[HedgeHog]

Originally posted on 05/23/2021:

Summary of the position:

- See prior posts: We all know it is mathematically impossible for 8+ players to rack up 200k+ on a 96% RTP slot - all agree about this

- We have been trying to get to the bottom of what the exploit was

- It looked like the answer to the exploit was in the jp5418 post about the 10 spin cycle (adjusting bet size on the 10th spin)

- Spencer (far more trustworthy, rational and balanced than the OP) has stated that this is not the case

- We know there was an exploit **somewhere** because of this quote from Optional (the most trusted source here at SBR):

"
The problem is that there is no need to accept a loss, as the game setting allowed players to keep resetting to start the feature again multiple times.

It no longer works that way.
"

- rickron (another 200k+ winner on the "Take The xxxx" slots) also admits he used the exploit:

"This feature that allows players to adjust their bet amount was integrated into the gameplay from the very beginning of its release date in 2019"


- So there was an exploit but at this stage we do not know the precise details (it sounds like Optional does)

- The only slot MYB and Betsoft are interested in is the "Take The xxxxx" slots. No other slots have been questioned by these companies.

- The OP tried to smoke screen / obfuscate this on multiple occasions by mentioning other slots - but we all know from this thread that the only way you can accrue 300k+ from a 96% RTP slot is via an exploit - and the only slots that had an exploit were the "Take The xxxx" slots

- MYB decided to withhold payment to those individuals who used the exploit on the "Take The xxxx" slots

As far as I am aware this is the current position.

Maybe soon we will have a clearer picture of the exact nature of the exploit based on the Optional quote.

Here's a summary of my position: Nothing is "mathematically impossible". Instead events can be increasingly more mathematically improbable as is obviously the case here. Regardless, it is the Book's responsibility to prove this "exploit" as you call it, if they decide to withhold payment from the players. Did My Bookie do this? Not to my satisfaction, and certainly not to that of the players affected. But you and others have been quick to support this shiit Book from the start. How about the countless times that Books use rigged casinos to drain players' balances? When some poor degenerate loses 15-20 straight hands of Blackjack, where are you and the math police to defend the improbability of this? This seems to happen all too often, with Books using an"exploit" to curb a hot casino player and basically steal their winnings and then some. Basically it's the wild wild west for casino players. There's little to no regulation, so Books can do to you whatever they want. Why someone would willingly participate in this -Ev situation is beyond me.

To summarize: Casino players should not expect to win, and when they do, Books need not pay. And that seems to be ok with you.