Originally posted on 08/19/2012:

I'm wondering what may be obvious to some, and looking way past this situation.

Basically EVERY processor that has been, or is being used to pay players is a potential target of the feds, ergo the players' money, and in some cases long after its been recieved and spent.

The threshold seems pretty easy to meet, any processor who failed to state they were clearing monies derived from gaming are subject to at least a laundering charge, right?
That's pretty much every processor, and there's no way any statute of limitations have run out yet, except if you stopped betting at least 5 years ago.

Is there anyone who can post a truley educated statement about this?
I'm thinking an attorney with federal experience, and ideally gaming/financial experience as well.
Civil or criminal really doesn't matter on the fed level, as I believe civil can be made criminal with the flip of a switch.

Can SBR reach out to I. Nelson Rose for an interview about this specifically?

In light if them pulling the thread down, this would be the next most sensible move.
Unless what he would say would be very painful to hear.

Please Bill, John etal.

A comment please.