1. #1
    mafioso
    mafioso's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-14-11
    Posts: 76
    Betpoints: 115

    I know it says no systems in the Think Tank but this one can not be frowned upon

    You can go back to 1980 to check this baby out, Its a winner including 2-0 last year to make it a 17-0 system since 1980.

    Last years games were bet against the Chargers at Cincy
    and Bet against the Packers at Atlanta (Reg Season)

    here it is in a nutshell

    Bet against any team playing on the road playing a non divisional game
    If that same team scored 30 or more the last 2 weeks and allowed 12 or less points in the same two weeks.

    thats it plain and simple.

  2. #2
    GunShard
    Invest In Ethereum And Bitcoin
    GunShard's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-05-10
    Posts: 9,984
    Betpoints: 1926

    I'll keep my eye on this.

  3. #3
    LT Profits
    LT Profits's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-27-06
    Posts: 90,963
    Betpoints: 5179

    It can be frowned upon because you are not considering the line of the upcoming game.

  4. #4
    That Foreign Guy
    I got sunshine in a bag
    That Foreign Guy's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-18-10
    Posts: 432
    Betpoints: 3069

    It can be frowned upon because it's blatant data mining.

  5. #5
    Pancho sanza
    Pancho sanza's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-18-07
    Posts: 386

    Quote Originally Posted by That Foreign Guy View Post
    It can be frowned upon because it's blatant data mining.
    What he said.

  6. #6
    suicidekings
    Update your status
    suicidekings's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-23-09
    Posts: 9,962

    Quote Originally Posted by mafioso View Post
    I know it says no systems but this one can not be frowned upon.


    This is exactly what's meant by no systems in the thinktank... A system claiming a 100% win rate that depends on 4 criteria and produced 17 qualifying games in 30 years? Even the guys that are successful using a systems approach would laugh you out of the room with this nonsense.

  7. #7
    Bill Dozer
    @BillDozer110
    Bill Dozer's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-12-05
    Posts: 10,894
    Betpoints: 21705

    It would be one thing if the math of a system or a correlation could be argued for our against.... like factoring in if the line is x when the previous thingy was y. I even like to read the argument on why the Martingale would work. It's good readin for newbie think tankers.

  8. #8
    Extra Innings
    Extra Innings's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-26-10
    Posts: 15,058
    Betpoints: 315

    Quote Originally Posted by LT Profits View Post
    It can be frowned upon because you are not considering the line of the upcoming game.

  9. #9
    mafioso
    mafioso's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-14-11
    Posts: 76
    Betpoints: 115

    I guess I stand corrected, I always felt that anything that stands the test of time and hasnt lost is a thing of value and beauty.
    Last edited by mafioso; 07-16-11 at 10:42 PM.

  10. #10
    wiffle
    wiffle's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-07-10
    Posts: 610
    Betpoints: 13

    ban

  11. #11
    topgame85
    topgame85's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-30-08
    Posts: 12,325
    Betpoints: 3082

    17 game sample size will never be considered a large enough sample size to take seriously, plenty here have experienced BJ or roulette where they lost 20 hands straight or black hit 17 times in a row etc. May be something to look at and bet yet math guys won't give it any credibility.

  12. #12
    emoney
    emoney's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-12-09
    Posts: 1,481
    Betpoints: 25

    I don't know how books stay in business with guys like this running around.

Top