Originally <a href='/showthread.php?p=16980644'>posted</a> on 12/02/2012:

It is beginning to look like their position is that they don't think anybody reads these reviews. A bunch of inaccurate information in the reviews must not hurt the bottom line. Everybody here knows all the British bookies limit, limit, and then limit some more immediately. I have been posting here for over two years now, and was a lurker for a couple years before that. SBR is invaluable to me. Yet, I too lose a lot of respect when obvious errors like this are pointed out and still the mods come in here to deflect from the question. Justin7 and BillDozer both come in here and acknowledge that these sites limit for risk management as they point out that the A-rating is for financial security --- while ignoring the fact that the reviews are flat-out false. It sounds like it is easier to talk around an issue rather than face it and fix it!