48
    suicidekings
    Update your status
    suicidekings's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-23-09
    Posts: 9,962

    Quote Originally Posted by No coincidences View Post
    The "sharp" play was no play.
    Indeed. I'll eat my loss on the over and be happy I never actually took a side.

  14. #49
    No coincidences
    Baseball at The Corner
    No coincidences's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-18-10
    Posts: 76,300
    Betpoints: 16541

    Quote Originally Posted by brahmabull117 View Post
    you make it sound like those field goals were chip shots...they were all 50 yarders (or close to 50 yarders) and those are very low percentage kicks in college. The goal line INT was a fantastic play by the best defensive secondary in the country. The point was that this game was a coin flip - absolutely no reason to believe that Bama had any real chance to win this game by 6+


    it's especially stupid to lay that many points in a defensive minded game because touchdowns are so hard to come by
    So why didn't you play LSU and the under?

  15. #50
    brahmabull117
    brahmabull117's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-08-10
    Posts: 8,622
    Betpoints: 42

    Quote Originally Posted by No coincidences View Post
    So why didn't you play LSU and the under?
    I played LSU but not the under


    I thought it would be a 20-17 type game, I'm actually surprised by how little offense there was in this game

  16. #51
    suicidekings
    Update your status
    suicidekings's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-23-09
    Posts: 9,962

    Quote Originally Posted by brahmabull117 View Post
    you make it sound like those field goals were chip shots...they were all 50 yarders (or close to 50 yarders) and those are very low percentage kicks in college. The goal line INT was a fantastic play by the best defensive secondary in the country. The point was that this game was a coin flip - absolutely no reason to believe that Bama had any real chance to win this game by 6+

    it's especially stupid to lay that many points in a defensive minded game because touchdowns are so hard to come by
    IMO, that was the play of the college season to this point. Amazing.

  17. #52
    k13
    k13's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-16-10
    Posts: 17,537
    Betpoints: 1836

    Quote Originally Posted by P.F.Kasooff View Post
    Dude , check the time stamp on Post #1

    LSU + pts is a no brainer even if they lost
    if you expect 4 fg's missed....

    How often does that happen?

  18. #53
    brahmabull117
    brahmabull117's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-08-10
    Posts: 8,622
    Betpoints: 42

    Quote Originally Posted by k13 View Post
    if you expect 4 fg's missed.... How often does that happen?

    they were 50 yard kicks for god's sake



    it's college football, those are extremely low percentage

  19. #54
    No coincidences
    Baseball at The Corner
    No coincidences's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-18-10
    Posts: 76,300
    Betpoints: 16541

    Quote Originally Posted by brahmabull117 View Post
    they were 50 yard kicks for god's sake



    it's college football, those are extremely low percentage
    They were all 50 yarders? Really? Hmmm, don't remember them being that long.

  20. #55
    brahmabull117
    brahmabull117's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-08-10
    Posts: 8,622
    Betpoints: 42

    Quote Originally Posted by no coincidences View Post
    they were all 50 yarders? Really? Hmmm, don't remember them being that long.
    49, 44, 50, 52




    very low percentage kicks in CFB

  21. #56
    P.F.Kasooff
    P.F.Kasooff's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-13-10
    Posts: 1,903
    Betpoints: 13

    Some of you guys dont get it (thats why Bookies clean up in the long run)

    What happened in the game is inconsequential to what the smart/sharp bet was before K.O.

  22. #57
    Sunde91
    Sunde91's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-26-09
    Posts: 8,325
    Betpoints: 255

    "sharp" meaning line movementz/anti-public = bama -points was the play


    "sharp" meaning the keen/smart play = lsu +points was the play

  23. #58
    No coincidences
    Baseball at The Corner
    No coincidences's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-18-10
    Posts: 76,300
    Betpoints: 16541

    Quote Originally Posted by Sunde91 View Post
    "sharp" meaning line movementz/anti-public = bama -points was the play


    "sharp" meaning the keen/smart play = lsu +points was the play
    So what was driving the money away from LSU? Big money but not sharp money?

    This argument is foolish, given we already know the outcome and it's obvious in retrospect to say LSU was the "sharp" side.

  24. #59
    P.F.Kasooff
    P.F.Kasooff's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-13-10
    Posts: 1,903
    Betpoints: 13

    Many people have gone broke trying to interpret 'Line Movement'

  25. #60
    brahmabull117
    brahmabull117's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-08-10
    Posts: 8,622
    Betpoints: 42

    Quote Originally Posted by No coincidences View Post
    So what was driving the money away from LSU? Big money but not sharp money? This argument is foolish, given we already know the outcome and it's obvious in retrospect to say LSU was the "sharp" side.

    when are you gonna understand that vegas doesn't control the outcome on the field???



    this game was a coin flip, just like every sports expert/announcer/analyst everywhere told you. Neither team had any significant advantage and there was no reason to believe Bama (or either team really) would win by a large margin



    Sometimes, when it quacks like a duck, and it walks like a duck...well it's a duck

  26. #61
    convick
    convick's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 11-03-11
    Posts: 3,805
    Betpoints: 3683

    Quote Originally Posted by brahmabull117 View Post
    49, 44, 50, 52




    very low percentage kicks in CFB
    Correct... and one of those was blocked! Probably doesnt go through the uprights anyways.

    These kicks weren't PATs for gods sake!

  27. #62
    k13
    k13's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-16-10
    Posts: 17,537
    Betpoints: 1836

    Quote Originally Posted by brahmabull117 View Post
    they were 50 yard kicks for god's sake



    it's college football, those are extremely low percentage
    One was 44, other 49 and the other 50.

    FG's over 50 yards are 41% this year.

  28. #63
    No coincidences
    Baseball at The Corner
    No coincidences's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-18-10
    Posts: 76,300
    Betpoints: 16541

    Quote Originally Posted by brahmabull117 View Post
    when are you gonna understand that vegas doesn't control the outcome on the field???



    this game was a coin flip, just like every sports expert/announcer/analyst everywhere told you. Neither team had any significant advantage and there was no reason to believe Bama (or either team really) would win by a large margin



    Sometimes, when it quacks like a duck, and it walks like a duck...well it's a duck
    Where did I say anything about Vegas controlling the outcome on the field? Something -- or someone -- was driving the Bama line up, and it wasn't the public.

    I'll let you trust the ESPN guys and other "sports experts" -- I'm not interested in listening to them before I make a play chief. I know how big you are on reading crap like that beforehand and making a bet.

  29. #64
    brahmabull117
    brahmabull117's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-08-10
    Posts: 8,622
    Betpoints: 42

    Quote Originally Posted by k13 View Post
    One was 44, other 49 and the other 50. FG's over 50 yards are 41% this year.

    great so let's say Bama kicks that 49 yard fg before overtime - that means they're 3-5 for FGs for the game (60% - a very reasonable percentage considering the length of the kicks)



    LSU still covers...they just lose 9-6 in regulation

  30. #65
    brahmabull117
    brahmabull117's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-08-10
    Posts: 8,622
    Betpoints: 42

    Quote Originally Posted by No coincidences View Post
    Something -- or someone -- was driving the Bama line up, and it wasn't the public.


    great, do they play the game?? do they coach the players??



    no?? then what they do is absolutely irrelevant

  31. #66
    Sunde91
    Sunde91's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-26-09
    Posts: 8,325
    Betpoints: 255

    Quote Originally Posted by No coincidences View Post
    So what was driving the money away from LSU? Big money but not sharp money? This argument is foolish, given we already know the outcome and it's obvious in retrospect to say LSU was the "sharp" side.

    I just said Bama was the "sharp" side meaning line movementz, "sharp" money

    Talking value, talking the smart play, it's pretty reasonable to say it was LSU regardless of what hapened

    That won't be proven, but safe to assume pseudo sharps would have been all over LSU + if everyone were on Bama and there was "RLM"

  32. #67
    k13
    k13's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-16-10
    Posts: 17,537
    Betpoints: 1836

    I like how everything is being based on a sample size of ONE.

  33. #68
    k13
    k13's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-16-10
    Posts: 17,537
    Betpoints: 1836

    Sharps don't win every game. I think we can all agree with this.

  34. #69
    brahmabull117
    brahmabull117's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-08-10
    Posts: 8,622
    Betpoints: 42

    Quote Originally Posted by k13 View Post
    I like how everything is being based on a sample size of ONE.

    that reverse line movement crap has been complete nonsense in college CFB this year



    evaluate matchups and determine value, forget everything else. If a line is overpriced or underpriced, then bet on it... Many people have gone broke trying to interpret "line movements"

  35. #70
    k13
    k13's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-16-10
    Posts: 17,537
    Betpoints: 1836

    Quote Originally Posted by brahmabull117 View Post
    that reverse line movement crap has been complete nonsense in college CFB this year



    evaluate matchups and determine value, fck everything else
    I'll show you something interesting tomorrow.

First 123 Last
Top