Quote Originally Posted by rocky502 View Post
Condit out threw him in 4 0f 5 rds, outlanded him in 4 of 5 rds, and had way more exciting striking technique with head kicks, flying knees, and spinning back fists. Diaz was himself and could not even land many of his pitty pat punches. I repeat from my previous post. DO NOT CONFUSE MOVING FORWARD WITH "CONTROLLING THE OCTAGON" OR "RING GENERALSHIP". He had better striking technique. He executed a game plan and won the fight.

To the meathead MMA fans that don't know shit, this fight is what a real MMA fight is supposed to look like in your eyes:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GdVZV1h3Gd8
All the guys in MMA and MMA trainers that posted saying it was a bad decision know nothing I guess.

You're saying Condit won because he had "exciting striking technique". Good for him. What do you consider exciting? Getting on a bicycle and pedaling around the octagon while landing insignificant strikes? Diaz was never in trouble the entire fight, while Condit on the other hand, was hit so badly he had to back peddle the whole fight to recover. Strikes mean very little in MMA. They are only a small part of it.

It's hard for Diaz to land anything when Condit is running. Condit was not moving in and out he was running. Diaz had full control of the pace of the fight and the exchanges. If Diaz wanted to take it easy he could have stayed in one spot and Condit would not have engaged. This is the maximum amount of control anyone can have in a fight.

Maybe we should all go look at fightmetric stats like you though because that always tells the whole story of a fight. Fightmetric is so good that in the future maybe they'll just use that instead of judges.