Originally <a href='http://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/showthread.php?p=24536525'>posted</a> on 09/21/2015:

Quote Originally Posted by 2daBank View Post
I really don't understand how no pick doesn't mean that? Especially when we talking bout a week I said it was taking my pick longer cause the choices of bigger favs was terrible and couldn't be trusted.
It doesn't mean that because it was set, before anyone joined, that no picks would be the worst ML dog. No one seemed to have an issue with that, it was only brought up when 15 people forgot to pick and ended up winning. I refuse to do elimination without a pick, as if someone forgets or just can't make a pick for a week because something came up then I don't believe it's fair to take their entry and just boot them out. The best solution is giving them an auto pick. I give them the team, betting wise, least likely to win. It's completely fair, if you had an issue with it before then you should have not joined/spoken up. However, it seems like the issue is only because they won, and you feel like they should be eliminated so there would only be a handful of people left.

I guarantee that 98-99.9% of the field would have had NO ISSUE with an auto pick of Tampa Bay before the game started. I also guarantee you 100% of the field would have had no issue if the Bucs lost.

Complaining after the fact because you want an easier road is stupid.

If people don't make picks for Week 3 they'll get the Jaguars, who play the Patriots in Foxboro. Doubt anyone will have an issue with that right now, but if the Jags somehow win then there will be a problem.