1. #1
    will2survive
    STAY IN YO LANE!
    will2survive's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-26-09
    Posts: 8,106
    Betpoints: 22

    Chris Webber for HOF?

    Was looking at wikipedia and saw his name on the draft list (for that year). His numbers are good enough but he wasn't established on one team for a long period of time. (good on the Kings but could've been better)

    He was a trend setter with the Fab 5 at Michigan. A hard working talented player that caused commotion at times.


    If Chris Mullin get's in, Chris Webber should.

    Hall of fame should represent the "elite". Too many players get in the HOF in every sport.

    Great player. Boarderline HOF career but NO

  2. #2
    k13
    k13's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-16-10
    Posts: 17,537
    Betpoints: 1836

    Not even close to HOF.

  3. #3
    thezbar
    .lent
    thezbar's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 08-29-06
    Posts: 6,398
    Betpoints: 1640

    No Way. C. Web bombed in Sacramento towards the end. Good Player but not hof material.

  4. #4
    will2survive
    STAY IN YO LANE!
    will2survive's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-26-09
    Posts: 8,106
    Betpoints: 22

    What's so much better about Chris Mullin than Chris Webber? Nothing

    I know that they play different positions but Chris Mullin couldn't handle Webber in his prime. Webber could shoot. I remember him nailing 3's consistently against Duke in college

  5. #5
    jjgold
    jjgold's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-20-05
    Posts: 388,190
    Betpoints: 10

    not even close

  6. #6
    k13
    k13's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-16-10
    Posts: 17,537
    Betpoints: 1836

    Quote Originally Posted by will2survive View Post
    What's so much better about Chris Mullin than Chris Webber? Nothing

    I know that they play different positions but Chris Mullin couldn't handle Webber in his prime. Webber could shoot. I remember him nailing 3's consistently against Duke in college
    I don't think Mullin should have got in either.

    He mostly got in because he's white. Different type of player.

    Webber's put-back/rebound/dunk type of players are dime a dozen.

    Both losers.

  7. #7
    William Walters
    William Walters's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 6,372
    Betpoints: 233

    You need a TIMEOUT for this thread

  8. #8
    Doc JS
    Doc JS's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-15-06
    Posts: 6,885
    Betpoints: 12

    Absolutely...provided he buys a ticket!

  9. #9
    will2survive
    STAY IN YO LANE!
    will2survive's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-26-09
    Posts: 8,106
    Betpoints: 22

    No timeout1 I said neither belongs but Chris Webber was underrated. He could play inside and had an outside game. I know basketball. My point is, (and I loved his game at St. John's)(they used to be my 2nd favorite team to Duke), Chris Mullin was a great college player and better when he got off of alcohol in the pros. To say that he's better than Chris Webber is criminal. Different styles but the quality of Mullin isn't higher than the quality of Webber.

    On a sidenote, Webber is much better at his current career than Mullin is also. If you ask, "who's the more likeable player?", I say Chris Mullin (not because he's white). I also thought that Reggie Miller was better than Mullin also. Mullin get's into the hall of fame and Reggie Miller doesn't? Reggie Miller was the ultimate clutch player.

    Reggie Miller "The 8 points in 8 seconds man" (against the Knicks), yet Mullin makes the speech and Reggie doesn't get the recognition. What a joke

  10. #10
    Nookx
    Nookx's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-17-07
    Posts: 486
    Betpoints: 24

    Dude the HoF in all sports is bullshit.

Top